Fix broadcom vendor driver by marckleinebudde · Pull Request #2 · starfive-tech/linux

marckleinebudde · 2021-04-26T18:36:59Z

This pull-request fixes out-of-tree compilation and silences a noisy warning in the broadcom vendor driver.

For what it's worth, this patch makes the vendor driver compile out of tree. Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>

This patch silences the following warning in the broadcom vendor driver: | In file included from drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/bcmdhd/dhd_config.c:16: | drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/bcmdhd/wl_cfg80211.h:410: warning: "WLAN_AKM_SUITE_FT_8021X_SHA384" redefined | 410 | #define WLAN_AKM_SUITE_FT_8021X_SHA384 0x000FAC0D Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>

pdp7 · 2021-04-26T19:11:23Z

@marckleinebudde thanks for helping!

@MichaelZhuxx @tekkamanninja please take a look at this PR

marckleinebudde

It seems a similar fix was added to https://github.com/starfive-tech/sft-riscv-linux-5.10/ in
starfive-tech/sft-riscv-linux-5.10@9ef64ad#diff-2d90885b6b40ea1cbd102d7102d8cb22c8f5748bcc4526409d3994c234150045

…rallel [ Upstream commit b168e1d ] We got a warning message below. When server tries to close one session by force, it locks the sysfs interface and locks the srv_sess lock. The problem is that client can send a request to close at the same time. By close request, server locks the srv_sess lock and locks the sysfs to remove the sysfs interfaces. The simplest way to prevent that situation could be just use mutex_trylock. [ 234.153965] ====================================================== [ 234.154093] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 234.154219] 5.4.84-storage #5.4.84-1+feature+linux+5.4.y+dbg+20201216.1319+b6b887b~deb10 Tainted: G O [ 234.154381] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 234.154531] kworker/1:1H/618 is trying to acquire lock: [ 234.154651] ffff8887a09db0a8 (kn->count#132){++++}, at: kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x40/0x80 [ 234.154819] but task is already holding lock: [ 234.154965] ffff8887ae5f6518 (&srv_sess->lock){+.+.}, at: rnbd_srv_rdma_ev+0x144/0x1590 [rnbd_server] [ 234.155132] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 234.155311] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 234.155462] -> #1 (&srv_sess->lock){+.+.}: [ 234.155614] __mutex_lock+0x134/0xcb0 [ 234.155761] rnbd_srv_sess_dev_force_close+0x36/0x50 [rnbd_server] [ 234.155889] rnbd_srv_dev_session_force_close_store+0x69/0xc0 [rnbd_server] [ 234.156042] kernfs_fop_write+0x13f/0x240 [ 234.156162] vfs_write+0xf3/0x280 [ 234.156278] ksys_write+0xba/0x150 [ 234.156395] do_syscall_64+0x62/0x270 [ 234.156513] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 234.156632] -> #0 (kn->count#132){++++}: [ 234.156782] __lock_acquire+0x129e/0x23a0 [ 234.156900] lock_acquire+0xf3/0x210 [ 234.157043] __kernfs_remove+0x42b/0x4c0 [ 234.157161] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x40/0x80 [ 234.157282] remove_files+0x3f/0xa0 [ 234.157399] sysfs_remove_group+0x4a/0xb0 [ 234.157519] rnbd_srv_destroy_dev_session_sysfs+0x19/0x30 [rnbd_server] [ 234.157648] rnbd_srv_rdma_ev+0x14c/0x1590 [rnbd_server] [ 234.157775] process_io_req+0x29a/0x6a0 [rtrs_server] [ 234.157924] __ib_process_cq+0x8c/0x100 [ib_core] [ 234.158709] ib_cq_poll_work+0x31/0xb0 [ib_core] [ 234.158834] process_one_work+0x4e5/0xaa0 [ 234.158958] worker_thread+0x65/0x5c0 [ 234.159078] kthread+0x1e0/0x200 [ 234.159194] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 [ 234.159309] other info that might help us debug this: [ 234.159513] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 234.159658] CPU0 CPU1 [ 234.159775] ---- ---- [ 234.159891] lock(&srv_sess->lock); [ 234.160005] lock(kn->count#132); [ 234.160128] lock(&srv_sess->lock); [ 234.160250] lock(kn->count#132); [ 234.160364] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 234.160536] 3 locks held by kworker/1:1H/618: [ 234.160677] #0: ffff8883ca1ed528 ((wq_completion)ib-comp-wq){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x40a/0xaa0 [ 234.160840] #1: ffff8883d2d5fe10 ((work_completion)(&cq->work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x40a/0xaa0 [ 234.161003] #2: ffff8887ae5f6518 (&srv_sess->lock){+.+.}, at: rnbd_srv_rdma_ev+0x144/0x1590 [rnbd_server] [ 234.161168] stack backtrace: [ 234.161312] CPU: 1 PID: 618 Comm: kworker/1:1H Tainted: G O 5.4.84-storage #5.4.84-1+feature+linux+5.4.y+dbg+20201216.1319+b6b887b~deb10 [ 234.161490] Hardware name: Supermicro H8QG6/H8QG6, BIOS 3.00 09/04/2012 [ 234.161643] Workqueue: ib-comp-wq ib_cq_poll_work [ib_core] [ 234.161765] Call Trace: [ 234.161910] dump_stack+0x96/0xe0 [ 234.162028] check_noncircular+0x29e/0x2e0 [ 234.162148] ? print_circular_bug+0x100/0x100 [ 234.162267] ? register_lock_class+0x1ad/0x8a0 [ 234.162385] ? __lock_acquire+0x68e/0x23a0 [ 234.162505] ? trace_event_raw_event_lock+0x190/0x190 [ 234.162626] __lock_acquire+0x129e/0x23a0 [ 234.162746] ? register_lock_class+0x8a0/0x8a0 [ 234.162866] lock_acquire+0xf3/0x210 [ 234.162982] ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x40/0x80 [ 234.163127] __kernfs_remove+0x42b/0x4c0 [ 234.163243] ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x40/0x80 [ 234.163363] ? kernfs_fop_readdir+0x3b0/0x3b0 [ 234.163482] ? strlen+0x1f/0x40 [ 234.163596] ? strcmp+0x30/0x50 [ 234.163712] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x40/0x80 [ 234.163832] remove_files+0x3f/0xa0 [ 234.163948] sysfs_remove_group+0x4a/0xb0 [ 234.164068] rnbd_srv_destroy_dev_session_sysfs+0x19/0x30 [rnbd_server] [ 234.164196] rnbd_srv_rdma_ev+0x14c/0x1590 [rnbd_server] [ 234.164345] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x43/0x50 [ 234.164466] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x1a8/0x290 [ 234.164597] ? mlx4_ib_poll_cq+0x927/0x1280 [mlx4_ib] [ 234.164732] ? rnbd_get_sess_dev+0x270/0x270 [rnbd_server] [ 234.164859] process_io_req+0x29a/0x6a0 [rtrs_server] [ 234.164982] ? rnbd_get_sess_dev+0x270/0x270 [rnbd_server] [ 234.165130] __ib_process_cq+0x8c/0x100 [ib_core] [ 234.165279] ib_cq_poll_work+0x31/0xb0 [ib_core] [ 234.165404] process_one_work+0x4e5/0xaa0 [ 234.165550] ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x160/0x160 [ 234.165675] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x119/0x1d0 [ 234.165796] worker_thread+0x65/0x5c0 [ 234.165914] ? process_one_work+0xaa0/0xaa0 [ 234.166031] kthread+0x1e0/0x200 [ 234.166147] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0xc0/0xc0 [ 234.166268] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 [ 234.251591] rnbd_server L243: </dev/loop1@close_device_session>: Device closed [ 234.604221] rnbd_server L264: RTRS Session close_device_session disconnected Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@ionos.com> Signed-off-by: Md Haris Iqbal <haris.iqbal@ionos.com> Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@ionos.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210419073722.15351-10-gi-oh.kim@ionos.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

…xtent When cloning an inline extent there are a few cases, such as when we have an implicit hole at file offset 0, where we start a transaction while holding a read lock on a leaf. Starting the transaction results in a call to sb_start_intwrite(), which results in doing a read lock on a percpu semaphore. Lockdep doesn't like this and complains about it: [46.580704] ====================================================== [46.580752] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [46.580799] 5.13.0-rc1 #28 Not tainted [46.580832] ------------------------------------------------------ [46.580877] cloner/3835 is trying to acquire lock: [46.580918] c00000001301d638 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: clone_copy_inline_extent+0xe4/0x5a0 [46.581167] [46.581167] but task is already holding lock: [46.581217] c000000007fa2550 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x70/0x1d0 [46.581293] [46.581293] which lock already depends on the new lock. [46.581293] [46.581351] [46.581351] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [46.581410] [46.581410] -> #1 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}: [46.581464] down_read_nested+0x68/0x200 [46.581536] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x70/0x1d0 [46.581577] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x88/0x200 [46.581623] btrfs_search_slot+0x298/0xb70 [46.581665] btrfs_set_inode_index+0xfc/0x260 [46.581708] btrfs_new_inode+0x26c/0x950 [46.581749] btrfs_create+0xf4/0x2b0 [46.581782] lookup_open.isra.57+0x55c/0x6a0 [46.581855] path_openat+0x418/0xd20 [46.581888] do_filp_open+0x9c/0x130 [46.581920] do_sys_openat2+0x2ec/0x430 [46.581961] do_sys_open+0x90/0xc0 [46.581993] system_call_exception+0x3d4/0x410 [46.582037] system_call_common+0xec/0x278 [46.582078] [46.582078] -> #0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}: [46.582135] __lock_acquire+0x1e90/0x2c50 [46.582176] lock_acquire+0x2b4/0x5b0 [46.582263] start_transaction+0x3cc/0x950 [46.582308] clone_copy_inline_extent+0xe4/0x5a0 [46.582353] btrfs_clone+0x5fc/0x880 [46.582388] btrfs_clone_files+0xd8/0x1c0 [46.582434] btrfs_remap_file_range+0x3d8/0x590 [46.582481] do_clone_file_range+0x10c/0x270 [46.582558] vfs_clone_file_range+0x1b0/0x310 [46.582605] ioctl_file_clone+0x90/0x130 [46.582651] do_vfs_ioctl+0x874/0x1ac0 [46.582697] sys_ioctl+0x6c/0x120 [46.582733] system_call_exception+0x3d4/0x410 [46.582777] system_call_common+0xec/0x278 [46.582822] [46.582822] other info that might help us debug this: [46.582822] [46.582888] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [46.582888] [46.582942] CPU0 CPU1 [46.582984] ---- ---- [46.583028] lock(btrfs-tree-00); [46.583062] lock(sb_internal#2); [46.583119] lock(btrfs-tree-00); [46.583174] lock(sb_internal#2); [46.583212] [46.583212] *** DEADLOCK *** [46.583212] [46.583266] 6 locks held by cloner/3835: [46.583299] #0: c00000001301d448 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ioctl_file_clone+0x90/0x130 [46.583382] #1: c00000000f6d3768 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_two_nondirectories+0x58/0xc0 [46.583477] #2: c00000000f6d72a8 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#15/4){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_two_nondirectories+0x9c/0xc0 [46.583574] #3: c00000000f6d7138 (&ei->i_mmap_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_remap_file_range+0xd0/0x590 [46.583657] #4: c00000000f6d35f8 (&ei->i_mmap_lock/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_remap_file_range+0xe0/0x590 [46.583743] #5: c000000007fa2550 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x70/0x1d0 [46.583828] [46.583828] stack backtrace: [46.583872] CPU: 1 PID: 3835 Comm: cloner Not tainted 5.13.0-rc1 #28 [46.583931] Call Trace: [46.583955] [c0000000167c7200] [c000000000c1ee78] dump_stack+0xec/0x144 (unreliable) [46.584052] [c0000000167c7240] [c000000000274058] print_circular_bug.isra.32+0x3a8/0x400 [46.584123] [c0000000167c72e0] [c0000000002741f4] check_noncircular+0x144/0x190 [46.584191] [c0000000167c73b0] [c000000000278fc0] __lock_acquire+0x1e90/0x2c50 [46.584259] [c0000000167c74f0] [c00000000027aa94] lock_acquire+0x2b4/0x5b0 [46.584317] [c0000000167c75e0] [c000000000a0d6cc] start_transaction+0x3cc/0x950 [46.584388] [c0000000167c7690] [c000000000af47a4] clone_copy_inline_extent+0xe4/0x5a0 [46.584457] [c0000000167c77c0] [c000000000af525c] btrfs_clone+0x5fc/0x880 [46.584514] [c0000000167c7990] [c000000000af5698] btrfs_clone_files+0xd8/0x1c0 [46.584583] [c0000000167c7a00] [c000000000af5b58] btrfs_remap_file_range+0x3d8/0x590 [46.584652] [c0000000167c7ae0] [c0000000005d81dc] do_clone_file_range+0x10c/0x270 [46.584722] [c0000000167c7b40] [c0000000005d84f0] vfs_clone_file_range+0x1b0/0x310 [46.584793] [c0000000167c7bb0] [c00000000058bf80] ioctl_file_clone+0x90/0x130 [46.584861] [c0000000167c7c10] [c00000000058c894] do_vfs_ioctl+0x874/0x1ac0 [46.584922] [c0000000167c7d10] [c00000000058db4c] sys_ioctl+0x6c/0x120 [46.584978] [c0000000167c7d60] [c0000000000364a4] system_call_exception+0x3d4/0x410 [46.585046] [c0000000167c7e10] [c00000000000d45c] system_call_common+0xec/0x278 [46.585114] --- interrupt: c00 at 0x7ffff7e22990 [46.585160] NIP: 00007ffff7e22990 LR: 00000001000010ec CTR: 0000000000000000 [46.585224] REGS: c0000000167c7e80 TRAP: 0c00 Not tainted (5.13.0-rc1) [46.585280] MSR: 800000000280f033 <SF,VEC,VSX,EE,PR,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 28000244 XER: 00000000 [46.585374] IRQMASK: 0 [46.585374] GPR00: 0000000000000036 00007fffffffdec0 00007ffff7f17100 0000000000000004 [46.585374] GPR04: 000000008020940d 00007fffffffdf40 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [46.585374] GPR08: 0000000000000004 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [46.585374] GPR12: 0000000000000000 00007ffff7ffa940 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [46.585374] GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [46.585374] GPR20: 0000000000000000 000000009123683e 00007fffffffdf40 0000000000000000 [46.585374] GPR24: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000004 [46.585374] GPR28: 0000000100030260 0000000100030280 0000000000000003 000000000000005f [46.585919] NIP [00007ffff7e22990] 0x7ffff7e22990 [46.585964] LR [00000001000010ec] 0x1000010ec [46.586010] --- interrupt: c00 This should be a false positive, as both locks are acquired in read mode. Nevertheless, we don't need to hold a leaf locked when we start the transaction, so just release the leaf (path) before starting it. Reported-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20210513214404.xks77p566fglzgum@riteshh-domain/ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

When amdgpu_ib_ring_tests failed, the reset logic called amdgpu_device_ip_suspend twice, then deadlock occurred. Deadlock log: [ 805.655192] amdgpu 0000:04:00.0: amdgpu: ib ring test failed (-110). [ 806.290952] [drm] free PSP TMR buffer [ 806.319406] ============================================ [ 806.320315] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 806.321225] 5.11.0-custom #1 Tainted: G W OEL [ 806.322135] -------------------------------------------- [ 806.323043] cat/2593 is trying to acquire lock: [ 806.323825] ffff888136b1cdc8 (&adev->dm.dc_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dm_suspend+0xb8/0x1d0 [amdgpu] [ 806.325668] but task is already holding lock: [ 806.326664] ffff888136b1cdc8 (&adev->dm.dc_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dm_suspend+0xb8/0x1d0 [amdgpu] [ 806.328430] other info that might help us debug this: [ 806.329539] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 806.330549] CPU0 [ 806.330983] ---- [ 806.331416] lock(&adev->dm.dc_lock); [ 806.332086] lock(&adev->dm.dc_lock); [ 806.332738] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 806.333747] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 806.334899] 3 locks held by cat/2593: [ 806.335537] #0: ffff888100d3f1b8 (&attr->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: simple_attr_read+0x4e/0x110 [ 806.337009] #1: ffff888136b1fd78 (&adev->reset_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_device_lock_adev+0x42/0x94 [amdgpu] [ 806.339018] #2: ffff888136b1cdc8 (&adev->dm.dc_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dm_suspend+0xb8/0x1d0 [amdgpu] [ 806.340869] stack backtrace: [ 806.341621] CPU: 6 PID: 2593 Comm: cat Tainted: G W OEL 5.11.0-custom #1 [ 806.342921] Hardware name: AMD Celadon-CZN/Celadon-CZN, BIOS WLD0C23N_Weekly_20_12_2 12/23/2020 [ 806.344413] Call Trace: [ 806.344849] dump_stack+0x93/0xbd [ 806.345435] __lock_acquire.cold+0x18a/0x2cf [ 806.346179] lock_acquire+0xca/0x390 [ 806.346807] ? dm_suspend+0xb8/0x1d0 [amdgpu] [ 806.347813] __mutex_lock+0x9b/0x930 [ 806.348454] ? dm_suspend+0xb8/0x1d0 [amdgpu] [ 806.349434] ? amdgpu_device_indirect_rreg+0x58/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 806.350581] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x47/0x50 [ 806.351437] ? dm_suspend+0xb8/0x1d0 [amdgpu] [ 806.352437] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x4f/0x80 [ 806.353252] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x4f/0x80 [ 806.354064] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 [ 806.354747] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 [ 806.355457] dm_suspend+0xb8/0x1d0 [amdgpu] [ 806.356427] ? soc15_common_set_clockgating_state+0x17d/0x19 [amdgpu] [ 806.357736] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase1+0x78/0xd0 [amdgpu] [ 806.360394] amdgpu_device_ip_suspend+0x21/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 806.362926] amdgpu_device_pre_asic_reset+0xb3/0x270 [amdgpu] [ 806.365560] amdgpu_device_gpu_recover.cold+0x679/0x8eb [amdgpu] Signed-off-by: Lang Yu <Lang.Yu@amd.com> Acked-by: Christian KÃnig <christian.koenig@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>

Commit f5ce815 ("scsi: target: tcmu: Support DATA_BLOCK_SIZE = N * PAGE_SIZE") introduced xas_next() calls to iterate xarray elements. These calls triggered the WARNING "suspicious RCU usage" at tcmu device set up [1]. In the call stack of xas_next(), xas_load() was called. According to its comment, this function requires "the xa_lock or the RCU lock". To avoid the warning: - Guard the small loop calling xas_next() in tcmu_get_empty_block with RCU lock. - In the large loop in tcmu_copy_data using RCU lock would possibly disable preemtion for a long time (copy multi MBs). Therefore replace XA_STATE, xas_set and xas_next with a single xa_load. [1] [ 1899.867091] ============================= [ 1899.871199] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 1899.875310] 5.13.0-rc1+ #41 Not tainted [ 1899.879222] ----------------------------- [ 1899.883299] include/linux/xarray.h:1182 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! [ 1899.890940] other info that might help us debug this: [ 1899.899082] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 1899.905719] 3 locks held by kworker/0:1/1368: [ 1899.910161] #0: ffffa1f8c8b98738 ((wq_completion)target_submission){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1ee/0x580 [ 1899.920732] #1: ffffbd7040cd7e78 ((work_completion)(&q->sq.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1ee/0x580 [ 1899.931146] #2: ffffa1f8d1c99768 (&udev->cmdr_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: tcmu_queue_cmd+0xea/0x160 [target_core_user] [ 1899.941678] stack backtrace: [ 1899.946093] CPU: 0 PID: 1368 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc1+ #41 [ 1899.953070] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/PRIME Z270-A, BIOS 1302 03/15/2018 [ 1899.962459] Workqueue: target_submission target_queued_submit_work [target_core_mod] [ 1899.970337] Call Trace: [ 1899.972839] dump_stack+0x6d/0x89 [ 1899.976222] xas_descend+0x10e/0x120 [ 1899.979875] xas_load+0x39/0x50 [ 1899.983077] tcmu_get_empty_blocks+0x115/0x1c0 [target_core_user] [ 1899.989318] queue_cmd_ring+0x1da/0x630 [target_core_user] [ 1899.994897] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x70 [ 1899.999695] ? trace_kmalloc+0xa6/0xd0 [ 1900.003501] ? __kmalloc+0x205/0x380 [ 1900.007167] tcmu_queue_cmd+0x12f/0x160 [target_core_user] [ 1900.012746] __target_execute_cmd+0x23/0xa0 [target_core_mod] [ 1900.018589] transport_generic_new_cmd+0x1f3/0x370 [target_core_mod] [ 1900.025046] transport_handle_cdb_direct+0x34/0x50 [target_core_mod] [ 1900.031517] target_queued_submit_work+0x43/0xe0 [target_core_mod] [ 1900.037837] process_one_work+0x268/0x580 [ 1900.041952] ? process_one_work+0x580/0x580 [ 1900.046195] worker_thread+0x55/0x3b0 [ 1900.049921] ? process_one_work+0x580/0x580 [ 1900.054192] kthread+0x143/0x160 [ 1900.057499] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x40/0x40 [ 1900.062661] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210519135440.26773-1-bostroesser@gmail.com Fixes: f5ce815 ("scsi: target: tcmu: Support DATA_BLOCK_SIZE = N * PAGE_SIZE") Reported-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Bodo Stroesser <bostroesser@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>

