fix: Drop duplicated received filter update#248
Merged
xdustinface merged 1 commit intov0.41-devfrom Dec 8, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
WalkthroughRemoved the per-height received-filter tracking block from the message handler; the handler still updates overall filter statistics and last-filter-received timestamp but no longer inserts block heights into the shared received-filter-heights set. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (20)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
This fixes an issue introduced in #211 where the `receiver_filter_heights` lock isn't released after inserting the received height, and then the same task tries to acquire the lock again just a bit below in `mark_filter_received` -> deadlock. So, #211 should have not introduced the filter height updates here since they already exist in `mark_filter_received`. Yet the stats updates introduced in the same place are legit.
9521500 to
ccccc6b
Compare
pauldelucia
approved these changes
Dec 8, 2025
pauldelucia
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2025
This fixes an issue introduced in #211 where the `receiver_filter_heights` lock isn't released after inserting the received height, and then the same task tries to acquire the lock again just a bit below in `mark_filter_received` -> deadlock. So, #211 should have not introduced the filter height updates here since they already exist in `mark_filter_received`. Yet the stats updates introduced in the same place are legit.
pauldelucia
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2025
This fixes an issue introduced in #211 where the `receiver_filter_heights` lock isn't released after inserting the received height, and then the same task tries to acquire the lock again just a bit below in `mark_filter_received` -> deadlock. So, #211 should have not introduced the filter height updates here since they already exist in `mark_filter_received`. Yet the stats updates introduced in the same place are legit.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This fixes an issue introduced in #211 where the
receiver_filter_heightslock isn't released after inserting the received height, and then the same task tries to acquire the lock again just a bit below inmark_filter_received-> deadlock.So, #211 should have not introduced the filter height updates here since they already exist in
mark_filter_received. Yet the stats updates introduced in the same place are legit.Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Refactor
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.