Remove unused functions about finding the best ancestors in the call tree, whose usage was removed in #2435

[julienw]

I found that this function is currently unused, and some of other functions were used only by that one. But they might be useful in the future possibly, see for example this comment from Greg. Happy to hear your thoughts about removing this.

I believe that our minifying plugin removes them in the bundle too.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 88.35% // Head: 88.55% // Increases project coverage by +0.19% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (9534bd8) compared to base (f3cfe76).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

❗ Current head 9534bd8 differs from pull request most recent head 9160978. Consider uploading reports for the commit 9160978 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4374      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.35%   88.55%   +0.19%     
==========================================
  Files         282      282              
  Lines       25383    25311      -72     
  Branches     6830     6819      -11     
==========================================
- Hits        22428    22414      -14     
+ Misses       2742     2695      -47     
+ Partials      213      202      -11     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/actions/profile-view.js	90.00% <ø> (+2.63%)	⬆️
src/profile-logic/profile-data.js	93.42% <ø> (+3.01%)	⬆️
src/profile-logic/marker-data.js	93.64% <0.00%> (-0.13%)	⬇️
src/selectors/publish.js	96.87% <0.00%> (ø)
src/components/tooltip/Marker.js	98.44% <0.00%> (ø)
src/profile-logic/marker-schema.js	89.18% <0.00%> (ø)
src/components/marker-table/index.js	88.40% <0.00%> (ø)
src/components/tooltip/TrackPower.js	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/profile-logic/sanitize.js	96.55% <0.00%> (+0.06%)	⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[canova]

Hm, I think I'm fine removing it since it will be in our git history. But it will be harder to find of couse since we need to remember that it's in our git history when we need it.

[julienw]

Thanks! I changed the title of the PR so that hopefully it should be easier to find if we need it in the future.