Function skb_ext_add() doesn't initialize created skb extension with any value and leaves it up to the user. However, since extension of type TC_SKB_EXT originally contained only single value tc_skb_ext->chain its users used to just assign the chain value without setting whole extension memory to zero first. This assumption changed when TC_SKB_EXT extension was extended with additional fields but not all users were updated to initialize the new fields which leads to use of uninitialized memory afterwards. UBSAN log: [ 778.299821] UBSAN: invalid-load in net/openvswitch/flow.c:899:28 [ 778.301495] load of value 107 is not a valid value for type '_Bool' [ 778.303215] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc7+ #2 [ 778.304933] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 778.307901] Call Trace: [ 778.308680] <IRQ> [ 778.309358] dump_stack+0xbb/0x107 [ 778.310307] ubsan_epilogue+0x5/0x40 [ 778.311167] __ubsan_handle_load_invalid_value.cold+0x43/0x48 [ 778.312454] ? memset+0x20/0x40 [ 778.313230] ovs_flow_key_extract.cold+0xf/0x14 [openvswitch] [ 778.314532] ovs_vport_receive+0x19e/0x2e0 [openvswitch] [ 778.315749] ? ovs_vport_find_upcall_portid+0x330/0x330 [openvswitch] [ 778.317188] ? create_prof_cpu_mask+0x20/0x20 [ 778.318220] ? arch_stack_walk+0x82/0xf0 [ 778.319153] ? secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xb0/0xbb [ 778.320399] ? stack_trace_save+0x91/0xc0 [ 778.321362] ? stack_trace_consume_entry+0x160/0x160 [ 778.322517] ? lock_release+0x52e/0x760 [ 778.323444] netdev_frame_hook+0x323/0x610 [openvswitch] [ 778.324668] ? ovs_netdev_get_vport+0xe0/0xe0 [openvswitch] [ 778.325950] __netif_receive_skb_core+0x771/0x2db0 [ 778.327067] ? lock_downgrade+0x6e0/0x6f0 [ 778.328021] ? lock_acquire+0x565/0x720 [ 778.328940] ? generic_xdp_tx+0x4f0/0x4f0 [ 778.329902] ? inet_gro_receive+0x2a7/0x10a0 [ 778.330914] ? lock_downgrade+0x6f0/0x6f0 [ 778.331867] ? udp4_gro_receive+0x4c4/0x13e0 [ 778.332876] ? lock_release+0x52e/0x760 [ 778.333808] ? dev_gro_receive+0xcc8/0x2380 [ 778.334810] ? lock_downgrade+0x6f0/0x6f0 [ 778.335769] __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x295/0x820 [ 778.336955] ? process_backlog+0x780/0x780 [ 778.337941] ? mlx5e_rep_tc_netdevice_event_unregister+0x20/0x20 [mlx5_core] [ 778.339613] ? seqcount_lockdep_reader_access.constprop.0+0xa7/0xc0 [ 778.341033] ? kvm_clock_get_cycles+0x14/0x20 [ 778.342072] netif_receive_skb_list_internal+0x5f5/0xcb0 [ 778.343288] ? __kasan_kmalloc+0x7a/0x90 [ 778.344234] ? mlx5e_handle_rx_cqe_mpwrq+0x9e0/0x9e0 [mlx5_core] [ 778.345676] ? mlx5e_xmit_xdp_frame_mpwqe+0x14d0/0x14d0 [mlx5_core] [ 778.347140] ? __netif_receive_skb_list_core+0x820/0x820 [ 778.348351] ? mlx5e_post_rx_mpwqes+0xa6/0x25d0 [mlx5_core] [ 778.349688] ? napi_gro_flush+0x26c/0x3c0 [ 778.350641] napi_complete_done+0x188/0x6b0 [ 778.351627] mlx5e_napi_poll+0x373/0x1b80 [mlx5_core] [ 778.352853] __napi_poll+0x9f/0x510 [ 778.353704] ? mlx5_flow_namespace_set_mode+0x260/0x260 [mlx5_core] [ 778.355158] net_rx_action+0x34c/0xa40 [ 778.356060] ? napi_threaded_poll+0x3d0/0x3d0 [ 778.357083] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x190 [ 778.358041] ? __common_interrupt+0x8e/0x1a0 [ 778.359045] __do_softirq+0x1ce/0x984 [ 778.359938] __irq_exit_rcu+0x137/0x1d0 [ 778.360865] irq_exit_rcu+0xa/0x20 [ 778.361708] common_interrupt+0x80/0xa0 [ 778.362640] </IRQ> [ 778.363212] asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40 [ 778.364204] RIP: 0010:native_safe_halt+0xe/0x10 [ 778.365273] Code: 4f ff ff ff 4c 89 e7 e8 50 3f 40 fe e9 dc fe ff ff 48 89 df e8 43 3f 40 fe eb 90 cc e9 07 00 00 00 0f 00 2d 74 05 62 00 fb f4 <c3> 90 e9 07 00 00 00 0f 00 2d 64 05 62 00 f4 c3 cc cc 0f 1f 44 00 [ 778.369355] RSP: 0018:ffffffff84407e48 EFLAGS: 00000246 [ 778.370570] RAX: ffff88842de46a80 RBX: ffffffff84425840 RCX: ffffffff83418468 [ 778.372143] RDX: 000000000026f1da RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: ffffffff8343af5e [ 778.373722] RBP: fffffbfff0884b08 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff88842de46bcb [ 778.375292] R10: ffffed1085bc8d79 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 778.376860] R13: ffffffff851124a0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: dffffc0000000000 [ 778.378491] ? rcu_eqs_enter.constprop.0+0xb8/0xe0 [ 778.379606] ? default_idle_call+0x5e/0xe0 [ 778.380578] default_idle+0xa/0x10 [ 778.381406] default_idle_call+0x96/0xe0 [ 778.382350] do_idle+0x3d4/0x550 [ 778.383153] ? arch_cpu_idle_exit+0x40/0x40 [ 778.384143] cpu_startup_entry+0x19/0x20 [ 778.385078] start_kernel+0x3c7/0x3e5 [ 778.385978] secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xb0/0xbb Fix the issue by providing new function tc_skb_ext_alloc() that allocates tc skb extension and initializes its memory to 0 before returning it to the caller. Change all existing users to use new API instead of calling skb_ext_add() directly. Fixes: 038ebb1 ("net/sched: act_ct: fix miss set mru for ovs after defrag in act_ct") Fixes: d29334c ("net/sched: act_api: fix miss set post_ct for ovs after do conntrack in act_ct") Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

…/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD KVM/arm64 fixes for 5.13, take #2 - Another state update on exit to userspace fix - Prevent the creation of mixed 32/64 VMs

…asid() While digesting the XSAVE-related horrors which got introduced with the supervisor/user split, the recent addition of ENQCMD-related functionality got on the radar and turned out to be similarly broken. update_pasid(), which is only required when X86_FEATURE_ENQCMD is available, is invoked from two places: 1) From switch_to() for the incoming task 2) Via a SMP function call from the IOMMU/SMV code #1 is half-ways correct as it hacks around the brokenness of get_xsave_addr() by enforcing the state to be 'present', but all the conditionals in that code are completely pointless for that. Also the invocation is just useless overhead because at that point it's guaranteed that TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD is set on the incoming task and all of this can be handled at return to user space. #2 is broken beyond repair. The comment in the code claims that it is safe to invoke this in an IPI, but that's just wishful thinking. FPU state of a running task is protected by fregs_lock() which is nothing else than a local_bh_disable(). As BH-disabled regions run usually with interrupts enabled the IPI can hit a code section which modifies FPU state and there is absolutely no guarantee that any of the assumptions which are made for the IPI case is true. Also the IPI is sent to all CPUs in mm_cpumask(mm), but the IPI is invoked with a NULL pointer argument, so it can hit a completely unrelated task and unconditionally force an update for nothing. Worse, it can hit a kernel thread which operates on a user space address space and set a random PASID for it. The offending commit does not cleanly revert, but it's sufficient to force disable X86_FEATURE_ENQCMD and to remove the broken update_pasid() code to make this dysfunctional all over the place. Anything more complex would require more surgery and none of the related functions outside of the x86 core code are blatantly wrong, so removing those would be overkill. As nothing enables the PASID bit in the IA32_XSS MSR yet, which is required to make this actually work, this cannot result in a regression except for related out of tree train-wrecks, but they are broken already today. Fixes: 20f0afd ("x86/mmu: Allocate/free a PASID") Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87mtsd6gr9.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de

ASan reported a memory leak caused by info_linear not being deallocated. The info_linear was allocated during in perf_event__synthesize_one_bpf_prog(). This patch adds the corresponding free() when bpf_prog_info_node is freed in perf_env__purge_bpf(). $ sudo ./perf record -- sleep 5 [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.025 MB perf.data (8 samples) ] ================================================================= ==297735==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks Direct leak of 7688 byte(s) in 19 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x4f420f in malloc (/home/user/linux/tools/perf/perf+0x4f420f) #1 0xc06a74 in bpf_program__get_prog_info_linear /home/user/linux/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c:11113:16 #2 0xb426fe in perf_event__synthesize_one_bpf_prog /home/user/linux/tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c:191:16 #3 0xb42008 in perf_event__synthesize_bpf_events /home/user/linux/tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c:410:9 #4 0x594596 in record__synthesize /home/user/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:1490:8 #5 0x58c9ac in __cmd_record /home/user/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:1798:8 #6 0x58990b in cmd_record /home/user/linux/tools/perf/builtin-record.c:2901:8 #7 0x7b2a20 in run_builtin /home/user/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:313:11 #8 0x7b12ff in handle_internal_command /home/user/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:365:8 #9 0x7b2583 in run_argv /home/user/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:409:2 #10 0x7b0d79 in main /home/user/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:539:3 #11 0x7fa357ef6b74 in __libc_start_main /usr/src/debug/glibc-2.33-8.fc34.x86_64/csu/../csu/libc-start.c:332:16 Signed-off-by: Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@gmail.com> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210602224024.300485-1-rickyman7@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

Merge branch 'mlxsw-fixes' Ido Schimmel says: ==================== mlxsw: Thermal and qdisc fixes Patches #1-#2 fix wrong validation of burst size in qdisc code and a user triggerable WARN_ON(). Patch #3 fixes a regression in thermal monitoring of transceiver modules and gearboxes. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

When user space brings PKRU into init state, then the kernel handling is broken: T1 user space xsave(state) state.header.xfeatures &= ~XFEATURE_MASK_PKRU; xrstor(state) T1 -> kernel schedule() XSAVE(S) -> T1->xsave.header.xfeatures[PKRU] == 0 T1->flags |= TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD; wrpkru(); schedule() ... pk = get_xsave_addr(&T1->fpu->state.xsave, XFEATURE_PKRU); if (pk) wrpkru(pk->pkru); else wrpkru(DEFAULT_PKRU); Because the xfeatures bit is 0 and therefore the value in the xsave storage is not valid, get_xsave_addr() returns NULL and switch_to() writes the default PKRU. -> FAIL #1! So that wrecks any copy_to/from_user() on the way back to user space which hits memory which is protected by the default PKRU value. Assumed that this does not fail (pure luck) then T1 goes back to user space and because TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD is set it ends up in switch_fpu_return() __fpregs_load_activate() if (!fpregs_state_valid()) { load_XSTATE_from_task(); } But if nothing touched the FPU between T1 scheduling out and back in, then the fpregs_state is still valid which means switch_fpu_return() does nothing and just clears TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD. Back to user space with DEFAULT_PKRU loaded. -> FAIL #2! The fix is simple: if get_xsave_addr() returns NULL then set the PKRU value to 0 instead of the restrictive default PKRU value in init_pkru_value. [ bp: Massage in minor nitpicks from folks. ] Fixes: 0cecca9 ("x86/fpu: Eager switch PKRU state") Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Tested-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210608144346.045616965@linutronix.de

ASan reported a memory leak of BPF-related ksymbols map and dso. The leak is caused by refount never reaching 0, due to missing __put calls in the function machine__process_ksymbol_register. Once the dso is inserted in the map, dso__put() should be called (map__new2() increases the refcount to 2). The same thing applies for the map when it's inserted into maps (maps__insert() increases the refcount to 2). $ sudo ./perf record -- sleep 5 [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.025 MB perf.data (8 samples) ] ================================================================= ==297735==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks Direct leak of 6992 byte(s) in 19 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x4f43c7 in calloc (/home/user/linux/tools/perf/perf+0x4f43c7) #1 0x8e4e53 in map__new2 /home/user/linux/tools/perf/util/map.c:216:20 #2 0x8cf68c in machine__process_ksymbol_register /home/user/linux/tools/perf/util/machine.c:778:10 [...] Indirect leak of 8702 byte(s) in 19 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x4f43c7 in calloc (/home/user/linux/tools/perf/perf+0x4f43c7) #1 0x8728d7 in dso__new_id /home/user/linux/tools/perf/util/dso.c:1256:20 #2 0x872015 in dso__new /home/user/linux/tools/perf/util/dso.c:1295:9 #3 0x8cf623 in machine__process_ksymbol_register /home/user/linux/tools/perf/util/machine.c:774:21 [...] Indirect leak of 1520 byte(s) in 19 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x4f43c7 in calloc (/home/user/linux/tools/perf/perf+0x4f43c7) #1 0x87b3da in symbol__new /home/user/linux/tools/perf/util/symbol.c:269:23 #2 0x888954 in map__process_kallsym_symbol /home/user/linux/tools/perf/util/symbol.c:710:8 [...] Indirect leak of 1406 byte(s) in 19 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x4f43c7 in calloc (/home/user/linux/tools/perf/perf+0x4f43c7) #1 0x87b3da in symbol__new /home/user/linux/tools/perf/util/symbol.c:269:23 #2 0x8cfbd8 in machine__process_ksymbol_register /home/user/linux/tools/perf/util/machine.c:803:8 [...] Signed-off-by: Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@gmail.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Cc: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Tommi Rantala <tommi.t.rantala@nokia.com> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210612173751.188582-1-rickyman7@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

This reverts commit 1815d9c. Unfortunately this inverts the locking hierarchy, so back to the drawing board. Full lockdep splat below: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.13.0-rc7-CI-CI_DRM_10254+ #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kms_frontbuffer/1087 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88810dcd01a8 (&dev->master_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_is_current_master+0x1b/0x40 but task is already holding lock: ffff88810dcd0488 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_mode_getconnector+0x1c6/0x4a0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xab/0x970 drm_client_modeset_probe+0x22e/0xca0 __drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x42/0x540 intel_fbdev_initial_config+0xf/0x20 [i915] async_run_entry_fn+0x28/0x130 process_one_work+0x26d/0x5c0 worker_thread+0x37/0x380 kthread+0x144/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 (&client->modeset_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xab/0x970 drm_client_modeset_commit_locked+0x1c/0x180 drm_client_modeset_commit+0x1c/0x40 __drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x88/0xb0 drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x34/0x40 intel_fbdev_set_par+0x11/0x40 [i915] fbcon_init+0x270/0x4f0 visual_init+0xc6/0x130 do_bind_con_driver+0x1e5/0x2d0 do_take_over_console+0x10e/0x180 do_fbcon_takeover+0x53/0xb0 register_framebuffer+0x22d/0x310 __drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x36c/0x540 intel_fbdev_initial_config+0xf/0x20 [i915] async_run_entry_fn+0x28/0x130 process_one_work+0x26d/0x5c0 worker_thread+0x37/0x380 kthread+0x144/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 (&dev->master_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x151e/0x2590 lock_acquire+0xd1/0x3d0 __mutex_lock+0xab/0x970 drm_is_current_master+0x1b/0x40 drm_mode_getconnector+0x37e/0x4a0 drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa8/0xf0 drm_ioctl+0x1e8/0x390 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x6a/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &dev->master_mutex --> &client->modeset_mutex --> &dev->mode_config.mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex); lock(&client->modeset_mutex); lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex); lock(&dev->master_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by kms_frontbuffer/1087: #0: ffff88810dcd0488 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_mode_getconnector+0x1c6/0x4a0 stack backtrace: CPU: 7 PID: 1087 Comm: kms_frontbuffer Not tainted 5.13.0-rc7-CI-CI_DRM_10254+ #1 Hardware name: Intel Corporation Ice Lake Client Platform/IceLake U DDR4 SODIMM PD RVP TLC, BIOS ICLSFWR1.R00.3234.A01.1906141750 06/14/2019 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x7f/0xad check_noncircular+0x12e/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x151e/0x2590 lock_acquire+0xd1/0x3d0 __mutex_lock+0xab/0x970 drm_is_current_master+0x1b/0x40 drm_mode_getconnector+0x37e/0x4a0 drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa8/0xf0 drm_ioctl+0x1e8/0x390 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x6a/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Note that this broke the intel-gfx CI pretty much across the board because it has to reboot machines after it hits a lockdep splat. Testcase: igt/debugfs_test/read_all_entries Acked-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com> Fixes: 1815d9c ("drm: add a locked version of drm_is_current_master") Cc: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> Cc: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210622075409.2673805-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch

The XSAVE init code initializes all enabled and supported components with XRSTOR(S) to init state. Then it XSAVEs the state of the components back into init_fpstate which is used in several places to fill in the init state of components. This works correctly with XSAVE, but not with XSAVEOPT and XSAVES because those use the init optimization and skip writing state of components which are in init state. So init_fpstate.xsave still contains all zeroes after this operation. There are two ways to solve that: 1) Use XSAVE unconditionally, but that requires to reshuffle the buffer when XSAVES is enabled because XSAVES uses compacted format. 2) Save the components which are known to have a non-zero init state by other means. Looking deeper, #2 is the right thing to do because all components the kernel supports have all-zeroes init state except the legacy features (FP, SSE). Those cannot be hard coded because the states are not identical on all CPUs, but they can be saved with FXSAVE which avoids all conditionals. Use FXSAVE to save the legacy FP/SSE components in init_fpstate along with a BUILD_BUG_ON() which reminds developers to validate that a newly added component has all zeroes init state. As a bonus remove the now unused copy_xregs_to_kernel_booting() crutch. The XSAVE and reshuffle method can still be implemented in the unlikely case that components are added which have a non-zero init state and no other means to save them. For now, FXSAVE is just simple and good enough. [ bp: Fix a typo or two in the text. ] Fixes: 6bad06b ("x86, xsave: Use xsaveopt in context-switch path when supported") Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210618143444.587311343@linutronix.de

