Make AggregateFunction take a single argument#445
Closed
Dandandan wants to merge 3 commits intoapache:masterfrom
Closed
Make AggregateFunction take a single argument#445Dandandan wants to merge 3 commits intoapache:masterfrom
Dandandan wants to merge 3 commits intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
unkloud
pushed a commit
to unkloud/datafusion
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2025
…led (apache#445) * improve fallback message when comet native shuffle is not enabled * update test
H0TB0X420
pushed a commit
to H0TB0X420/datafusion
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #444
Rationale for this change
This makes the representation of aggregate functions more correct, makes code dealing with aggregate functions more simple (by not having to assume that the arguments are of length 1 but encode it in the enum).
This came up while working on #441
What changes are included in this PR?
Change type from
Vec<Expr>toBox<Expr>Are there any user-facing changes?
Yes, this is a breaking change to the
Exprenum.