wandlowski_1996_structural_10277#53
Conversation
|
|
||
| figure description: #This section will be updated by module `CV` | ||
| version: 1 | ||
| linked measurements: in-situ surface X-ray # FTIR, SXRD, Ring Disc - indicate if any other operando methods were shown in the same plot, which is linked to the data |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"in situ" is usually written without a dash. (No dash in this latin wording)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is surface X-Ray abbreviated as SXRD in the manuscript?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The description was taken from the first sentence of the abstract of that paper (with dash). I am fine with both.
SXRD is single crystal XRD for me, which is different in that case. SXRD is not used in the paper.
How should I change it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
So it seems that the authors write "in situ surface x-ray diffraction" in the introduction and "surface x-ray scattering - SXS" in the manuscript. So probably you should simply change it to SXRD, which is commonly used nowadays.
|
|
||
| figure description: #This section will be updated by module `CV` | ||
| version: 1 | ||
| linked measurements: in-situ surface X-ray # FTIR, SXRD, Ring Disc - indicate if any other operando methods were shown in the same plot, which is linked to the data |
DunklesArchipel
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Aside from a few comments on "in situ" and "SXRD" this is fine.
Co-authored-by: Albert Engstfeld <39313137+DunklesArchipel@users.noreply.github.com>
add lit folder