[ Upstream commit 85e8b03 ] syzbot complained in neigh_reduce(), because rcu_read_lock_bh() is treated differently than rcu_read_lock() WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 5.13.0-rc6-syzkaller #0 Not tainted ----------------------------- include/net/addrconf.h:313 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 3 locks held by kworker/0:0/5: #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: arch_atomic64_set arch/x86/include/asm/atomic64_64.h:34 [inline] #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: atomic64_set include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:856 [inline] #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: atomic_long_set include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:41 [inline] #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: set_work_data kernel/workqueue.c:617 [inline] #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: set_work_pool_and_clear_pending kernel/workqueue.c:644 [inline] #0: ffff888011064d38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x871/0x1600 kernel/workqueue.c:2247 #1: ffffc90000ca7da8 ((work_completion)(&port->wq)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x8a5/0x1600 kernel/workqueue.c:2251 #2: ffffffff8bf795c0 (rcu_read_lock_bh){....}-{1:2}, at: __dev_queue_xmit+0x1da/0x3130 net/core/dev.c:4180 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 5 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc6-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Workqueue: events ipvlan_process_multicast Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline] dump_stack+0x141/0x1d7 lib/dump_stack.c:120 __in6_dev_get include/net/addrconf.h:313 [inline] __in6_dev_get include/net/addrconf.h:311 [inline] neigh_reduce drivers/net/vxlan.c:2167 [inline] vxlan_xmit+0x34d5/0x4c30 drivers/net/vxlan.c:2919 __netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4944 [inline] netdev_start_xmit include/linux/netdevice.h:4958 [inline] xmit_one net/core/dev.c:3654 [inline] dev_hard_start_xmit+0x1eb/0x920 net/core/dev.c:3670 __dev_queue_xmit+0x2133/0x3130 net/core/dev.c:4246 ipvlan_process_multicast+0xa99/0xd70 drivers/net/ipvlan/ipvlan_core.c:287 process_one_work+0x98d/0x1600 kernel/workqueue.c:2276 worker_thread+0x64c/0x1120 kernel/workqueue.c:2422 kthread+0x3b1/0x4a0 kernel/kthread.c:313 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:294 Fixes: f564f45 ("vxlan: add ipv6 proxy support") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit d676598 ] Patch was based on wrong presumption that be_poll can be called only from bh context. It reintroducing old regression (also reverted) and causing deadlock when we use netconsole with benet in bonding. Old revert: commit 072a9c4 ("netpoll: revert 6bdb7fe and fix be_poll() instead") [ 331.269715] bond0: (slave enp0s7f0): Releasing backup interface [ 331.270121] CPU: 4 PID: 1479 Comm: ifenslave Not tainted 5.13.0-rc7+ #2 [ 331.270122] Call Trace: [ 331.270122] [c00000001789f200] [c0000000008c505c] dump_stack+0x100/0x174 (unreliable) [ 331.270124] [c00000001789f240] [c008000001238b9c] be_poll+0x64/0xe90 [be2net] [ 331.270125] [c00000001789f330] [c000000000d1e6e4] netpoll_poll_dev+0x174/0x3d0 [ 331.270127] [c00000001789f400] [c008000001bc167c] bond_poll_controller+0xb4/0x130 [bonding] [ 331.270128] [c00000001789f450] [c000000000d1e624] netpoll_poll_dev+0xb4/0x3d0 [ 331.270129] [c00000001789f520] [c000000000d1ed88] netpoll_send_skb+0x448/0x470 [ 331.270130] [c00000001789f5d0] [c0080000011f14f8] write_msg+0x180/0x1b0 [netconsole] [ 331.270131] [c00000001789f640] [c000000000230c0c] console_unlock+0x54c/0x790 [ 331.270132] [c00000001789f7b0] [c000000000233098] vprintk_emit+0x2d8/0x450 [ 331.270133] [c00000001789f810] [c000000000234758] vprintk+0xc8/0x270 [ 331.270134] [c00000001789f850] [c000000000233c28] printk+0x40/0x54 [ 331.270135] [c00000001789f870] [c000000000ccf908] __netdev_printk+0x150/0x198 [ 331.270136] [c00000001789f910] [c000000000ccfdb4] netdev_info+0x68/0x94 [ 331.270137] [c00000001789f950] [c008000001bcbd70] __bond_release_one+0x188/0x6b0 [bonding] [ 331.270138] [c00000001789faa0] [c008000001bcc6f4] bond_do_ioctl+0x42c/0x490 [bonding] [ 331.270139] [c00000001789fb60] [c000000000d0d17c] dev_ifsioc+0x17c/0x400 [ 331.270140] [c00000001789fbc0] [c000000000d0db70] dev_ioctl+0x390/0x890 [ 331.270141] [c00000001789fc10] [c000000000c7c76c] sock_do_ioctl+0xac/0x1b0 [ 331.270142] [c00000001789fc90] [c000000000c7ffac] sock_ioctl+0x31c/0x6e0 [ 331.270143] [c00000001789fd60] [c0000000005b9728] sys_ioctl+0xf8/0x150 [ 331.270145] [c00000001789fdb0] [c0000000000336c0] system_call_exception+0x160/0x2f0 [ 331.270146] [c00000001789fe10] [c00000000000d35c] system_call_common+0xec/0x278 [ 331.270147] --- interrupt: c00 at 0x7fffa6c6ec00 [ 331.270147] NIP: 00007fffa6c6ec00 LR: 0000000105c4185c CTR: 0000000000000000 [ 331.270148] REGS: c00000001789fe80 TRAP: 0c00 Not tainted (5.13.0-rc7+) [ 331.270148] MSR: 800000000280f033 <SF,VEC,VSX,EE,PR,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 28000428 XER: 00000000 [ 331.270155] IRQMASK: 0 [ 331.270156] GPR00: 0000000000000036 00007fffd494d5b0 00007fffa6d57100 0000000000000003 [ 331.270158] GPR04: 0000000000008991 00007fffd494d6d0 0000000000000008 00007fffd494f28c [ 331.270161] GPR08: 0000000000000003 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [ 331.270164] GPR12: 0000000000000000 00007fffa6dfa220 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [ 331.270167] GPR16: 0000000105c44880 0000000000000000 0000000105c60088 0000000105c60318 [ 331.270170] GPR20: 0000000105c602c0 0000000105c44560 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 [ 331.270172] GPR24: 00007fffd494dc50 00007fffd494d6a8 0000000105c60008 00007fffd494d6d0 [ 331.270175] GPR28: 00007fffd494f27e 0000000105c6026c 00007fffd494f284 0000000000000000 [ 331.270178] NIP [00007fffa6c6ec00] 0x7fffa6c6ec00 [ 331.270178] LR [0000000105c4185c] 0x105c4185c [ 331.270179] --- interrupt: c00 This reverts commit d0d006a. Fixes: d0d006a ("be2net: disable bh with spin_lock in be_process_mcc") Signed-off-by: Petr Oros <poros@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

Static analysis reports this problem write.c:773:29: warning: Assigned value is garbage or undefined mapping->writeback_index = next; ^ ~~~~ The call to afs_writepages_region() can return without setting next. So check the function return before using next. Changes: ver #2: - Need to fix the range_cyclic case also[1]. Fixes: e87b03f ("afs: Prepare for use of THPs") Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210430155031.3287870-1-trix@redhat.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAB9dFdvHsLsw7CMnB+4cgciWDSqVjuij4mH3TaXnHQB8sz5rHw@mail.gmail.com/ [1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162609464716.3133237.10354897554363093252.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162610727640.3408253.8687445613469681311.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v2

At btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post() we call btrfs_find_all_roots() with a NULL value as the transaction handle argument, which makes that function take the commit_root_sem semaphore, which is necessary when we don't hold a transaction handle or any other mechanism to prevent a transaction commit from wiping out commit roots. However btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post() can be called in a context where we are holding a write lock on an extent buffer from a subvolume tree, namely from btrfs_truncate_inode_items(), called either during truncate or unlink operations. In this case we end up with a lock inversion problem because the commit_root_sem is a higher level lock, always supposed to be acquired before locking any extent buffer. Lockdep detects this lock inversion problem since we switched the extent buffer locks from custom locks to semaphores, and when running btrfs/158 from fstests, it reported the following trace: [ 9057.626435] ====================================================== [ 9057.627541] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 9057.628334] 5.14.0-rc2-btrfs-next-93 #1 Not tainted [ 9057.628961] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 9057.629867] kworker/u16:4/30781 is trying to acquire lock: [ 9057.630824] ffff8e2590f58760 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 9057.632542] but task is already holding lock: [ 9057.633551] ffff8e25582d4b70 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_extent_inodes+0x10b/0x280 [btrfs] [ 9057.635255] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 9057.636292] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 9057.637240] -> #1 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 9057.638138] down_read+0x46/0x140 [ 9057.638648] btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 [btrfs] [ 9057.639398] btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x37/0x70 [btrfs] [ 9057.640283] btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x418/0x490 [btrfs] [ 9057.641114] btrfs_free_extent+0x35/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 9057.641819] btrfs_truncate_inode_items+0x424/0xf70 [btrfs] [ 9057.642643] btrfs_evict_inode+0x454/0x4f0 [btrfs] [ 9057.643418] evict+0xcf/0x1d0 [ 9057.643895] do_unlinkat+0x1e9/0x300 [ 9057.644525] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 9057.645110] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 9057.645835] -> #0 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}: [ 9057.646600] __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210 [ 9057.647248] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310 [ 9057.647773] down_read_nested+0x4b/0x140 [ 9057.648350] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 9057.649175] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 [btrfs] [ 9057.650010] btrfs_search_slot+0x537/0xc00 [btrfs] [ 9057.650849] scrub_print_warning_inode+0x89/0x370 [btrfs] [ 9057.651733] iterate_extent_inodes+0x1e3/0x280 [btrfs] [ 9057.652501] scrub_print_warning+0x15d/0x2f0 [btrfs] [ 9057.653264] scrub_handle_errored_block.isra.0+0x135f/0x1640 [btrfs] [ 9057.654295] scrub_bio_end_io_worker+0x101/0x2e0 [btrfs] [ 9057.655111] btrfs_work_helper+0xf8/0x400 [btrfs] [ 9057.655831] process_one_work+0x247/0x5a0 [ 9057.656425] worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 [ 9057.656993] kthread+0x155/0x180 [ 9057.657494] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 9057.658030] other info that might help us debug this: [ 9057.659064] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 9057.659824] CPU0 CPU1 [ 9057.660402] ---- ---- [ 9057.660988] lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); [ 9057.661581] lock(btrfs-tree-00); [ 9057.662348] lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); [ 9057.663254] lock(btrfs-tree-00); [ 9057.663690] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 9057.664437] 4 locks held by kworker/u16:4/30781: [ 9057.665023] #0: ffff8e25922a1148 ((wq_completion)btrfs-scrub){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c7/0x5a0 [ 9057.666260] #1: ffffabb3451ffe70 ((work_completion)(&work->normal_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c7/0x5a0 [ 9057.667639] #2: ffff8e25922da198 (&ret->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: scrub_handle_errored_block.isra.0+0x5d2/0x1640 [btrfs] [ 9057.669017] #3: ffff8e25582d4b70 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_extent_inodes+0x10b/0x280 [btrfs] [ 9057.670408] stack backtrace: [ 9057.670976] CPU: 7 PID: 30781 Comm: kworker/u16:4 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2-btrfs-next-93 #1 [ 9057.672030] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 9057.673492] Workqueue: btrfs-scrub btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] [ 9057.674258] Call Trace: [ 9057.674588] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 [ 9057.675083] check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110 [ 9057.675611] __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210 [ 9057.676132] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310 [ 9057.676605] ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 9057.677313] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe8/0x140 [ 9057.677849] down_read_nested+0x4b/0x140 [ 9057.678349] ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 9057.679068] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 9057.679760] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 [btrfs] [ 9057.680458] btrfs_search_slot+0x537/0xc00 [btrfs] [ 9057.681083] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40 [ 9057.681594] ? btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0x11f/0x140 [btrfs] [ 9057.682336] scrub_print_warning_inode+0x89/0x370 [btrfs] [ 9057.683058] ? btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0x11f/0x140 [btrfs] [ 9057.683834] ? scrub_write_block_to_dev_replace+0xb0/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 9057.684632] iterate_extent_inodes+0x1e3/0x280 [btrfs] [ 9057.685316] scrub_print_warning+0x15d/0x2f0 [btrfs] [ 9057.685977] ? ___ratelimit+0xa4/0x110 [ 9057.686460] scrub_handle_errored_block.isra.0+0x135f/0x1640 [btrfs] [ 9057.687316] scrub_bio_end_io_worker+0x101/0x2e0 [btrfs] [ 9057.688021] btrfs_work_helper+0xf8/0x400 [btrfs] [ 9057.688649] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe8/0x140 [ 9057.689180] process_one_work+0x247/0x5a0 [ 9057.689696] worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 [ 9057.690175] ? process_one_work+0x5a0/0x5a0 [ 9057.690731] kthread+0x155/0x180 [ 9057.691158] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 [ 9057.691697] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Fix this by making btrfs_find_all_roots() never attempt to lock the commit_root_sem when it is called from btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post(). We can't just pass a non-NULL transaction handle to btrfs_find_all_roots() from btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post(), because that would make backref lookup not use commit roots and acquire read locks on extent buffers, and therefore could deadlock when btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post() is called from the btrfs_truncate_inode_items() code path which has acquired a write lock on an extent buffer of the subvolume btree. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

[ Upstream commit afe6949 ] Static analysis reports this problem write.c:773:29: warning: Assigned value is garbage or undefined mapping->writeback_index = next; ^ ~~~~ The call to afs_writepages_region() can return without setting next. So check the function return before using next. Changes: ver #2: - Need to fix the range_cyclic case also[1]. Fixes: e87b03f ("afs: Prepare for use of THPs") Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210430155031.3287870-1-trix@redhat.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAB9dFdvHsLsw7CMnB+4cgciWDSqVjuij4mH3TaXnHQB8sz5rHw@mail.gmail.com/ [1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162609464716.3133237.10354897554363093252.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162610727640.3408253.8687445613469681311.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v2 Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

commit 8949b9a upstream. At btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post() we call btrfs_find_all_roots() with a NULL value as the transaction handle argument, which makes that function take the commit_root_sem semaphore, which is necessary when we don't hold a transaction handle or any other mechanism to prevent a transaction commit from wiping out commit roots. However btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post() can be called in a context where we are holding a write lock on an extent buffer from a subvolume tree, namely from btrfs_truncate_inode_items(), called either during truncate or unlink operations. In this case we end up with a lock inversion problem because the commit_root_sem is a higher level lock, always supposed to be acquired before locking any extent buffer. Lockdep detects this lock inversion problem since we switched the extent buffer locks from custom locks to semaphores, and when running btrfs/158 from fstests, it reported the following trace: [ 9057.626435] ====================================================== [ 9057.627541] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 9057.628334] 5.14.0-rc2-btrfs-next-93 #1 Not tainted [ 9057.628961] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 9057.629867] kworker/u16:4/30781 is trying to acquire lock: [ 9057.630824] ffff8e2590f58760 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 9057.632542] but task is already holding lock: [ 9057.633551] ffff8e25582d4b70 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_extent_inodes+0x10b/0x280 [btrfs] [ 9057.635255] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 9057.636292] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 9057.637240] -> #1 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}: [ 9057.638138] down_read+0x46/0x140 [ 9057.638648] btrfs_find_all_roots+0x41/0x80 [btrfs] [ 9057.639398] btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post+0x37/0x70 [btrfs] [ 9057.640283] btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x418/0x490 [btrfs] [ 9057.641114] btrfs_free_extent+0x35/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 9057.641819] btrfs_truncate_inode_items+0x424/0xf70 [btrfs] [ 9057.642643] btrfs_evict_inode+0x454/0x4f0 [btrfs] [ 9057.643418] evict+0xcf/0x1d0 [ 9057.643895] do_unlinkat+0x1e9/0x300 [ 9057.644525] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 9057.645110] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 9057.645835] -> #0 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}: [ 9057.646600] __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210 [ 9057.647248] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310 [ 9057.647773] down_read_nested+0x4b/0x140 [ 9057.648350] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 9057.649175] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 [btrfs] [ 9057.650010] btrfs_search_slot+0x537/0xc00 [btrfs] [ 9057.650849] scrub_print_warning_inode+0x89/0x370 [btrfs] [ 9057.651733] iterate_extent_inodes+0x1e3/0x280 [btrfs] [ 9057.652501] scrub_print_warning+0x15d/0x2f0 [btrfs] [ 9057.653264] scrub_handle_errored_block.isra.0+0x135f/0x1640 [btrfs] [ 9057.654295] scrub_bio_end_io_worker+0x101/0x2e0 [btrfs] [ 9057.655111] btrfs_work_helper+0xf8/0x400 [btrfs] [ 9057.655831] process_one_work+0x247/0x5a0 [ 9057.656425] worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 [ 9057.656993] kthread+0x155/0x180 [ 9057.657494] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 9057.658030] other info that might help us debug this: [ 9057.659064] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 9057.659824] CPU0 CPU1 [ 9057.660402] ---- ---- [ 9057.660988] lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); [ 9057.661581] lock(btrfs-tree-00); [ 9057.662348] lock(&fs_info->commit_root_sem); [ 9057.663254] lock(btrfs-tree-00); [ 9057.663690] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 9057.664437] 4 locks held by kworker/u16:4/30781: [ 9057.665023] #0: ffff8e25922a1148 ((wq_completion)btrfs-scrub){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c7/0x5a0 [ 9057.666260] #1: ffffabb3451ffe70 ((work_completion)(&work->normal_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c7/0x5a0 [ 9057.667639] #2: ffff8e25922da198 (&ret->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: scrub_handle_errored_block.isra.0+0x5d2/0x1640 [btrfs] [ 9057.669017] #3: ffff8e25582d4b70 (&fs_info->commit_root_sem){++++}-{3:3}, at: iterate_extent_inodes+0x10b/0x280 [btrfs] [ 9057.670408] stack backtrace: [ 9057.670976] CPU: 7 PID: 30781 Comm: kworker/u16:4 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2-btrfs-next-93 #1 [ 9057.672030] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 9057.673492] Workqueue: btrfs-scrub btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] [ 9057.674258] Call Trace: [ 9057.674588] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 [ 9057.675083] check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110 [ 9057.675611] __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210 [ 9057.676132] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310 [ 9057.676605] ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 9057.677313] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe8/0x140 [ 9057.677849] down_read_nested+0x4b/0x140 [ 9057.678349] ? __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 9057.679068] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 9057.679760] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 [btrfs] [ 9057.680458] btrfs_search_slot+0x537/0xc00 [btrfs] [ 9057.681083] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40 [ 9057.681594] ? btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0x11f/0x140 [btrfs] [ 9057.682336] scrub_print_warning_inode+0x89/0x370 [btrfs] [ 9057.683058] ? btrfs_find_all_roots_safe+0x11f/0x140 [btrfs] [ 9057.683834] ? scrub_write_block_to_dev_replace+0xb0/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 9057.684632] iterate_extent_inodes+0x1e3/0x280 [btrfs] [ 9057.685316] scrub_print_warning+0x15d/0x2f0 [btrfs] [ 9057.685977] ? ___ratelimit+0xa4/0x110 [ 9057.686460] scrub_handle_errored_block.isra.0+0x135f/0x1640 [btrfs] [ 9057.687316] scrub_bio_end_io_worker+0x101/0x2e0 [btrfs] [ 9057.688021] btrfs_work_helper+0xf8/0x400 [btrfs] [ 9057.688649] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe8/0x140 [ 9057.689180] process_one_work+0x247/0x5a0 [ 9057.689696] worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 [ 9057.690175] ? process_one_work+0x5a0/0x5a0 [ 9057.690731] kthread+0x155/0x180 [ 9057.691158] ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 [ 9057.691697] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Fix this by making btrfs_find_all_roots() never attempt to lock the commit_root_sem when it is called from btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post(). We can't just pass a non-NULL transaction handle to btrfs_find_all_roots() from btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post(), because that would make backref lookup not use commit roots and acquire read locks on extent buffers, and therefore could deadlock when btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_post() is called from the btrfs_truncate_inode_items() code path which has acquired a write lock on an extent buffer of the subvolume btree. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Add the following Telit FD980 composition 0x1056: Cfg #1: mass storage Cfg #2: rndis, tty, adb, tty, tty, tty, tty Signed-off-by: Daniele Palmas <dnlplm@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210803194711.3036-1-dnlplm@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>

commit 5648c07 upstream. Add the following Telit FD980 composition 0x1056: Cfg #1: mass storage Cfg #2: rndis, tty, adb, tty, tty, tty, tty Signed-off-by: Daniele Palmas <dnlplm@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210803194711.3036-1-dnlplm@gmail.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Hayes Wang says: ==================== r8169: adjust the setting for RTL8106e These patches are uesed to avoid the delay of link-up interrupt, when enabling ASPM for RTL8106e. The patch #1 is used to enable ASPM if it is possible. And the patch #2 is used to modify the entrance latencies of L0 and L1. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

…/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD KVM/arm64 fixes for 5.14, take #2 - Plug race between enabling MTE and creating vcpus - Fix off-by-one bug when checking whether an address range is RAM

…lock Add yet another spinlock for the TDP MMU and take it when marking indirect shadow pages unsync. When using the TDP MMU and L1 is running L2(s) with nested TDP, KVM may encounter shadow pages for the TDP entries managed by L1 (controlling L2) when handling a TDP MMU page fault. The unsync logic is not thread safe, e.g. the kvm_mmu_page fields are not atomic, and misbehaves when a shadow page is marked unsync via a TDP MMU page fault, which runs with mmu_lock held for read, not write. Lack of a critical section manifests most visibly as an underflow of unsync_children in clear_unsync_child_bit() due to unsync_children being corrupted when multiple CPUs write it without a critical section and without atomic operations. But underflow is the best case scenario. The worst case scenario is that unsync_children prematurely hits '0' and leads to guest memory corruption due to KVM neglecting to properly sync shadow pages. Use an entirely new spinlock even though piggybacking tdp_mmu_pages_lock would functionally be ok. Usurping the lock could degrade performance when building upper level page tables on different vCPUs, especially since the unsync flow could hold the lock for a comparatively long time depending on the number of indirect shadow pages and the depth of the paging tree. For simplicity, take the lock for all MMUs, even though KVM could fairly easily know that mmu_lock is held for write. If mmu_lock is held for write, there cannot be contention for the inner spinlock, and marking shadow pages unsync across multiple vCPUs will be slow enough that bouncing the kvm_arch cacheline should be in the noise. Note, even though L2 could theoretically be given access to its own EPT entries, a nested MMU must hold mmu_lock for write and thus cannot race against a TDP MMU page fault. I.e. the additional spinlock only _needs_ to be taken by the TDP MMU, as opposed to being taken by any MMU for a VM that is running with the TDP MMU enabled. Holding mmu_lock for read also prevents the indirect shadow page from being freed. But as above, keep it simple and always take the lock. Alternative #1, the TDP MMU could simply pass "false" for can_unsync and effectively disable unsync behavior for nested TDP. Write protecting leaf shadow pages is unlikely to noticeably impact traditional L1 VMMs, as such VMMs typically don't modify TDP entries, but the same may not hold true for non-standard use cases and/or VMMs that are migrating physical pages (from L1's perspective). Alternative #2, the unsync logic could be made thread safe. In theory, simply converting all relevant kvm_mmu_page fields to atomics and using atomic bitops for the bitmap would suffice. However, (a) an in-depth audit would be required, (b) the code churn would be substantial, and (c) legacy shadow paging would incur additional atomic operations in performance sensitive paths for no benefit (to legacy shadow paging). Fixes: a2855af ("KVM: x86/mmu: Allow parallel page faults for the TDP MMU") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Message-Id: <20210812181815.3378104-1-seanjc@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit c124706 ] Following test case reproduces lockdep warning. Test case: $ mkfs.btrfs -f <dev1> $ btrfstune -S 1 <dev1> $ mount <dev1> <mnt> $ btrfs device add <dev2> <mnt> -f $ umount <mnt> $ mount <dev2> <mnt> $ umount <mnt> The warning claims a possible ABBA deadlock between the threads initiated by [#1] btrfs device add and [#0] the mount. [ 540.743122] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 540.743129] 5.11.0-rc7+ #5 Not tainted [ 540.743135] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 540.743142] mount/2515 is trying to acquire lock: [ 540.743149] ffffa0c5544c2ce0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: clone_fs_devices+0x6d/0x210 [btrfs] [ 540.743458] but task is already holding lock: [ 540.743461] ffffa0c54a7932b8 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x200 [btrfs] [ 540.743541] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 540.743543] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 540.743546] -> #1 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{4:4}: [ 540.743566] down_read_nested+0x48/0x2b0 [ 540.743585] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x200 [btrfs] [ 540.743650] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x70/0x200 [btrfs] [ 540.743733] btrfs_search_slot+0x6c6/0xe00 [btrfs] [ 540.743785] btrfs_update_device+0x83/0x260 [btrfs] [ 540.743849] btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc+0x13f/0x660 [btrfs] <--- device_list_mutex [ 540.743911] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x18d/0x3f0 [btrfs] [ 540.743982] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x86/0x1260 [btrfs] [ 540.744037] btrfs_init_new_device+0x1600/0x1dd0 [btrfs] [ 540.744101] btrfs_ioctl+0x1c77/0x24c0 [btrfs] [ 540.744166] __x64_sys_ioctl+0xe4/0x140 [ 540.744170] do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x80 [ 540.744174] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 540.744180] -> #0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}: [ 540.744184] __lock_acquire+0x155f/0x2360 [ 540.744188] lock_acquire+0x10b/0x5c0 [ 540.744190] __mutex_lock+0xb1/0xf80 [ 540.744193] mutex_lock_nested+0x27/0x30 [ 540.744196] clone_fs_devices+0x6d/0x210 [btrfs] [ 540.744270] btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x3c7/0xbb0 [btrfs] [ 540.744336] open_ctree+0xf6e/0x2074 [btrfs] [ 540.744406] btrfs_mount_root.cold.72+0x16/0x127 [btrfs] [ 540.744472] legacy_get_tree+0x38/0x90 [ 540.744475] vfs_get_tree+0x30/0x140 [ 540.744478] fc_mount+0x16/0x60 [ 540.744482] vfs_kern_mount+0x91/0x100 [ 540.744484] btrfs_mount+0x1e6/0x670 [btrfs] [ 540.744536] legacy_get_tree+0x38/0x90 [ 540.744537] vfs_get_tree+0x30/0x140 [ 540.744539] path_mount+0x8d8/0x1070 [ 540.744541] do_mount+0x8d/0xc0 [ 540.744543] __x64_sys_mount+0x125/0x160 [ 540.744545] do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x80 [ 540.744547] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 540.744551] other info that might help us debug this: [ 540.744552] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 540.744553] CPU0 CPU1 [ 540.744554] ---- ---- [ 540.744555] lock(btrfs-chunk-00); [ 540.744557] lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); [ 540.744560] lock(btrfs-chunk-00); [ 540.744562] lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); [ 540.744564] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 540.744565] 3 locks held by mount/2515: [ 540.744567] #0: ffffa0c56bf7a0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#42/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: alloc_super.isra.16+0xdf/0x450 [ 540.744574] #1: ffffffffc05a9628 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x63/0xbb0 [btrfs] [ 540.744640] #2: ffffa0c54a7932b8 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x200 [btrfs] [ 540.744708] stack backtrace: [ 540.744712] CPU: 2 PID: 2515 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.11.0-rc7+ #5 But the device_list_mutex in clone_fs_devices() is redundant, as explained below. Two threads [1] and [2] (below) could lead to clone_fs_device(). [1] open_ctree <== mount sprout fs btrfs_read_chunk_tree() mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex) <== global lock read_one_dev() open_seed_devices() clone_fs_devices() <== seed fs_devices mutex_lock(&orig->device_list_mutex) <== seed fs_devices [2] btrfs_init_new_device() <== sprouting mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex); <== global lock btrfs_prepare_sprout() lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex) clone_fs_devices(seed_fs_device) <== seed fs_devices Both of these threads hold uuid_mutex which is sufficient to protect getting the seed device(s) freed while we are trying to clone it for sprouting [2] or mounting a sprout [1] (as above). A mounted seed device can not free/write/replace because it is read-only. An unmounted seed device can be freed by btrfs_free_stale_devices(), but it needs uuid_mutex. So this patch removes the unnecessary device_list_mutex in clone_fs_devices(). And adds a lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex) in clone_fs_devices(). Reported-by: Su Yue <l@damenly.su> Tested-by: Su Yue <l@damenly.su> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit dfbb340 ] If CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP && CONFIG_MTD (at least; there might be other combinations), lockdep complains circular locking dependency at __loop_clr_fd(), for major_names_lock serves as a locking dependency aggregating hub across multiple block modules. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0+ #757 Tainted: G E ------------------------------------------------------ systemd-udevd/7568 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88800f334d48 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x70/0x560 but task is already holding lock: ffff888014a7d4a0 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x4d/0x400 [loop] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #6 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 __mutex_lock_common+0xb6/0xe10 mutex_lock_killable_nested+0x17/0x20 lo_open+0x23/0x50 [loop] blkdev_get_by_dev+0x199/0x540 blkdev_open+0x58/0x90 do_dentry_open+0x144/0x3a0 path_openat+0xa57/0xda0 do_filp_open+0x9f/0x140 do_sys_openat2+0x71/0x150 __x64_sys_openat+0x78/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #5 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 __mutex_lock_common+0xb6/0xe10 mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x20 bd_register_pending_holders+0x20/0x100 device_add_disk+0x1ae/0x390 loop_add+0x29c/0x2d0 [loop] blk_request_module+0x5a/0xb0 blkdev_get_no_open+0x27/0xa0 blkdev_get_by_dev+0x5f/0x540 blkdev_open+0x58/0x90 do_dentry_open+0x144/0x3a0 path_openat+0xa57/0xda0 do_filp_open+0x9f/0x140 do_sys_openat2+0x71/0x150 __x64_sys_openat+0x78/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #4 (major_names_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 __mutex_lock_common+0xb6/0xe10 mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x20 blkdev_show+0x19/0x80 devinfo_show+0x52/0x60 seq_read_iter+0x2d5/0x3e0 proc_reg_read_iter+0x41/0x80 vfs_read+0x2ac/0x330 ksys_read+0x6b/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #3 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 __mutex_lock_common+0xb6/0xe10 mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x20 seq_read_iter+0x37/0x3e0 generic_file_splice_read+0xf3/0x170 splice_direct_to_actor+0x14e/0x350 do_splice_direct+0x84/0xd0 do_sendfile+0x263/0x430 __se_sys_sendfile64+0x96/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #2 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}: lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 lo_write_bvec+0x96/0x280 [loop] loop_process_work+0xa68/0xc10 [loop] process_one_work+0x293/0x480 worker_thread+0x23d/0x4b0 kthread+0x163/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 process_one_work+0x280/0x480 worker_thread+0x23d/0x4b0 kthread+0x163/0x180 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: validate_chain+0x1f0d/0x33e0 __lock_acquire+0x92d/0x1030 lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 flush_workqueue+0x8c/0x560 drain_workqueue+0x80/0x140 destroy_workqueue+0x47/0x4f0 __loop_clr_fd+0xb4/0x400 [loop] blkdev_put+0x14a/0x1d0 blkdev_close+0x1c/0x20 __fput+0xfd/0x220 task_work_run+0x69/0xc0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1ce/0x1f0 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x26/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock(&disk->open_mutex); lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock((wq_completion)loop0); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by systemd-udevd/7568: #0: ffff888012554128 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: blkdev_put+0x4c/0x1d0 #1: ffff888014a7d4a0 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x4d/0x400 [loop] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 7568 Comm: systemd-udevd Tainted: G E 5.14.0+ #757 Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 02/27/2020 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x79/0xbf print_circular_bug+0x5d6/0x5e0 ? stack_trace_save+0x42/0x60 ? save_trace+0x3d/0x2d0 check_noncircular+0x10b/0x120 validate_chain+0x1f0d/0x33e0 ? __lock_acquire+0x953/0x1030 ? __lock_acquire+0x953/0x1030 __lock_acquire+0x92d/0x1030 ? flush_workqueue+0x70/0x560 lock_acquire+0xbe/0x1f0 ? flush_workqueue+0x70/0x560 flush_workqueue+0x8c/0x560 ? flush_workqueue+0x70/0x560 ? sched_clock_cpu+0xe/0x1a0 ? drain_workqueue+0x41/0x140 drain_workqueue+0x80/0x140 destroy_workqueue+0x47/0x4f0 ? blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait+0xac/0xd0 __loop_clr_fd+0xb4/0x400 [loop] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x35/0x230 blkdev_put+0x14a/0x1d0 blkdev_close+0x1c/0x20 __fput+0xfd/0x220 task_work_run+0x69/0xc0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1ce/0x1f0 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x26/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f0fd4c661f7 Code: 00 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 03 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 41 c3 48 83 ec 18 89 7c 24 0c e8 13 fc ff ff RSP: 002b:00007ffd1c9e9fd8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000003 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007f0fd46be6c8 RCX: 00007f0fd4c661f7 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000006 RBP: 0000000000000006 R08: 000055fff1eaf400 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00007f0fd46be6c8 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000002f08 R15: 00007ffd1c9ea050 Commit 1c500ad ("loop: reduce the loop_ctl_mutex scope") is for breaking "loop_ctl_mutex => &lo->lo_mutex" dependency chain. But enabling a different block module results in forming circular locking dependency due to shared major_names_lock mutex. The simplest fix is to call probe function without holding major_names_lock [1], but Christoph Hellwig does not like such idea. Therefore, instead of holding major_names_lock in blkdev_show(), introduce a different lock for blkdev_show() in order to break "sb_writers#$N => &p->lock => major_names_lock" dependency chain. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/b2af8a5b-3c1b-204e-7f56-bea0b15848d6@i-love.sakura.ne.jp [1] Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/18a02da2-0bf3-550e-b071-2b4ab13c49f0@i-love.sakura.ne.jp Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

The FSM can run in a circle allowing rdma_resolve_ip() to be called twice on the same id_priv. While this cannot happen without going through the work, it violates the invariant that the same address resolution background request cannot be active twice. CPU 1 CPU 2 rdma_resolve_addr(): RDMA_CM_IDLE -> RDMA_CM_ADDR_QUERY rdma_resolve_ip(addr_handler) #1 process_one_req(): for #1 addr_handler(): RDMA_CM_ADDR_QUERY -> RDMA_CM_ADDR_BOUND mutex_unlock(&id_priv->handler_mutex); [.. handler still running ..] rdma_resolve_addr(): RDMA_CM_ADDR_BOUND -> RDMA_CM_ADDR_QUERY rdma_resolve_ip(addr_handler) !! two requests are now on the req_list rdma_destroy_id(): destroy_id_handler_unlock(): _destroy_id(): cma_cancel_operation(): rdma_addr_cancel() // process_one_req() self removes it spin_lock_bh(&lock); cancel_delayed_work(&req->work); if (!list_empty(&req->list)) == true ! rdma_addr_cancel() returns after process_on_req #1 is done kfree(id_priv) process_one_req(): for #2 addr_handler(): mutex_lock(&id_priv->handler_mutex); !! Use after free on id_priv rdma_addr_cancel() expects there to be one req on the list and only cancels the first one. The self-removal behavior of the work only happens after the handler has returned. This yields a situations where the req_list can have two reqs for the same "handle" but rdma_addr_cancel() only cancels the first one. The second req remains active beyond rdma_destroy_id() and will use-after-free id_priv once it inevitably triggers. Fix this by remembering if the id_priv has called rdma_resolve_ip() and always cancel before calling it again. This ensures the req_list never gets more than one item in it and doesn't cost anything in the normal flow that never uses this strange error path. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0-v1-3bc675b8006d+22-syz_cancel_uaf_jgg@nvidia.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: e51060f ("IB: IP address based RDMA connection manager") Reported-by: syzbot+dc3dfba010d7671e05f5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

Syzkaller reported a false positive deadlock involving the nl socket lock and the subflow socket lock: MPTCP: kernel_bind error, err=-98 ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 5.15.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- syz-executor998/6520 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880795718a0 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_close+0x267/0x7b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2738 but task is already holding lock: ffff8880787c8c60 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1612 [inline] ffff8880787c8c60 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_close+0x23/0x7b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2720 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(k-sk_lock-AF_INET); lock(k-sk_lock-AF_INET); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 3 locks held by syz-executor998/6520: #0: ffffffff8d176c50 (cb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv+0x15/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:802 #1: ffffffff8d176d08 (genl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: genl_lock net/netlink/genetlink.c:33 [inline] #1: ffffffff8d176d08 (genl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv_msg+0x3e0/0x580 net/netlink/genetlink.c:790 #2: ffff8880787c8c60 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1612 [inline] #2: ffff8880787c8c60 (k-sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: mptcp_close+0x23/0x7b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2720 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 6520 Comm: syz-executor998 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106 print_deadlock_bug kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2944 [inline] check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2987 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3776 [inline] __lock_acquire.cold+0x149/0x3ab kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5625 [inline] lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5590 lock_sock_fast+0x36/0x100 net/core/sock.c:3229 mptcp_close+0x267/0x7b0 net/mptcp/protocol.c:2738 inet_release+0x12e/0x280 net/ipv4/af_inet.c:431 __sock_release net/socket.c:649 [inline] sock_release+0x87/0x1b0 net/socket.c:677 mptcp_pm_nl_create_listen_socket+0x238/0x2c0 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:900 mptcp_nl_cmd_add_addr+0x359/0x930 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c:1170 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x228/0x320 net/netlink/genetlink.c:731 genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:775 [inline] genl_rcv_msg+0x328/0x580 net/netlink/genetlink.c:792 netlink_rcv_skb+0x153/0x420 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2504 genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:803 netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1314 [inline] netlink_unicast+0x533/0x7d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1340 netlink_sendmsg+0x86d/0xdb0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1929 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:704 [inline] sock_sendmsg+0xcf/0x120 net/socket.c:724 sock_no_sendpage+0x101/0x150 net/core/sock.c:2980 kernel_sendpage.part.0+0x1a0/0x340 net/socket.c:3504 kernel_sendpage net/socket.c:3501 [inline] sock_sendpage+0xe5/0x140 net/socket.c:1003 pipe_to_sendpage+0x2ad/0x380 fs/splice.c:364 splice_from_pipe_feed fs/splice.c:418 [inline] __splice_from_pipe+0x43e/0x8a0 fs/splice.c:562 splice_from_pipe fs/splice.c:597 [inline] generic_splice_sendpage+0xd4/0x140 fs/splice.c:746 do_splice_from fs/splice.c:767 [inline] direct_splice_actor+0x110/0x180 fs/splice.c:936 splice_direct_to_actor+0x34b/0x8c0 fs/splice.c:891 do_splice_direct+0x1b3/0x280 fs/splice.c:979 do_sendfile+0xae9/0x1240 fs/read_write.c:1249 __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1314 [inline] __se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1300 [inline] __x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1cc/0x210 fs/read_write.c:1300 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f215cb69969 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 14 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 c0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffc96bb3868 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000028 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f215cbad072 RCX: 00007f215cb69969 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007ffc96bb3a08 R09: 00007ffc96bb3a08 R10: 0000000100000002 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffc96bb387c R13: 431bde82d7b634db R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 the problem originates from uncorrect lock annotation in the mptcp code and is only visible since commit 2dcb96b ("net: core: Correct the sock::sk_lock.owned lockdep annotations"), but is present since the port-based endpoint support initial implementation. This patch addresses the issue introducing a nested variant of lock_sock_fast() and using it in the relevant code path. Fixes: 1729cf1 ("mptcp: create the listening socket for new port") Fixes: 2dcb96b ("net: core: Correct the sock::sk_lock.owned lockdep annotations") Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+1dd53f7a89b299d59eaf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Patch that refactored fl_walk() to use idr_for_each_entry_continue_ul() also removed rcu protection of individual filters which causes following use-after-free when filter is deleted concurrently. Fix fl_walk() to obtain rcu read lock while iterating and taking the filter reference and temporary release the lock while calling arg->fn() callback that can sleep. KASAN trace: [ 352.773640] ================================================================== [ 352.775041] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in fl_walk+0x159/0x240 [cls_flower] [ 352.776304] Read of size 4 at addr ffff8881c8251480 by task tc/2987 [ 352.777862] CPU: 3 PID: 2987 Comm: tc Not tainted 5.15.0-rc2+ #2 [ 352.778980] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 352.781022] Call Trace: [ 352.781573] dump_stack_lvl+0x46/0x5a [ 352.782332] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1f/0x140 [ 352.783400] ? fl_walk+0x159/0x240 [cls_flower] [ 352.784292] ? fl_walk+0x159/0x240 [cls_flower] [ 352.785138] kasan_report.cold+0x83/0xdf [ 352.785851] ? fl_walk+0x159/0x240 [cls_flower] [ 352.786587] kasan_check_range+0x145/0x1a0 [ 352.787337] fl_walk+0x159/0x240 [cls_flower] [ 352.788163] ? fl_put+0x10/0x10 [cls_flower] [ 352.789007] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath.constprop.0+0x220/0x220 [ 352.790102] tcf_chain_dump+0x231/0x450 [ 352.790878] ? tcf_chain_tp_delete_empty+0x170/0x170 [ 352.791833] ? __might_sleep+0x2e/0xc0 [ 352.792594] ? tfilter_notify+0x170/0x170 [ 352.793400] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath.constprop.0+0x220/0x220 [ 352.794477] tc_dump_tfilter+0x385/0x4b0 [ 352.795262] ? tc_new_tfilter+0x1180/0x1180 [ 352.796103] ? __mod_node_page_state+0x1f/0xc0 [ 352.796974] ? __build_skb_around+0x10e/0x130 [ 352.797826] netlink_dump+0x2c0/0x560 [ 352.798563] ? netlink_getsockopt+0x430/0x430 [ 352.799433] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath.constprop.0+0x220/0x220 [ 352.800542] __netlink_dump_start+0x356/0x440 [ 352.801397] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x3ff/0x550 [ 352.802190] ? tc_new_tfilter+0x1180/0x1180 [ 352.802872] ? rtnl_calcit.isra.0+0x1f0/0x1f0 [ 352.803668] ? tc_new_tfilter+0x1180/0x1180 [ 352.804344] ? _copy_from_iter_nocache+0x800/0x800 [ 352.805202] ? kasan_set_track+0x1c/0x30 [ 352.805900] netlink_rcv_skb+0xc6/0x1f0 [ 352.806587] ? rht_deferred_worker+0x6b0/0x6b0 [ 352.807455] ? rtnl_calcit.isra.0+0x1f0/0x1f0 [ 352.808324] ? netlink_ack+0x4d0/0x4d0 [ 352.809086] ? netlink_deliver_tap+0x62/0x3d0 [ 352.809951] netlink_unicast+0x353/0x480 [ 352.810744] ? netlink_attachskb+0x430/0x430 [ 352.811586] ? __alloc_skb+0xd7/0x200 [ 352.812349] netlink_sendmsg+0x396/0x680 [ 352.813132] ? netlink_unicast+0x480/0x480 [ 352.813952] ? __import_iovec+0x192/0x210 [ 352.814759] ? netlink_unicast+0x480/0x480 [ 352.815580] sock_sendmsg+0x6c/0x80 [ 352.816299] ____sys_sendmsg+0x3a5/0x3c0 [ 352.817096] ? kernel_sendmsg+0x30/0x30 [ 352.817873] ? __ia32_sys_recvmmsg+0x150/0x150 [ 352.818753] ___sys_sendmsg+0xd8/0x140 [ 352.819518] ? sendmsg_copy_msghdr+0x110/0x110 [ 352.820402] ? ___sys_recvmsg+0xf4/0x1a0 [ 352.821110] ? __copy_msghdr_from_user+0x260/0x260 [ 352.821934] ? _raw_spin_lock+0x81/0xd0 [ 352.822680] ? __handle_mm_fault+0xef3/0x1b20 [ 352.823549] ? rb_insert_color+0x2a/0x270 [ 352.824373] ? copy_page_range+0x16b0/0x16b0 [ 352.825209] ? perf_event_update_userpage+0x2d0/0x2d0 [ 352.826190] ? __fget_light+0xd9/0xf0 [ 352.826941] __sys_sendmsg+0xb3/0x130 [ 352.827613] ? __sys_sendmsg_sock+0x20/0x20 [ 352.828377] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x2c5/0x8a0 [ 352.829184] ? fpregs_assert_state_consistent+0x52/0x60 [ 352.830001] ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x32/0x160 [ 352.830845] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 [ 352.831445] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 352.832331] RIP: 0033:0x7f7bee973c17 [ 352.833078] Code: 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 2e 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 89 54 24 1c 48 89 74 24 10 [ 352.836202] RSP: 002b:00007ffcbb368e28 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002e [ 352.837524] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f7bee973c17 [ 352.838715] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00007ffcbb368e50 RDI: 0000000000000003 [ 352.839838] RBP: 00007ffcbb36d090 R08: 00000000cea96d79 R09: 00007f7beea34a40 [ 352.841021] R10: 00000000004059bb R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000046563f [ 352.842208] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00007ffcbb36d088 [ 352.843784] Allocated by task 2960: [ 352.844451] kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40 [ 352.845173] __kasan_kmalloc+0x7c/0x90 [ 352.845873] fl_change+0x282/0x22db [cls_flower] [ 352.846696] tc_new_tfilter+0x6cf/0x1180 [ 352.847493] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x471/0x550 [ 352.848323] netlink_rcv_skb+0xc6/0x1f0 [ 352.849097] netlink_unicast+0x353/0x480 [ 352.849886] netlink_sendmsg+0x396/0x680 [ 352.850678] sock_sendmsg+0x6c/0x80 [ 352.851398] ____sys_sendmsg+0x3a5/0x3c0 [ 352.852202] ___sys_sendmsg+0xd8/0x140 [ 352.852967] __sys_sendmsg+0xb3/0x130 [ 352.853718] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 [ 352.854457] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 352.855830] Freed by task 7: [ 352.856421] kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40 [ 352.857139] kasan_set_track+0x1c/0x30 [ 352.857854] kasan_set_free_info+0x20/0x30 [ 352.858609] __kasan_slab_free+0xed/0x130 [ 352.859348] kfree+0xa7/0x3c0 [ 352.859951] process_one_work+0x44d/0x780 [ 352.860685] worker_thread+0x2e2/0x7e0 [ 352.861390] kthread+0x1f4/0x220 [ 352.862022] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [ 352.862955] Last potentially related work creation: [ 352.863758] kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40 [ 352.864378] kasan_record_aux_stack+0xab/0xc0 [ 352.865028] insert_work+0x30/0x160 [ 352.865617] __queue_work+0x351/0x670 [ 352.866261] rcu_work_rcufn+0x30/0x40 [ 352.866917] rcu_core+0x3b2/0xdb0 [ 352.867561] __do_softirq+0xf6/0x386 [ 352.868708] Second to last potentially related work creation: [ 352.869779] kasan_save_stack+0x1b/0x40 [ 352.870560] kasan_record_aux_stack+0xab/0xc0 [ 352.871426] call_rcu+0x5f/0x5c0 [ 352.872108] queue_rcu_work+0x44/0x50 [ 352.872855] __fl_put+0x17c/0x240 [cls_flower] [ 352.873733] fl_delete+0xc7/0x100 [cls_flower] [ 352.874607] tc_del_tfilter+0x510/0xb30 [ 352.886085] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x471/0x550 [ 352.886875] netlink_rcv_skb+0xc6/0x1f0 [ 352.887636] netlink_unicast+0x353/0x480 [ 352.888285] netlink_sendmsg+0x396/0x680 [ 352.888942] sock_sendmsg+0x6c/0x80 [ 352.889583] ____sys_sendmsg+0x3a5/0x3c0 [ 352.890311] ___sys_sendmsg+0xd8/0x140 [ 352.891019] __sys_sendmsg+0xb3/0x130 [ 352.891716] do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80 [ 352.892395] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 352.893666] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff8881c8251000 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-2k of size 2048 [ 352.895696] The buggy address is located 1152 bytes inside of 2048-byte region [ffff8881c8251000, ffff8881c8251800) [ 352.897640] The buggy address belongs to the page: [ 352.898492] page:00000000213bac35 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x1c8250 [ 352.900110] head:00000000213bac35 order:3 compound_mapcount:0 compound_pincount:0 [ 352.901541] flags: 0x2ffff800010200(slab|head|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1ffff) [ 352.902908] raw: 002ffff800010200 0000000000000000 dead000000000122 ffff888100042f00 [ 352.904391] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000080008 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000 [ 352.905861] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected [ 352.907323] Memory state around the buggy address: [ 352.908218] ffff8881c8251380: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [ 352.909471] ffff8881c8251400: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [ 352.910735] >ffff8881c8251480: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [ 352.912012] ^ [ 352.912642] ffff8881c8251500: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [ 352.913919] ffff8881c8251580: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [ 352.915185] ================================================================== Fixes: d39d714 ("idr: introduce idr_for_each_entry_continue_ul()") Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Pablo Neira Ayuso says: ==================== Netfilter fixes for net (v2) The following patchset contains Netfilter fixes for net: 1) Move back the defrag users fields to the global netns_nf area. Kernel fails to boot if conntrack is builtin and kernel is booted with: nf_conntrack.enable_hooks=1. From Florian Westphal. 2) Rule event notification is missing relevant context such as the position handle and the NLM_F_APPEND flag. 3) Rule replacement is expanded to add + delete using the existing rule handle, reverse order of this operation so it makes sense from rule notification standpoint. 4) Propagate to userspace the NLM_F_CREATE and NLM_F_EXCL flags from the rule notification path. Patches #2, #3 and #4 are used by 'nft monitor' and 'iptables-monitor' userspace utilities which are not correctly representing the following operations through netlink notifications: - rule insertions - rule addition/insertion from position handle - create table/chain/set/map/flowtable/... ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Fix afs_launder_page() to set the starting position of the StoreData RPC at the offset into the page at which the modified data starts instead of at the beginning of the page (the iov_iter is correctly offset). The offset got lost during the conversion to passing an iov_iter into afs_store_data(). Changes: ver #2: - Use page_offset() rather than manually calculating it[1]. Fixes: bd80d8a ("afs: Use ITER_XARRAY for writing") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com> cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YST/0e92OdSH0zjg@casper.infradead.org/ [1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162880783179.3421678.7795105718190440134.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162937512409.1449272.18441473411207824084.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162981148752.1901565.3663780601682206026.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163005741670.2472992.2073548908229887941.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v2 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163221839087.3143591.14278359695763025231.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v2 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163292980654.4004896.7134735179887998551.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v2

…ernel/git/at91/linux into arm/fixes AT91 fixes #2 for 5.15: - More fixes for AT91 platform power management code related to the introduction of sama7g5: - management of DDR3L regulator rails for sama7g5ek - loading of TLB on different cores - PIO controller slew-rate settings for sama7g5ek: be aligned with datasheet requirements. * tag 'at91-fixes-5.15-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/at91/linux: ARM: dts: at91: sama7g5ek: to not touch slew-rate for SDMMC pins ARM: dts: at91: sama7g5ek: use proper slew-rate settings for GMACs ARM: at91: pm: preload base address of controllers in tlb ARM: at91: pm: group constants and addresses loading ARM: dts: at91: sama7g5ek: add suspend voltage for ddr3l rail Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211004114344.19304-1-nicolas.ferre@microchip.com Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

If the device file was opened prior to fw being available (such as from initrd before rootfs is mounted, when the initrd does not contain GPU fw), that would cause a later crash when the dev file is closed due to unitialized submitqueues list: CPU: 4 PID: 263 Comm: plymouthd Tainted: G W 5.15.0-rc2-next-20210924 #2 Hardware name: LENOVO 81JL/LNVNB161216, BIOS 9UCN33WW(V2.06) 06/ 4/2019 pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : msm_submitqueue_close+0x30/0x190 [msm] lr : msm_postclose+0x54/0xf0 [msm] sp : ffff80001074bb80 x29: ffff80001074bb80 x28: ffff03ad80c4db80 x27: ffff03ad80dc5ab0 x26: 0000000000000000 x25: ffff03ad80dc5af8 x24: ffff03ad81e90800 x23: 0000000000000000 x22: ffff03ad81e90800 x21: ffff03ad8b35e788 x20: ffff03ad81e90878 x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffffda15f14f7940 x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000 x13: 0000000000000001 x12: 0000000000000040 x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000 x9 : ffffda15cd18ff88 x8 : ffff03ad80c4db80 x7 : 0000000000000228 x6 : 0000000000000000 x5 : 1793a4e807e636bd x4 : ffff03ad80c4db80 x3 : ffff03ad81e90878 x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff03ad80c4db80 x0 : 0000000000000000 Call trace: msm_submitqueue_close+0x30/0x190 [msm] msm_postclose+0x54/0xf0 [msm] drm_file_free.part.0+0x1cc/0x2e0 [drm] drm_close_helper.isra.0+0x74/0x84 [drm] drm_release+0x78/0x120 [drm] __fput+0x78/0x23c ____fput+0x1c/0x30 task_work_run+0xcc/0x22c do_exit+0x304/0x9f4 do_group_exit+0x44/0xb0 __wake_up_parent+0x0/0x3c invoke_syscall+0x50/0x120 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x4c/0xf4 do_el0_svc+0x30/0x9c el0_svc+0x20/0x60 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xe8/0xf0 el0t_64_sync+0x1a0/0x1a4 Code: aa0003f5 a90153f3 f8408eb3 aa1303e0 (f85e8674) ---[ end trace 39b2fa37509a2be2 ]--- Fixing recursive fault but reboot is needed! Fixes: 86c2a0f drm/msm: ("Small submitqueue creation cleanup") Reported-by: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@kali.org> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>

@jakub

Justin Iurman says: ==================== Correct the IOAM behavior for undefined trace type bits (@jakub @david: there will be a conflict for #2 when merging net->net-next, due to commit [1]. The conflict is only 5-10 lines for #2 (#1 should be fine) inside the file tools/testing/selftests/net/ioam6.sh, so quite short though possibly ugly. Sorry for that, I didn't expect to post this one... Had I known, I'd have made the opposite.) Modify both the input and output behaviors regarding the trace type when one of the undefined bits is set. The goal is to keep the interoperability when new fields (aka new bits inside the range 12-21) will be defined. The draft [2] says the following: --------------------------------------------------------------- "Bit 12-21 Undefined. These values are available for future assignment in the IOAM Trace-Type Registry (Section 8.2). Every future node data field corresponding to one of these bits MUST be 4-octets long. An IOAM encapsulating node MUST set the value of each undefined bit to 0. If an IOAM transit node receives a packet with one or more of these bits set to 1, it MUST either: 1. Add corresponding node data filled with the reserved value 0xFFFFFFFF, after the node data fields for the IOAM-Trace-Type bits defined above, such that the total node data added by this node in units of 4-octets is equal to NodeLen, or 2. Not add any node data fields to the packet, even for the IOAM-Trace-Type bits defined above." --------------------------------------------------------------- The output behavior has been modified to respect the fact that "an IOAM encap node MUST set the value of each undefined bit to 0" (i.e., undefined bits can't be set anymore). As for the input behavior, current implementation is based on the second choice (i.e., "not add any data fields to the packet [...]"). With this solution, any interoperability is lost (i.e., if a new bit is defined, then an "old" kernel implementation wouldn't fill IOAM data when such new bit is set inside the trace type). The input behavior is therefore relaxed and these undefined bits are now allowed to be set. It is only possible thanks to the sentence "every future node data field corresponding to one of these bits MUST be 4-octets long". Indeed, the default empty value (the one for 4-octet fields) is inserted whenever an undefined bit is set. [1] cfbe9b0 [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data#section-5.4.1 ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

…/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD KVM/arm64 fixes for 5.15, take #2 - Properly refcount pages used as a concatenated stage-2 PGD - Fix missing unlock when detecting the use of MTE+VM_SHARED

On the preemption path when updating a Xen guest's runstate times, this lock is taken inside the scheduler rq->lock, which is a raw spinlock. This was shown in a lockdep warning: [ 89.138354] ============================= [ 89.138356] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 89.138358] 5.15.0-rc5+ #834 Tainted: G S I E [ 89.138360] ----------------------------- [ 89.138361] xen_shinfo_test/2575 is trying to lock: [ 89.138363] ffffa34a0364efd8 (&kvm->arch.pvclock_gtod_sync_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: get_kvmclock_ns+0x1f/0x130 [kvm] [ 89.138442] other info that might help us debug this: [ 89.138444] context-{5:5} [ 89.138445] 4 locks held by xen_shinfo_test/2575: [ 89.138447] #0: ffff972bdc3b8108 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x77/0x6f0 [kvm] [ 89.138483] #1: ffffa34a03662e90 (&kvm->srcu){....}-{0:0}, at: kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xdc/0x8b0 [kvm] [ 89.138526] #2: ffff97331fdbac98 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __schedule+0xff/0xbd0 [ 89.138534] #3: ffffa34a03662e90 (&kvm->srcu){....}-{0:0}, at: kvm_arch_vcpu_put+0x26/0x170 [kvm] ... [ 89.138695] get_kvmclock_ns+0x1f/0x130 [kvm] [ 89.138734] kvm_xen_update_runstate+0x14/0x90 [kvm] [ 89.138783] kvm_xen_update_runstate_guest+0x15/0xd0 [kvm] [ 89.138830] kvm_arch_vcpu_put+0xe6/0x170 [kvm] [ 89.138870] kvm_sched_out+0x2f/0x40 [kvm] [ 89.138900] __schedule+0x5de/0xbd0 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: syzbot+b282b65c2c68492df769@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 30b5c85 ("KVM: x86/xen: Add support for vCPU runstate information") Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk> Message-Id: <1b02a06421c17993df337493a68ba923f3bd5c0f.camel@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

[ Upstream commit 8ef9dc0 ] We got the following lockdep splat while running fstests (specifically btrfs/003 and btrfs/020 in a row) with the new rc. This was uncovered by 87579e9 ("loop: use worker per cgroup instead of kworker") which converted loop to using workqueues, which comes with lockdep annotations that don't exist with kworkers. The lockdep splat is as follows: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc2-custom+ #34 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ losetup/156417 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9c7645b02d38 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600 but task is already holding lock: ffff9c7647395468 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x650 [loop] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #5 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0 lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] blkdev_get_whole+0x28/0xf0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x163/0x3a0 path_openat+0x74d/0xa40 do_filp_open+0x9c/0x140 do_sys_openat2+0xb1/0x170 __x64_sys_openat+0x54/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #4 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xd1/0x3c0 blkdev_get_by_path+0xc0/0xd0 btrfs_scan_one_device+0x52/0x1f0 [btrfs] btrfs_control_ioctl+0xac/0x170 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #3 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0 btrfs_rm_device+0x48/0x6a0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x2d1c/0x3110 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #2 (sb_writers#11){.+.+}-{0:0}: lo_write_bvec+0x112/0x290 [loop] loop_process_work+0x25f/0xcb0 [loop] process_one_work+0x28f/0x5d0 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: process_one_work+0x266/0x5d0 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1130/0x1dc0 lock_acquire+0xf5/0x320 flush_workqueue+0xae/0x600 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x650 [loop] lo_ioctl+0x29d/0x780 [loop] block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock(&disk->open_mutex); lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock((wq_completion)loop0); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by losetup/156417: #0: ffff9c7647395468 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x650 [loop] stack backtrace: CPU: 8 PID: 156417 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2-custom+ #34 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 check_noncircular+0x10a/0x120 __lock_acquire+0x1130/0x1dc0 lock_acquire+0xf5/0x320 ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600 flush_workqueue+0xae/0x600 ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x650 [loop] lo_ioctl+0x29d/0x780 [loop] ? __lock_acquire+0x3a0/0x1dc0 ? update_dl_rq_load_avg+0x152/0x360 ? lock_is_held_type+0xa5/0x120 ? find_held_lock.constprop.0+0x2b/0x80 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f645884de6b Usually the uuid_mutex exists to protect the fs_devices that map together all of the devices that match a specific uuid. In rm_device we're messing with the uuid of a device, so it makes sense to protect that here. However in doing that it pulls in a whole host of lockdep dependencies, as we call mnt_may_write() on the sb before we grab the uuid_mutex, thus we end up with the dependency chain under the uuid_mutex being added under the normal sb write dependency chain, which causes problems with loop devices. We don't need the uuid mutex here however. If we call btrfs_scan_one_device() before we scratch the super block we will find the fs_devices and not find the device itself and return EBUSY because the fs_devices is open. If we call it after the scratch happens it will not appear to be a valid btrfs file system. We do not need to worry about other fs_devices modifying operations here because we're protected by the exclusive operations locking. So drop the uuid_mutex here in order to fix the lockdep splat. A more detailed explanation from the discussion: We are worried about rm and scan racing with each other, before this change we'll zero the device out under the UUID mutex so when scan does run it'll make sure that it can go through the whole device scan thing without rm messing with us. We aren't worried if the scratch happens first, because the result is we don't think this is a btrfs device and we bail out. The only case we are concerned with is we scratch _after_ scan is able to read the superblock and gets a seemingly valid super block, so lets consider this case. Scan will call device_list_add() with the device we're removing. We'll call find_fsid_with_metadata_uuid() and get our fs_devices for this UUID. At this point we lock the fs_devices->device_list_mutex. This is what protects us in this case, but we have two cases here. 1. We aren't to the device removal part of the RM. We found our device, and device name matches our path, we go down and we set total_devices to our super number of devices, which doesn't affect anything because we haven't done the remove yet. 2. We are past the device removal part, which is protected by the device_list_mutex. Scan doesn't find the device, it goes down and does the if (fs_devices->opened) return -EBUSY; check and we bail out. Nothing about this situation is ideal, but the lockdep splat is real, and the fix is safe, tho admittedly a bit scary looking. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ copy more from the discussion ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

…eam state [ Upstream commit b7b1d02 ] The internal stream state sets the timeout to 120 seconds 2 seconds after the creation of the flow, attach this internal stream state to the IPS_ASSURED flag for consistent event reporting. Before this patch: [NEW] udp 17 30 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 [UNREPLIED] src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282 [UPDATE] udp 17 30 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282 [UPDATE] udp 17 30 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282 [ASSURED] [DESTROY] udp 17 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282 [ASSURED] Note IPS_ASSURED for the flow not yet in the internal stream state. after this update: [NEW] udp 17 30 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 [UNREPLIED] src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282 [UPDATE] udp 17 30 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282 [UPDATE] udp 17 120 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282 [ASSURED] [DESTROY] udp 17 src=10.246.11.13 dst=216.239.35.0 sport=37282 dport=123 src=216.239.35.0 dst=10.246.11.13 sport=123 dport=37282 [ASSURED] Before this patch, short-lived UDP flows never entered IPS_ASSURED, so they were already candidate flow to be deleted by early_drop under stress. Before this patch, IPS_ASSURED is set on regardless the internal stream state, attach this internal stream state to IPS_ASSURED. packet #1 (original direction) enters NEW state packet #2 (reply direction) enters ESTABLISHED state, sets on IPS_SEEN_REPLY paclet #3 (any direction) sets on IPS_ASSURED (if 2 seconds since the creation has passed by). Reported-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykowski@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit 64ea2d0 ] The change of devlink_alloc() to accept device makes sure that device is fully initialized and device_register() does nothing except allowing users to use that devlink instance. Such change ensures that no user input will be usable till that point and it eliminates the need to worry about internal locking as long as devlink_register is called last since all accesses to the devlink are during initialization. This change fixes the following lockdep warning. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc2+ #27 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ devlink/265 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880133c2bc0 (&dev->intf_state_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5_unload_one+0x1e/0xa0 [mlx5_core] but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8362b468 (devlink_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: devlink_nl_pre_doit+0x2b/0x8d0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (devlink_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x149/0x1310 devlink_register+0xe7/0x280 mlx5_devlink_register+0x118/0x480 [mlx5_core] mlx5_init_one+0x34b/0x440 [mlx5_core] probe_one+0x480/0x6e0 [mlx5_core] pci_device_probe+0x2a0/0x4a0 really_probe+0x1cb/0xba0 __driver_probe_device+0x18f/0x470 driver_probe_device+0x49/0x120 __driver_attach+0x1ce/0x400 bus_for_each_dev+0x11e/0x1a0 bus_add_driver+0x309/0x570 driver_register+0x20f/0x390 0xffffffffa04a0062 do_one_initcall+0xd5/0x400 do_init_module+0x1c8/0x760 load_module+0x7d9d/0xa4b0 __do_sys_finit_module+0x118/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #0 (&dev->intf_state_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x2999/0x5a40 lock_acquire+0x1a9/0x4a0 __mutex_lock+0x149/0x1310 mlx5_unload_one+0x1e/0xa0 [mlx5_core] mlx5_devlink_reload_down+0x185/0x2b0 [mlx5_core] devlink_reload+0x1f2/0x640 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6c3/0x10d0 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x1e9/0x2f0 genl_rcv_msg+0x27f/0x4a0 netlink_rcv_skb+0x11e/0x340 genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 netlink_unicast+0x433/0x700 netlink_sendmsg+0x6fb/0xbe0 sock_sendmsg+0xb0/0xe0 __sys_sendto+0x192/0x240 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(devlink_mutex); lock(&dev->intf_state_mutex); lock(devlink_mutex); lock(&dev->intf_state_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by devlink/265: #0: ffffffff836371d0 (cb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv+0x15/0x40 #1: ffffffff83637288 (genl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv_msg+0x31a/0x4a0 #2: ffffffff8362b468 (devlink_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: devlink_nl_pre_doit+0x2b/0x8d0 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 265 Comm: devlink Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ #27 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x45/0x59 check_noncircular+0x268/0x310 ? print_circular_bug+0x460/0x460 ? __kernel_text_address+0xe/0x30 ? alloc_chain_hlocks+0x1e6/0x5a0 __lock_acquire+0x2999/0x5a40 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x3e0/0x3e0 ? add_lock_to_list.constprop.0+0x6c/0x530 lock_acquire+0x1a9/0x4a0 ? mlx5_unload_one+0x1e/0xa0 [mlx5_core] ? lock_release+0x6c0/0x6c0 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x3e0/0x3e0 ? lock_is_held_type+0x98/0x110 __mutex_lock+0x149/0x1310 ? mlx5_unload_one+0x1e/0xa0 [mlx5_core] ? lock_is_held_type+0x98/0x110 ? mlx5_unload_one+0x1e/0xa0 [mlx5_core] ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x110 ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0x1160/0x1160 ? mlx5_lag_is_active+0x72/0x90 [mlx5_core] ? lock_downgrade+0x6d0/0x6d0 ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x12e/0x270 ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90 ? mlx5_unload_one+0x1e/0xa0 [mlx5_core] mlx5_unload_one+0x1e/0xa0 [mlx5_core] mlx5_devlink_reload_down+0x185/0x2b0 [mlx5_core] ? netlink_broadcast_filtered+0x308/0xac0 ? mlx5_devlink_info_get+0x1f0/0x1f0 [mlx5_core] ? __build_skb_around+0x110/0x2b0 ? __alloc_skb+0x113/0x2b0 devlink_reload+0x1f2/0x640 ? devlink_unregister+0x1e0/0x1e0 ? security_capable+0x51/0x90 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6c3/0x10d0 ? devlink_nl_cmd_get_doit+0x1e0/0x1e0 ? devlink_nl_pre_doit+0x72/0x8d0 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x1e9/0x2f0 ? __lock_acquire+0x15e2/0x5a40 ? genl_family_rcv_msg_attrs_parse.constprop.0+0x240/0x240 ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0x1160/0x1160 ? security_capable+0x51/0x90 genl_rcv_msg+0x27f/0x4a0 ? genl_get_cmd+0x3c0/0x3c0 ? lock_acquire+0x1a9/0x4a0 ? devlink_nl_cmd_get_doit+0x1e0/0x1e0 ? lock_release+0x6c0/0x6c0 netlink_rcv_skb+0x11e/0x340 ? genl_get_cmd+0x3c0/0x3c0 ? netlink_ack+0x930/0x930 genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 netlink_unicast+0x433/0x700 ? netlink_attachskb+0x750/0x750 ? __alloc_skb+0x113/0x2b0 netlink_sendmsg+0x6fb/0xbe0 ? netlink_unicast+0x700/0x700 ? netlink_unicast+0x700/0x700 sock_sendmsg+0xb0/0xe0 __sys_sendto+0x192/0x240 ? __x64_sys_getpeername+0xb0/0xb0 ? do_sys_openat2+0x10a/0x370 ? down_write_nested+0x150/0x150 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x215/0xd50 ? __x64_sys_openat+0x11f/0x1d0 ? __x64_sys_open+0x1a0/0x1a0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x1d/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f50b50b6b3a Code: d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b8 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 41 89 ca 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 15 b8 2c 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 76 c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 83 ec 30 44 89 4c RSP: 002b:00007fff6c0d3f38 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000005 RCX: 00007f50b50b6b3a RDX: 0000000000000038 RSI: 000055763ac08440 RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 000055763ac08410 R08: 00007f50b5192200 R09: 000000000000000c R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000055763ac08410 R15: 000055763ac08440 mlx5_core 0000:00:09.0: firmware version: 4.8.9999 mlx5_core 0000:00:09.0: 0.000 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth (8.0 GT/s PCIe x255 link) mlx5_core 0000:00:09.0 eth1: Link up Fixes: a6f3b62 ("net/mlx5: Move devlink registration before interfaces load") Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

commit 2aa3660 upstream. It is generally unsafe to call put_device() with dpm_list_mtx held, because the given device's release routine may carry out an action depending on that lock which then may deadlock, so modify the system-wide suspend and resume of devices to always drop dpm_list_mtx before calling put_device() (and adjust white space somewhat while at it). For instance, this prevents the following splat from showing up in the kernel log after a system resume in certain configurations: [ 3290.969514] ====================================================== [ 3290.969517] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 3290.969519] 5.15.0+ #2420 Tainted: G S [ 3290.969523] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 3290.969525] systemd-sleep/4553 is trying to acquire lock: [ 3290.969529] ffff888117ab1138 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x87/0x4a0 [ 3290.969554] but task is already holding lock: [ 3290.969556] ffffffff8280fca8 (dpm_list_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dpm_resume+0x12e/0x3e0 [ 3290.969571] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 3290.969573] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 3290.969575] -> #3 (dpm_list_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3290.969583] __mutex_lock+0x9d/0xa30 [ 3290.969591] device_pm_add+0x2e/0xe0 [ 3290.969597] device_add+0x4d5/0x8f0 [ 3290.969605] hci_conn_add_sysfs+0x43/0xb0 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969689] hci_conn_complete_evt.isra.71+0x124/0x750 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969747] hci_event_packet+0xd6c/0x28a0 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969798] hci_rx_work+0x213/0x640 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969842] process_one_work+0x2aa/0x650 [ 3290.969851] worker_thread+0x39/0x400 [ 3290.969859] kthread+0x142/0x170 [ 3290.969865] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 3290.969872] -> #2 (&hdev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3290.969881] __mutex_lock+0x9d/0xa30 [ 3290.969887] hci_event_packet+0xba/0x28a0 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969935] hci_rx_work+0x213/0x640 [bluetooth] [ 3290.969978] process_one_work+0x2aa/0x650 [ 3290.969985] worker_thread+0x39/0x400 [ 3290.969993] kthread+0x142/0x170 [ 3290.969999] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 3290.970004] -> #1 ((work_completion)(&hdev->rx_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 3290.970013] process_one_work+0x27d/0x650 [ 3290.970020] worker_thread+0x39/0x400 [ 3290.970028] kthread+0x142/0x170 [ 3290.970033] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 3290.970038] -> #0 ((wq_completion)hci0#2){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 3290.970047] __lock_acquire+0x15cb/0x1b50 [ 3290.970054] lock_acquire+0x26c/0x300 [ 3290.970059] flush_workqueue+0xae/0x4a0 [ 3290.970066] drain_workqueue+0xa1/0x130 [ 3290.970073] destroy_workqueue+0x34/0x1f0 [ 3290.970081] hci_release_dev+0x49/0x180 [bluetooth] [ 3290.970130] bt_host_release+0x1d/0x30 [bluetooth] [ 3290.970195] device_release+0x33/0x90 [ 3290.970201] kobject_release+0x63/0x160 [ 3290.970211] dpm_resume+0x164/0x3e0 [ 3290.970215] dpm_resume_end+0xd/0x20 [ 3290.970220] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x1a4/0xba0 [ 3290.970229] pm_suspend+0x26b/0x310 [ 3290.970236] state_store+0x42/0x90 [ 3290.970243] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x135/0x1b0 [ 3290.970251] new_sync_write+0x125/0x1c0 [ 3290.970257] vfs_write+0x360/0x3c0 [ 3290.970263] ksys_write+0xa7/0xe0 [ 3290.970269] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [ 3290.970276] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3290.970284] other info that might help us debug this: [ 3290.970285] Chain exists of: (wq_completion)hci0#2 --> &hdev->lock --> dpm_list_mtx [ 3290.970297] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 3290.970299] CPU0 CPU1 [ 3290.970300] ---- ---- [ 3290.970302] lock(dpm_list_mtx); [ 3290.970306] lock(&hdev->lock); [ 3290.970310] lock(dpm_list_mtx); [ 3290.970314] lock((wq_completion)hci0#2); [ 3290.970319] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 3290.970321] 7 locks held by systemd-sleep/4553: [ 3290.970325] #0: ffff888103bcd448 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0xa7/0xe0 [ 3290.970341] #1: ffff888115a14488 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x103/0x1b0 [ 3290.970355] #2: ffff888100f719e0 (kn->active#233){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x10c/0x1b0 [ 3290.970369] #3: ffffffff82661048 (autosleep_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: state_store+0x12/0x90 [ 3290.970384] #4: ffffffff82658ac8 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pm_suspend+0x9f/0x310 [ 3290.970399] #5: ffffffff827f2a48 (acpi_scan_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: acpi_suspend_begin+0x4c/0x80 [ 3290.970416] #6: ffffffff8280fca8 (dpm_list_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dpm_resume+0x12e/0x3e0 [ 3290.970428] stack backtrace: [ 3290.970431] CPU: 3 PID: 4553 Comm: systemd-sleep Tainted: G S 5.15.0+ #2420 [ 3290.970438] Hardware name: Dell Inc. XPS 13 9380/0RYJWW, BIOS 1.5.0 06/03/2019 [ 3290.970441] Call Trace: [ 3290.970446] dump_stack_lvl+0x44/0x57 [ 3290.970454] check_noncircular+0x105/0x120 [ 3290.970468] ? __lock_acquire+0x15cb/0x1b50 [ 3290.970474] __lock_acquire+0x15cb/0x1b50 [ 3290.970487] lock_acquire+0x26c/0x300 [ 3290.970493] ? flush_workqueue+0x87/0x4a0 [ 3290.970503] ? __raw_spin_lock_init+0x3b/0x60 [ 3290.970510] ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x58/0x240 [ 3290.970519] flush_workqueue+0xae/0x4a0 [ 3290.970526] ? flush_workqueue+0x87/0x4a0 [ 3290.970544] ? drain_workqueue+0xa1/0x130 [ 3290.970552] drain_workqueue+0xa1/0x130 [ 3290.970561] destroy_workqueue+0x34/0x1f0 [ 3290.970572] hci_release_dev+0x49/0x180 [bluetooth] [ 3290.970624] bt_host_release+0x1d/0x30 [bluetooth] [ 3290.970687] device_release+0x33/0x90 [ 3290.970695] kobject_release+0x63/0x160 [ 3290.970705] dpm_resume+0x164/0x3e0 [ 3290.970710] ? dpm_resume_early+0x251/0x3b0 [ 3290.970718] dpm_resume_end+0xd/0x20 [ 3290.970723] suspend_devices_and_enter+0x1a4/0xba0 [ 3290.970737] pm_suspend+0x26b/0x310 [ 3290.970746] state_store+0x42/0x90 [ 3290.970755] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x135/0x1b0 [ 3290.970764] new_sync_write+0x125/0x1c0 [ 3290.970777] vfs_write+0x360/0x3c0 [ 3290.970785] ksys_write+0xa7/0xe0 [ 3290.970794] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [ 3290.970803] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3290.970811] RIP: 0033:0x7f41b1328164 [ 3290.970819] Code: 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 8b 05 4a d2 2c 00 48 63 ff 85 c0 75 13 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 54 f3 c3 66 90 55 53 48 89 d5 48 89 f3 48 83 [ 3290.970824] RSP: 002b:00007ffe6ae21b28 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 [ 3290.970831] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007f41b1328164 [ 3290.970836] RDX: 0000000000000004 RSI: 000055965e651070 RDI: 0000000000000004 [ 3290.970839] RBP: 000055965e651070 R08: 000055965e64f390 R09: 00007f41b1e3d1c0 [ 3290.970843] R10: 000000000000000a R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000004 [ 3290.970846] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 000055965e64f2b0 R15: 0000000000000004 Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Often some test cases like btrfs/161 trigger lockdep splats that complain about possible unsafe lock scenario due to the fact that during mount, when reading the chunk tree we end up calling blkdev_get_by_path() while holding a read lock on a leaf of the chunk tree. That produces a lockdep splat like the following: [ 3653.683975] ====================================================== [ 3653.685148] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 3653.686301] 5.15.0-rc7-btrfs-next-103 #1 Not tainted [ 3653.687239] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 3653.688400] mount/447465 is trying to acquire lock: [ 3653.689320] ffff8c6b0c76e528 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.691054] but task is already holding lock: [ 3653.692155] ffff8c6b0a9f39e0 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 3653.693978] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 3653.695510] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 3653.696915] -> #3 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{3:3}: [ 3653.698053] down_read_nested+0x4b/0x140 [ 3653.698893] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 3653.699988] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 [btrfs] [ 3653.701205] btrfs_search_slot+0x537/0xc00 [btrfs] [ 3653.702234] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x32/0x70 [btrfs] [ 3653.703332] btrfs_init_new_device+0x563/0x15b0 [btrfs] [ 3653.704439] btrfs_ioctl+0x2110/0x3530 [btrfs] [ 3653.705405] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [ 3653.706215] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.706990] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.708040] -> #2 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}: [ 3653.708994] lock_release+0x13d/0x4a0 [ 3653.709533] up_write+0x18/0x160 [ 3653.710017] btrfs_sync_file+0x3f3/0x5b0 [btrfs] [ 3653.710699] __loop_update_dio+0xbd/0x170 [loop] [ 3653.711360] lo_ioctl+0x3b1/0x8a0 [loop] [ 3653.711929] block_ioctl+0x48/0x50 [ 3653.712442] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [ 3653.712991] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.713519] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.714233] -> #1 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3653.715026] __mutex_lock+0x92/0x900 [ 3653.715648] lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] [ 3653.716275] blkdev_get_whole+0x28/0x90 [ 3653.716867] blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x142/0x320 [ 3653.717537] blkdev_open+0x5e/0xa0 [ 3653.718043] do_dentry_open+0x163/0x390 [ 3653.718604] path_openat+0x3f0/0xa80 [ 3653.719128] do_filp_open+0xa9/0x150 [ 3653.719652] do_sys_openat2+0x97/0x160 [ 3653.720197] __x64_sys_openat+0x54/0x90 [ 3653.720766] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.721285] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.721986] -> #0 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3653.722775] __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210 [ 3653.723348] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310 [ 3653.723867] __mutex_lock+0x92/0x900 [ 3653.724394] blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.725041] blkdev_get_by_path+0xb8/0xd0 [ 3653.725614] btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb+0x1b/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 3653.726332] open_fs_devices+0xd7/0x2c0 [btrfs] [ 3653.726999] btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x3ad/0x870 [btrfs] [ 3653.727739] open_ctree+0xb8e/0x17bf [btrfs] [ 3653.728384] btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xde [btrfs] [ 3653.729130] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 3653.729676] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 3653.730192] vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 [ 3653.730800] btrfs_mount+0x11d/0x3a0 [btrfs] [ 3653.731427] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 3653.731970] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 3653.732486] path_mount+0x2d4/0xbe0 [ 3653.732997] __x64_sys_mount+0x103/0x140 [ 3653.733560] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.734080] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.734782] other info that might help us debug this: [ 3653.735784] Chain exists of: &disk->open_mutex --> sb_internal#2 --> btrfs-chunk-00 [ 3653.737123] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 3653.737865] CPU0 CPU1 [ 3653.738435] ---- ---- [ 3653.739007] lock(btrfs-chunk-00); [ 3653.739449] lock(sb_internal#2); [ 3653.740193] lock(btrfs-chunk-00); [ 3653.740955] lock(&disk->open_mutex); [ 3653.741431] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 3653.742176] 3 locks held by mount/447465: [ 3653.742739] #0: ffff8c6acf85c0e8 (&type->s_umount_key#44/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: alloc_super+0xd5/0x3b0 [ 3653.744114] #1: ffffffffc0b28f70 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x59/0x870 [btrfs] [ 3653.745563] #2: ffff8c6b0a9f39e0 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 3653.747066] stack backtrace: [ 3653.747723] CPU: 4 PID: 447465 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.15.0-rc7-btrfs-next-103 #1 [ 3653.748873] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 3653.750592] Call Trace: [ 3653.750967] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 [ 3653.751526] check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110 [ 3653.752136] ? stack_trace_save+0x4b/0x70 [ 3653.752748] __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210 [ 3653.753356] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310 [ 3653.753898] ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.754596] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe8/0x140 [ 3653.755125] ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.755729] ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.756338] __mutex_lock+0x92/0x900 [ 3653.756794] ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.757400] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0 [ 3653.757930] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40 [ 3653.758437] ? bd_prepare_to_claim+0x129/0x150 [ 3653.758999] ? trace_module_get+0x2b/0xd0 [ 3653.759508] ? try_module_get.part.0+0x50/0x80 [ 3653.760072] blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.760661] ? devcgroup_check_permission+0xc1/0x1f0 [ 3653.761288] blkdev_get_by_path+0xb8/0xd0 [ 3653.761797] btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb+0x1b/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 3653.762454] open_fs_devices+0xd7/0x2c0 [btrfs] [ 3653.763055] ? clone_fs_devices+0x8f/0x170 [btrfs] [ 3653.763689] btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x3ad/0x870 [btrfs] [ 3653.764370] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x14/0x40 [ 3653.764922] open_ctree+0xb8e/0x17bf [btrfs] [ 3653.765493] ? super_setup_bdi_name+0x79/0xd0 [ 3653.766043] btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xde [btrfs] [ 3653.766780] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80 [ 3653.767488] ? kfree+0x1f2/0x3c0 [ 3653.767979] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 3653.768548] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 3653.769076] vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 [ 3653.769718] btrfs_mount+0x11d/0x3a0 [btrfs] [ 3653.770381] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80 [ 3653.771086] ? kfree+0x1f2/0x3c0 [ 3653.771574] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 3653.772136] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 3653.772673] path_mount+0x2d4/0xbe0 [ 3653.773201] __x64_sys_mount+0x103/0x140 [ 3653.773793] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.774333] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.775094] RIP: 0033:0x7f648bc45aaa This happens because through btrfs_read_chunk_tree(), which is called only during mount, ends up acquiring the mutex open_mutex of a block device while holding a read lock on a leaf of the chunk tree while other paths need to acquire other locks before locking extent buffers of the chunk tree. Since at mount time when we call btrfs_read_chunk_tree() we know that we don't have other tasks running in parallel and modifying the chunk tree, we can simply skip locking of chunk tree extent buffers. So do that and move the assertion that checks the fs is not yet mounted to the top block of btrfs_read_chunk_tree(), with a comment before doing it. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

[ Upstream commit 54659ca ] when turning off a connection, lockdep complains with the following warning (a modprobe has been done but the same happens with a disconnection from NetworkManager, it's enough to trigger a cfg80211_disconnect call): [ 682.855867] ====================================================== [ 682.855877] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 682.855887] 5.14.0-rc6+ #16 Tainted: G C OE [ 682.855898] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 682.855906] modprobe/1770 is trying to acquire lock: [ 682.855916] ffffb6d000332b00 (&pxmitpriv->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: rtw_free_stainfo+0x52/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.856073] but task is already holding lock: [ 682.856081] ffffb6d0003336a8 (&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: rtw_free_assoc_resources+0x48/0x110 [r8723bs] [ 682.856207] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 682.856215] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 682.856223] -> #1 (&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}: [ 682.856247] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 [ 682.856265] rtw_get_stainfo+0x9a/0x110 [r8723bs] [ 682.856389] rtw_xmit_classifier+0x27/0x130 [r8723bs] [ 682.856515] rtw_xmitframe_enqueue+0xa/0x20 [r8723bs] [ 682.856642] rtl8723bs_hal_xmit+0x3b/0xb0 [r8723bs] [ 682.856752] rtw_xmit+0x4ef/0x890 [r8723bs] [ 682.856879] _rtw_xmit_entry+0xba/0x350 [r8723bs] [ 682.856981] dev_hard_start_xmit+0xee/0x320 [ 682.856999] sch_direct_xmit+0x8c/0x330 [ 682.857014] __dev_queue_xmit+0xba5/0xf00 [ 682.857030] packet_sendmsg+0x981/0x1b80 [ 682.857047] sock_sendmsg+0x5b/0x60 [ 682.857060] __sys_sendto+0xf1/0x160 [ 682.857073] __x64_sys_sendto+0x24/0x30 [ 682.857087] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [ 682.857102] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 682.857117] -> #0 (&pxmitpriv->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}: [ 682.857142] __lock_acquire+0xfd9/0x1b50 [ 682.857158] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x2c0 [ 682.857172] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 [ 682.857185] rtw_free_stainfo+0x52/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.857308] rtw_free_assoc_resources+0x53/0x110 [r8723bs] [ 682.857415] cfg80211_rtw_disconnect+0x4b/0x70 [r8723bs] [ 682.857522] cfg80211_disconnect+0x12e/0x2f0 [cfg80211] [ 682.857759] cfg80211_leave+0x2b/0x40 [cfg80211] [ 682.857961] cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call+0xa9/0x560 [cfg80211] [ 682.858163] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x41/0x50 [ 682.858180] __dev_close_many+0x62/0x100 [ 682.858195] dev_close_many+0x7d/0x120 [ 682.858209] unregister_netdevice_many+0x416/0x680 [ 682.858225] unregister_netdevice_queue+0xab/0xf0 [ 682.858240] unregister_netdev+0x18/0x20 [ 682.858255] rtw_unregister_netdevs+0x28/0x40 [r8723bs] [ 682.858360] rtw_dev_remove+0x24/0xd0 [r8723bs] [ 682.858463] sdio_bus_remove+0x31/0xd0 [mmc_core] [ 682.858532] device_release_driver_internal+0xf7/0x1d0 [ 682.858550] driver_detach+0x47/0x90 [ 682.858564] bus_remove_driver+0x77/0xd0 [ 682.858579] rtw_drv_halt+0xc/0x678 [r8723bs] [ 682.858685] __x64_sys_delete_module+0x13f/0x250 [ 682.858699] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [ 682.858715] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 682.858729] other info that might help us debug this: [ 682.858737] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 682.858744] CPU0 CPU1 [ 682.858751] ---- ---- [ 682.858758] lock(&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock); [ 682.858772] lock(&pxmitpriv->lock); [ 682.858786] lock(&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock); [ 682.858799] lock(&pxmitpriv->lock); [ 682.858812] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 682.858820] 5 locks held by modprobe/1770: [ 682.858831] #0: ffff8d870697d980 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x1a/0x1d0 [ 682.858869] #1: ffffffffbdbbf1c8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: unregister_netdev+0xe/0x20 [ 682.858906] #2: ffff8d87054ee5e8 (&rdev->wiphy.mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call+0x9e/0x560 [cfg80211] [ 682.859131] #3: ffff8d870f2bc8f0 (&wdev->mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cfg80211_leave+0x20/0x40 [cfg80211] [ 682.859354] #4: ffffb6d0003336a8 (&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: rtw_free_assoc_resources+0x48/0x110 [r8723bs] [ 682.859482] stack backtrace: [ 682.859491] CPU: 1 PID: 1770 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G C OE 5.14.0-rc6+ #16 [ 682.859507] Hardware name: LENOVO 80NR/Madrid, BIOS DACN25WW 08/20/2015 [ 682.859517] Call Trace: [ 682.859531] dump_stack_lvl+0x56/0x6f [ 682.859551] check_noncircular+0xdb/0xf0 [ 682.859579] __lock_acquire+0xfd9/0x1b50 [ 682.859606] lock_acquire+0xb4/0x2c0 [ 682.859623] ? rtw_free_stainfo+0x52/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.859752] ? mark_held_locks+0x48/0x70 [ 682.859769] ? rtw_free_stainfo+0x4a/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.859898] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 [ 682.859914] ? rtw_free_stainfo+0x52/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.860039] rtw_free_stainfo+0x52/0x4a0 [r8723bs] [ 682.860171] rtw_free_assoc_resources+0x53/0x110 [r8723bs] [ 682.860286] cfg80211_rtw_disconnect+0x4b/0x70 [r8723bs] [ 682.860397] cfg80211_disconnect+0x12e/0x2f0 [cfg80211] [ 682.860629] cfg80211_leave+0x2b/0x40 [cfg80211] [ 682.860836] cfg80211_netdev_notifier_call+0xa9/0x560 [cfg80211] [ 682.861048] ? __lock_acquire+0x4dc/0x1b50 [ 682.861070] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa8/0x110 [ 682.861089] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa8/0x110 [ 682.861104] ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90 [ 682.861120] ? packet_notifier+0x173/0x300 [ 682.861141] ? lock_release+0xb3/0x250 [ 682.861160] ? packet_notifier+0x192/0x300 [ 682.861184] raw_notifier_call_chain+0x41/0x50 [ 682.861205] __dev_close_many+0x62/0x100 [ 682.861224] dev_close_many+0x7d/0x120 [ 682.861245] unregister_netdevice_many+0x416/0x680 [ 682.861264] ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90 [ 682.861284] unregister_netdevice_queue+0xab/0xf0 [ 682.861306] unregister_netdev+0x18/0x20 [ 682.861325] rtw_unregister_netdevs+0x28/0x40 [r8723bs] [ 682.861434] rtw_dev_remove+0x24/0xd0 [r8723bs] [ 682.861542] sdio_bus_remove+0x31/0xd0 [mmc_core] [ 682.861615] device_release_driver_internal+0xf7/0x1d0 [ 682.861637] driver_detach+0x47/0x90 [ 682.861656] bus_remove_driver+0x77/0xd0 [ 682.861674] rtw_drv_halt+0xc/0x678 [r8723bs] [ 682.861782] __x64_sys_delete_module+0x13f/0x250 [ 682.861801] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xf3/0x170 [ 682.861817] ? syscall_enter_from_user_mode+0x20/0x70 [ 682.861836] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x80 [ 682.861855] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 682.861873] RIP: 0033:0x7f6dbe85400b [ 682.861890] Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 6d 1e 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa b8 b0 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 3d 1e 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [ 682.861906] RSP: 002b:00007ffe7a82f538 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0 [ 682.861923] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055a64693bd20 RCX: 00007f6dbe85400b [ 682.861935] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 000055a64693bd88 [ 682.861946] RBP: 000055a64693bd20 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 682.861957] R10: 00007f6dbe8c7ac0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 000055a64693bd88 [ 682.861967] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000055a64693bd88 R15: 00007ffe7a831848 This happens because when we enqueue a frame for transmission we do it under xmit_priv lock, then calling rtw_get_stainfo (needed for enqueuing) takes sta_hash_lock and this leads to the following lock dependency: xmit_priv->lock -> sta_hash_lock Turning off a connection will bring to call rtw_free_assoc_resources which will set up the inverse dependency: sta_hash_lock -> xmit_priv_lock This could lead to a deadlock as lockdep complains. Fix it by removing the xmit_priv->lock around rtw_xmitframe_enqueue call inside rtl8723bs_hal_xmit and put it in a smaller critical section inside rtw_xmit_classifier, the only place where xmit_priv data are actually accessed. Replace spin_{lock,unlock}_bh(pxmitpriv->lock) in other tx paths leading to rtw_xmitframe_enqueue call with spin_{lock,unlock}_bh(psta->sleep_q.lock) - it's not clear why accessing a sleep_q was protected by a spinlock on xmitpriv->lock. This way is avoided the same faulty lock nesting order. Extra changes in v2 by Hans de Goede: -Lift the taking of the struct __queue.lock spinlock out of rtw_free_xmitframe_queue() into the callers this allows also protecting a bunch of related state in rtw_free_stainfo(): -Protect psta->sleepq_len on rtw_free_xmitframe_queue(&psta->sleep_q); -Protect struct tx_servq.tx_pending and tx_servq.qcnt when calling rtw_free_xmitframe_queue(&tx_servq.sta_pending) -This also allows moving the spin_lock_bh(&pxmitpriv->lock); to below the sleep_q free-ing code, avoiding another ABBA locking issue CC: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> Co-developed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Tested-on: Lenovo Ideapad MiiX 300-10IBY Signed-off-by: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210920145502.155454-1-hdegoede@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit bdc1bbd ] The assoc_timer takes the pmlmepriv->lock and various functions which take the pmlmepriv->scanned_queue.lock first take the pmlmepriv->lock, this means that we cannot have code which waits for the timer (timer_del_sync) while holding the pmlmepriv->scanned_queue.lock to avoid a triangle deadlock: [ 363.139361] ====================================================== [ 363.139377] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 363.139396] 5.15.0-rc1+ #470 Tainted: G C E [ 363.139413] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 363.139424] RTW_CMD_THREAD/2466 is trying to acquire lock: [ 363.139441] ffffbacd00699038 (&pmlmepriv->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}, at: _rtw_join_timeout_handler+0x3c/0x160 [r8723bs] [ 363.139598] but task is already holding lock: [ 363.139610] ffffbacd00128ea0 ((&pmlmepriv->assoc_timer)){+.-.}-{0:0}, at: call_timer_fn+0x5/0x260 [ 363.139673] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 363.139684] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 363.139696] -> #2 ((&pmlmepriv->assoc_timer)){+.-.}-{0:0}: [ 363.139734] del_timer_sync+0x59/0x100 [ 363.139762] rtw_joinbss_event_prehandle+0x342/0x640 [r8723bs] [ 363.139870] report_join_res+0xdf/0x110 [r8723bs] [ 363.139980] OnAssocRsp+0x17a/0x200 [r8723bs] [ 363.140092] rtw_recv_entry+0x190/0x1120 [r8723bs] [ 363.140209] rtl8723b_process_phy_info+0x3f9/0x750 [r8723bs] [ 363.140318] tasklet_action_common.constprop.0+0xe8/0x110 [ 363.140345] __do_softirq+0xde/0x485 [ 363.140372] __irq_exit_rcu+0xd0/0x100 [ 363.140393] irq_exit_rcu+0xa/0x20 [ 363.140413] common_interrupt+0x83/0xa0 [ 363.140440] asm_common_interrupt+0x1e/0x40 [ 363.140463] finish_task_switch.isra.0+0x157/0x3d0 [ 363.140492] __schedule+0x447/0x1880 [ 363.140516] schedule+0x59/0xc0 [ 363.140537] smpboot_thread_fn+0x161/0x1c0 [ 363.140565] kthread+0x143/0x160 [ 363.140585] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 363.140614] -> #1 (&pmlmepriv->scanned_queue.lock){+.-.}-{2:2}: [ 363.140653] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 [ 363.140675] rtw_free_network_queue+0x31/0x80 [r8723bs] [ 363.140776] rtw_sitesurvey_cmd+0x79/0x1e0 [r8723bs] [ 363.140869] rtw_cfg80211_surveydone_event_callback+0x3cf/0x470 [r8723bs] [ 363.140973] rdev_scan+0x42/0x1a0 [cfg80211] [ 363.141307] nl80211_trigger_scan+0x566/0x660 [cfg80211] [ 363.141635] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xcd/0x110 [ 363.141661] genl_rcv_msg+0xce/0x1c0 [ 363.141680] netlink_rcv_skb+0x50/0xf0 [ 363.141699] genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 [ 363.141717] netlink_unicast+0x16d/0x230 [ 363.141736] netlink_sendmsg+0x22b/0x450 [ 363.141755] sock_sendmsg+0x5e/0x60 [ 363.141781] ____sys_sendmsg+0x22f/0x270 [ 363.141803] ___sys_sendmsg+0x81/0xc0 [ 363.141828] __sys_sendmsg+0x49/0x80 [ 363.141851] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 [ 363.141873] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 363.141895] -> #0 (&pmlmepriv->lock){+.-.}-{2:2}: [ 363.141930] __lock_acquire+0x1158/0x1de0 [ 363.141954] lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 [ 363.141974] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 [ 363.141993] _rtw_join_timeout_handler+0x3c/0x160 [r8723bs] [ 363.142097] call_timer_fn+0x94/0x260 [ 363.142122] __run_timers.part.0+0x1bf/0x290 [ 363.142147] run_timer_softirq+0x26/0x50 [ 363.142171] __do_softirq+0xde/0x485 [ 363.142193] __irq_exit_rcu+0xd0/0x100 [ 363.142215] irq_exit_rcu+0xa/0x20 [ 363.142235] sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x72/0x90 [ 363.142260] asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20 [ 363.142283] __module_address.part.0+0x0/0xd0 [ 363.142309] is_module_address+0x25/0x40 [ 363.142334] static_obj+0x4f/0x60 [ 363.142361] lockdep_init_map_type+0x47/0x220 [ 363.142382] __init_swait_queue_head+0x45/0x60 [ 363.142408] mmc_wait_for_req+0x4a/0xc0 [mmc_core] [ 363.142504] mmc_wait_for_cmd+0x55/0x70 [mmc_core] [ 363.142592] mmc_io_rw_direct+0x75/0xe0 [mmc_core] [ 363.142691] sdio_writeb+0x2e/0x50 [mmc_core] [ 363.142788] _sd_cmd52_write+0x62/0x80 [r8723bs] [ 363.142885] sd_cmd52_write+0x6c/0xb0 [r8723bs] [ 363.142981] rtl8723bs_set_hal_ops+0x982/0x9b0 [r8723bs] [ 363.143089] rtw_write16+0x1e/0x30 [r8723bs] [ 363.143184] SetHwReg8723B+0xcc9/0xd30 [r8723bs] [ 363.143294] mlmeext_joinbss_event_callback+0x17a/0x1a0 [r8723bs] [ 363.143405] rtw_joinbss_event_callback+0x11/0x20 [r8723bs] [ 363.143507] mlme_evt_hdl+0x4d/0x70 [r8723bs] [ 363.143620] rtw_cmd_thread+0x168/0x3c0 [r8723bs] [ 363.143712] kthread+0x143/0x160 [ 363.143732] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [ 363.143757] other info that might help us debug this: [ 363.143768] Chain exists of: &pmlmepriv->lock --> &pmlmepriv->scanned_queue.lock --> (&pmlmepriv->assoc_timer) [ 363.143809] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 363.143819] CPU0 CPU1 [ 363.143831] ---- ---- [ 363.143841] lock((&pmlmepriv->assoc_timer)); [ 363.143862] lock(&pmlmepriv->scanned_queue.lock); [ 363.143882] lock((&pmlmepriv->assoc_timer)); [ 363.143902] lock(&pmlmepriv->lock); [ 363.143921] *** DEADLOCK *** Make rtw_joinbss_event_prehandle() release the scanned_queue.lock before it deletes the timer to avoid this (it is still holding pmlmepriv->lock protecting against racing the timer). Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210920145502.155454-3-hdegoede@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

[ Upstream commit f347c26 ] The following issue was observed running syzkaller: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in memcpy include/linux/string.h:377 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0 lib/scatterlist.c:831 Read of size 2132 at addr ffff8880aea95dc8 by task syz-executor.0/9815 CPU: 0 PID: 9815 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 4.19.202-00874-gfc0fe04215a9 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0xe4/0x14a lib/dump_stack.c:118 print_address_description+0x73/0x280 mm/kasan/report.c:253 kasan_report_error mm/kasan/report.c:352 [inline] kasan_report+0x272/0x370 mm/kasan/report.c:410 memcpy+0x1f/0x50 mm/kasan/kasan.c:302 memcpy include/linux/string.h:377 [inline] sg_copy_buffer+0x150/0x1c0 lib/scatterlist.c:831 fill_from_dev_buffer+0x14f/0x340 drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c:1021 resp_report_tgtpgs+0x5aa/0x770 drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c:1772 schedule_resp+0x464/0x12f0 drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c:4429 scsi_debug_queuecommand+0x467/0x1390 drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c:5835 scsi_dispatch_cmd+0x3fc/0x9b0 drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:1896 scsi_request_fn+0x1042/0x1810 drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:2034 __blk_run_queue_uncond block/blk-core.c:464 [inline] __blk_run_queue+0x1a4/0x380 block/blk-core.c:484 blk_execute_rq_nowait+0x1c2/0x2d0 block/blk-exec.c:78 sg_common_write.isra.19+0xd74/0x1dc0 drivers/scsi/sg.c:847 sg_write.part.23+0x6e0/0xd00 drivers/scsi/sg.c:716 sg_write+0x64/0xa0 drivers/scsi/sg.c:622 __vfs_write+0xed/0x690 fs/read_write.c:485 kill_bdev:block_device:00000000e138492c vfs_write+0x184/0x4c0 fs/read_write.c:549 ksys_write+0x107/0x240 fs/read_write.c:599 do_syscall_64+0xc2/0x560 arch/x86/entry/common.c:293 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe We get 'alen' from command its type is int. If userspace passes a large length we will get a negative 'alen'. Switch n, alen, and rlen to u32. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211013033913.2551004-3-yebin10@huawei.com Acked-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com> Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

Ido Schimmel says: ==================== mlxsw: Two small fixes Patch #1 fixes a recent regression that prevents the driver from loading with old firmware versions. Patch #2 protects the driver from a NULL pointer dereference when working on top of a buggy firmware. This was never observed in an actual system, only on top of an emulator during development. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

…/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD KVM/arm64 fixes for 5.16, take #2 - Fix constant sign extension affecting TCR_EL2 and preventing running on ARMv8.7 models due to spurious bits being set - Fix use of helpers using PSTATE early on exit by always sampling it as soon as the exit takes place - Move pkvm's 32bit handling into a common helper

[ Upstream commit 4d9380e ] Often some test cases like btrfs/161 trigger lockdep splats that complain about possible unsafe lock scenario due to the fact that during mount, when reading the chunk tree we end up calling blkdev_get_by_path() while holding a read lock on a leaf of the chunk tree. That produces a lockdep splat like the following: [ 3653.683975] ====================================================== [ 3653.685148] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 3653.686301] 5.15.0-rc7-btrfs-next-103 #1 Not tainted [ 3653.687239] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 3653.688400] mount/447465 is trying to acquire lock: [ 3653.689320] ffff8c6b0c76e528 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.691054] but task is already holding lock: [ 3653.692155] ffff8c6b0a9f39e0 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 3653.693978] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 3653.695510] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 3653.696915] -> #3 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{3:3}: [ 3653.698053] down_read_nested+0x4b/0x140 [ 3653.698893] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 3653.699988] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 [btrfs] [ 3653.701205] btrfs_search_slot+0x537/0xc00 [btrfs] [ 3653.702234] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x32/0x70 [btrfs] [ 3653.703332] btrfs_init_new_device+0x563/0x15b0 [btrfs] [ 3653.704439] btrfs_ioctl+0x2110/0x3530 [btrfs] [ 3653.705405] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [ 3653.706215] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.706990] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.708040] -> #2 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}: [ 3653.708994] lock_release+0x13d/0x4a0 [ 3653.709533] up_write+0x18/0x160 [ 3653.710017] btrfs_sync_file+0x3f3/0x5b0 [btrfs] [ 3653.710699] __loop_update_dio+0xbd/0x170 [loop] [ 3653.711360] lo_ioctl+0x3b1/0x8a0 [loop] [ 3653.711929] block_ioctl+0x48/0x50 [ 3653.712442] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [ 3653.712991] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.713519] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.714233] -> #1 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3653.715026] __mutex_lock+0x92/0x900 [ 3653.715648] lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] [ 3653.716275] blkdev_get_whole+0x28/0x90 [ 3653.716867] blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x142/0x320 [ 3653.717537] blkdev_open+0x5e/0xa0 [ 3653.718043] do_dentry_open+0x163/0x390 [ 3653.718604] path_openat+0x3f0/0xa80 [ 3653.719128] do_filp_open+0xa9/0x150 [ 3653.719652] do_sys_openat2+0x97/0x160 [ 3653.720197] __x64_sys_openat+0x54/0x90 [ 3653.720766] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.721285] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.721986] -> #0 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3653.722775] __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210 [ 3653.723348] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310 [ 3653.723867] __mutex_lock+0x92/0x900 [ 3653.724394] blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.725041] blkdev_get_by_path+0xb8/0xd0 [ 3653.725614] btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb+0x1b/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 3653.726332] open_fs_devices+0xd7/0x2c0 [btrfs] [ 3653.726999] btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x3ad/0x870 [btrfs] [ 3653.727739] open_ctree+0xb8e/0x17bf [btrfs] [ 3653.728384] btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xde [btrfs] [ 3653.729130] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 3653.729676] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 3653.730192] vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 [ 3653.730800] btrfs_mount+0x11d/0x3a0 [btrfs] [ 3653.731427] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 3653.731970] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 3653.732486] path_mount+0x2d4/0xbe0 [ 3653.732997] __x64_sys_mount+0x103/0x140 [ 3653.733560] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.734080] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.734782] other info that might help us debug this: [ 3653.735784] Chain exists of: &disk->open_mutex --> sb_internal#2 --> btrfs-chunk-00 [ 3653.737123] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 3653.737865] CPU0 CPU1 [ 3653.738435] ---- ---- [ 3653.739007] lock(btrfs-chunk-00); [ 3653.739449] lock(sb_internal#2); [ 3653.740193] lock(btrfs-chunk-00); [ 3653.740955] lock(&disk->open_mutex); [ 3653.741431] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 3653.742176] 3 locks held by mount/447465: [ 3653.742739] #0: ffff8c6acf85c0e8 (&type->s_umount_key#44/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: alloc_super+0xd5/0x3b0 [ 3653.744114] #1: ffffffffc0b28f70 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x59/0x870 [btrfs] [ 3653.745563] #2: ffff8c6b0a9f39e0 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 3653.747066] stack backtrace: [ 3653.747723] CPU: 4 PID: 447465 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.15.0-rc7-btrfs-next-103 #1 [ 3653.748873] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 3653.750592] Call Trace: [ 3653.750967] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 [ 3653.751526] check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110 [ 3653.752136] ? stack_trace_save+0x4b/0x70 [ 3653.752748] __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210 [ 3653.753356] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310 [ 3653.753898] ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.754596] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe8/0x140 [ 3653.755125] ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.755729] ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.756338] __mutex_lock+0x92/0x900 [ 3653.756794] ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.757400] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0 [ 3653.757930] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40 [ 3653.758437] ? bd_prepare_to_claim+0x129/0x150 [ 3653.758999] ? trace_module_get+0x2b/0xd0 [ 3653.759508] ? try_module_get.part.0+0x50/0x80 [ 3653.760072] blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.760661] ? devcgroup_check_permission+0xc1/0x1f0 [ 3653.761288] blkdev_get_by_path+0xb8/0xd0 [ 3653.761797] btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb+0x1b/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 3653.762454] open_fs_devices+0xd7/0x2c0 [btrfs] [ 3653.763055] ? clone_fs_devices+0x8f/0x170 [btrfs] [ 3653.763689] btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x3ad/0x870 [btrfs] [ 3653.764370] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x14/0x40 [ 3653.764922] open_ctree+0xb8e/0x17bf [btrfs] [ 3653.765493] ? super_setup_bdi_name+0x79/0xd0 [ 3653.766043] btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xde [btrfs] [ 3653.766780] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80 [ 3653.767488] ? kfree+0x1f2/0x3c0 [ 3653.767979] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 3653.768548] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 3653.769076] vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 [ 3653.769718] btrfs_mount+0x11d/0x3a0 [btrfs] [ 3653.770381] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80 [ 3653.771086] ? kfree+0x1f2/0x3c0 [ 3653.771574] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 3653.772136] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 3653.772673] path_mount+0x2d4/0xbe0 [ 3653.773201] __x64_sys_mount+0x103/0x140 [ 3653.773793] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.774333] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.775094] RIP: 0033:0x7f648bc45aaa This happens because through btrfs_read_chunk_tree(), which is called only during mount, ends up acquiring the mutex open_mutex of a block device while holding a read lock on a leaf of the chunk tree while other paths need to acquire other locks before locking extent buffers of the chunk tree. Since at mount time when we call btrfs_read_chunk_tree() we know that we don't have other tasks running in parallel and modifying the chunk tree, we can simply skip locking of chunk tree extent buffers. So do that and move the assertion that checks the fs is not yet mounted to the top block of btrfs_read_chunk_tree(), with a comment before doing it. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

…_lock Taking sb_writers whilst holding mmap_lock isn't allowed and will result in a lockdep warning like that below. The problem comes from cachefiles needing to take the sb_writers lock in order to do a write to the cache, but being asked to do this by netfslib called from readpage, readahead or write_begin[1]. Fix this by always offloading the write to the cache off to a worker thread. The main thread doesn't need to wait for it, so deadlock can be avoided. This can be tested by running the quick xfstests on something like afs or ceph with lockdep enabled. WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.15.0-rc1-build2+ #292 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ holetest/65517 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88810c81d730 (mapping.invalidate_lock#3){.+.+}-{3:3}, at: filemap_fault+0x276/0x7a5 but task is already holding lock: ffff8881595b53e8 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: do_user_addr_fault+0x28d/0x59c which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}: validate_chain+0x3c4/0x4a8 __lock_acquire+0x89d/0x949 lock_acquire+0x2dc/0x34b __might_fault+0x87/0xb1 strncpy_from_user+0x25/0x18c removexattr+0x7c/0xe5 __do_sys_fremovexattr+0x73/0x96 do_syscall_64+0x67/0x7a entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #1 (sb_writers#10){.+.+}-{0:0}: validate_chain+0x3c4/0x4a8 __lock_acquire+0x89d/0x949 lock_acquire+0x2dc/0x34b cachefiles_write+0x2b3/0x4bb netfs_rreq_do_write_to_cache+0x3b5/0x432 netfs_readpage+0x2de/0x39d filemap_read_page+0x51/0x94 filemap_get_pages+0x26f/0x413 filemap_read+0x182/0x427 new_sync_read+0xf0/0x161 vfs_read+0x118/0x16e ksys_read+0xb8/0x12e do_syscall_64+0x67/0x7a entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #0 (mapping.invalidate_lock#3){.+.+}-{3:3}: check_noncircular+0xe4/0x129 check_prev_add+0x16b/0x3a4 validate_chain+0x3c4/0x4a8 __lock_acquire+0x89d/0x949 lock_acquire+0x2dc/0x34b down_read+0x40/0x4a filemap_fault+0x276/0x7a5 __do_fault+0x96/0xbf do_fault+0x262/0x35a __handle_mm_fault+0x171/0x1b5 handle_mm_fault+0x12a/0x233 do_user_addr_fault+0x3d2/0x59c exc_page_fault+0x85/0xa5 asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: mapping.invalidate_lock#3 --> sb_writers#10 --> &mm->mmap_lock#2 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2); lock(sb_writers#10); lock(&mm->mmap_lock#2); lock(mapping.invalidate_lock#3); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by holetest/65517: #0: ffff8881595b53e8 (&mm->mmap_lock#2){++++}-{3:3}, at: do_user_addr_fault+0x28d/0x59c stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 65517 Comm: holetest Not tainted 5.15.0-rc1-build2+ #292 Hardware name: ASUS All Series/H97-PLUS, BIOS 2306 10/09/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x45/0x59 check_noncircular+0xe4/0x129 ? print_circular_bug+0x207/0x207 ? validate_chain+0x461/0x4a8 ? add_chain_block+0x88/0xd9 ? hlist_add_head_rcu+0x49/0x53 check_prev_add+0x16b/0x3a4 validate_chain+0x3c4/0x4a8 ? check_prev_add+0x3a4/0x3a4 ? mark_lock+0xa5/0x1c6 __lock_acquire+0x89d/0x949 lock_acquire+0x2dc/0x34b ? filemap_fault+0x276/0x7a5 ? rcu_read_unlock+0x59/0x59 ? add_to_page_cache_lru+0x13c/0x13c ? lock_is_held_type+0x7b/0xd3 down_read+0x40/0x4a ? filemap_fault+0x276/0x7a5 filemap_fault+0x276/0x7a5 ? pagecache_get_page+0x2dd/0x2dd ? __lock_acquire+0x8bc/0x949 ? pte_offset_kernel.isra.0+0x6d/0xc3 __do_fault+0x96/0xbf ? do_fault+0x124/0x35a do_fault+0x262/0x35a ? handle_pte_fault+0x1c1/0x20d __handle_mm_fault+0x171/0x1b5 ? handle_pte_fault+0x20d/0x20d ? __lock_release+0x151/0x254 ? mark_held_locks+0x1f/0x78 ? rcu_read_unlock+0x3a/0x59 handle_mm_fault+0x12a/0x233 do_user_addr_fault+0x3d2/0x59c ? pgtable_bad+0x70/0x70 ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xab/0xab exc_page_fault+0x85/0xa5 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x8/0x30 asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30 RIP: 0033:0x40192f Code: ff 48 89 c3 48 8b 05 50 28 00 00 48 85 ed 7e 23 31 d2 4b 8d 0c 2f eb 0a 0f 1f 00 48 8b 05 39 28 00 00 48 0f af c2 48 83 c2 01 <48> 89 1c 01 48 39 d5 7f e8 8b 0d f2 27 00 00 31 c0 85 c9 74 0e 8b RSP: 002b:00007f9931867eb0 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007f9931868700 RCX: 00007f993206ac00 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 00007ffc13e06ee0 RBP: 0000000000000100 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007f9931868700 R10: 00007f99318689d0 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 00007ffc13e06ee0 R13: 0000000000000c00 R14: 00007ffc13e06e00 R15: 00007f993206a000 Fixes: 726218f ("netfs: Define an interface to talk to a cache") Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> cc: linux-cachefs@redhat.com cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210922110420.GA21576@quack2.suse.cz/ [1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163887597541.1596626.2668163316598972956.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ # v1

In line 800 (#1), nfp_cpp_area_alloc() allocates and initializes a CPP area structure. But in line 807 (#2), when the cache is allocated failed, this CPP area structure is not freed, which will result in memory leak. We can fix it by freeing the CPP area when the cache is allocated failed (#2). 792 int nfp_cpp_area_cache_add(struct nfp_cpp *cpp, size_t size) 793 { 794 struct nfp_cpp_area_cache *cache; 795 struct nfp_cpp_area *area; 800 area = nfp_cpp_area_alloc(cpp, NFP_CPP_ID(7, NFP_CPP_ACTION_RW, 0), 801 0, size); // #1: allocates and initializes 802 if (!area) 803 return -ENOMEM; 805 cache = kzalloc(sizeof(*cache), GFP_KERNEL); 806 if (!cache) 807 return -ENOMEM; // #2: missing free 817 return 0; 818 } Fixes: 4cb584e ("nfp: add CPP access core") Signed-off-by: Jianglei Nie <niejianglei2021@163.com> Acked-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211209061511.122535-1-niejianglei2021@163.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

commit c56c963 upstream. In line 800 (#1), nfp_cpp_area_alloc() allocates and initializes a CPP area structure. But in line 807 (#2), when the cache is allocated failed, this CPP area structure is not freed, which will result in memory leak. We can fix it by freeing the CPP area when the cache is allocated failed (#2). 792 int nfp_cpp_area_cache_add(struct nfp_cpp *cpp, size_t size) 793 { 794 struct nfp_cpp_area_cache *cache; 795 struct nfp_cpp_area *area; 800 area = nfp_cpp_area_alloc(cpp, NFP_CPP_ID(7, NFP_CPP_ACTION_RW, 0), 801 0, size); // #1: allocates and initializes 802 if (!area) 803 return -ENOMEM; 805 cache = kzalloc(sizeof(*cache), GFP_KERNEL); 806 if (!cache) 807 return -ENOMEM; // #2: missing free 817 return 0; 818 } Fixes: 4cb584e ("nfp: add CPP access core") Signed-off-by: Jianglei Nie <niejianglei2021@163.com> Acked-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211209061511.122535-1-niejianglei2021@163.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Ido Schimmel says: ==================== mlxsw: MAC profiles occupancy fix Patch #1 fixes a router interface (RIF) MAC profiles occupancy bug that was merged in the last cycle. Patch #2 adds a selftest that fails without the fix. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Line 1169 (#3) allocates a memory chunk for victim_name by kmalloc(), but when the function returns in line 1184 (#4) victim_name allocated by line 1169 (#3) is not freed, which will lead to a memory leak. There is a similar snippet of code in this function as allocating a memory chunk for victim_name in line 1104 (#1) as well as releasing the memory in line 1116 (#2). We should kfree() victim_name when the return value of backref_in_log() is less than zero and before the function returns in line 1184 (#4). 1057 static inline int __add_inode_ref(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, 1058 struct btrfs_root *root, 1059 struct btrfs_path *path, 1060 struct btrfs_root *log_root, 1061 struct btrfs_inode *dir, 1062 struct btrfs_inode *inode, 1063 u64 inode_objectid, u64 parent_objectid, 1064 u64 ref_index, char *name, int namelen, 1065 int *search_done) 1066 { 1104 victim_name = kmalloc(victim_name_len, GFP_NOFS); // #1: kmalloc (victim_name-1) 1105 if (!victim_name) 1106 return -ENOMEM; 1112 ret = backref_in_log(log_root, &search_key, 1113 parent_objectid, victim_name, 1114 victim_name_len); 1115 if (ret < 0) { 1116 kfree(victim_name); // #2: kfree (victim_name-1) 1117 return ret; 1118 } else if (!ret) { 1169 victim_name = kmalloc(victim_name_len, GFP_NOFS); // #3: kmalloc (victim_name-2) 1170 if (!victim_name) 1171 return -ENOMEM; 1180 ret = backref_in_log(log_root, &search_key, 1181 parent_objectid, victim_name, 1182 victim_name_len); 1183 if (ret < 0) { 1184 return ret; // #4: missing kfree (victim_name-2) 1185 } else if (!ret) { 1241 return 0; 1242 } Fixes: d3316c8 ("btrfs: Properly handle backref_in_log retval") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Jianglei Nie <niejianglei2021@163.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The fixed commit attempts to close inject.output even if it was never opened e.g. $ perf record uname Linux [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.002 MB perf.data (7 samples) ] $ perf inject -i perf.data --vm-time-correlation=dry-run Segmentation fault (core dumped) $ gdb --quiet perf Reading symbols from perf... (gdb) r inject -i perf.data --vm-time-correlation=dry-run Starting program: /home/ahunter/bin/perf inject -i perf.data --vm-time-correlation=dry-run [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00007eff8afeef5b in _IO_new_fclose (fp=0x0) at iofclose.c:48 48 iofclose.c: No such file or directory. (gdb) bt #0 0x00007eff8afeef5b in _IO_new_fclose (fp=0x0) at iofclose.c:48 #1 0x0000557fc7b74f92 in perf_data__close (data=data@entry=0x7ffcdafa6578) at util/data.c:376 #2 0x0000557fc7a6b807 in cmd_inject (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at builtin-inject.c:1085 #3 0x0000557fc7ac4783 in run_builtin (p=0x557fc8074878 <commands+600>, argc=4, argv=0x7ffcdafb6a60) at perf.c:313 #4 0x0000557fc7a25d5c in handle_internal_command (argv=<optimized out>, argc=<optimized out>) at perf.c:365 #5 run_argv (argcp=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at perf.c:409 #6 main (argc=4, argv=0x7ffcdafb6a60) at perf.c:539 (gdb) Fixes: 02e6246 ("perf inject: Close inject.output on exit") Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@gmail.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211213084829.114772-2-adrian.hunter@intel.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

marckleinebudde added 2 commits April 26, 2021 20:27

wireless: broadcom: make vendor driver compile out of tree

72aa441

For what it's worth, this patch makes the vendor driver compile out of tree. Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>

marckleinebudde commented Apr 27, 2021

View reviewed changes

marckleinebudde closed this Apr 27, 2021

xypron mentioned this pull request May 3, 2021

drivers/net/wireless/broadcom: fix out of tree build #5

Merged

dtometzki mentioned this pull request Mar 5, 2023

Build custom kernel #82

Open

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Fix broadcom vendor driver#2

Fix broadcom vendor driver#2
marckleinebudde wants to merge 2 commits intostarfive-tech:starfivefrom
marckleinebudde:fix-broadcom-vendor-driver

marckleinebudde commented Apr 26, 2021

Uh oh!

pdp7 commented Apr 26, 2021

Uh oh!

marckleinebudde left a comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Conversation

marckleinebudde commented Apr 26, 2021

Uh oh!

pdp7 commented Apr 26, 2021

Uh oh!

marckleinebudde left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants