Change container node pool defaults#8967
Conversation
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Breaking Change(s) DetectedThe following breaking change(s) were detected within your pull request.
If you believe this detection to be incorrect please raise the concern with your reviewer. If you intend to make this change you will need to wait for a major release window. An Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are. Terraform GA: Diff ( 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)) |
Tests analyticsTotal tests: Action takenFound 42 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected testsTestAccContainerCluster_withNodeConfigReservationAffinity|TestAccContainerCluster_withConfidentialNodes|TestAccContainerCluster_withILBSubsetting|TestAccContainerNodePool_withHostMaintenancePolicy|TestAccContainerNodePool_withConfidentialNodes|TestAccContainerNodePool_threadsPerCore|TestAccContainerCluster_withSoleTenantGroup|TestAccContainerNodePool_012_ConfigModeAttr|TestAccContainerNodePool_customPlacementPolicy|TestAccContainerCluster_withNodeConfigReservationAffinitySpecific|TestAccContainerNodePool_withSoleTenantConfig|TestAccContainerNodePool_withLinuxNodeConfig|TestAccContainerNodePool_shieldedInstanceConfig|TestAccContainerNodePool_EmptyGuestAccelerator|TestAccContainerNodePool_withNodeConfigScopeAlias|TestAccContainerNodePool_withManagement|TestAccContainerNodePool_withGPU|TestAccContainerNodePool_withMultiNicNetworkConfig|TestAccContainerNodePool_withEnablePrivateNodesToggle|TestAccContainerNodePool_withNodeConfig|TestAccContainerNodePool_withKubeletConfig|TestAccContainerNodePool_withReservationAffinitySpecific|TestAccContainerNodePool_withWorkloadIdentityConfig|TestAccContainerNodePool_withReservationAffinity|TestAccContainerNodePool_withSandboxConfig|TestAccContainerCluster_customPlacementPolicy|TestAccContainerNodePool_gcfsConfig|TestAccContainerNodePool_compactPlacement|TestAccContainerCluster_withNodeConfigShieldedInstanceConfig|TestAccContainerCluster_withNodeConfigScopeAlias|TestAccContainerNodePool_gvnic|TestAccContainerNodePool_ephemeralStorageLocalSsdConfig|TestAccContainerNodePool_localNvmeSsdBlockConfig|TestAccContainerCluster_withNodeConfig|TestAccContainerNodePool_withNetworkConfig|TestAccContainerCluster_withNodePoolDefaults|TestAccContainerCluster_withNodePoolNodeConfig|TestAccContainerNodePool_ephemeralStorageConfig|TestAccContainerCluster_backend|TestAccContainerCluster_withBootDiskKmsKey|TestAccContainerCluster_withSandboxConfig|TestAccContainerCluster_withWorkloadMetadataConfig |
|
Rerun these tests in REPLAYING mode to catch issues
|
e18b441 to
685e573
Compare
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Breaking Change(s) DetectedThe following breaking change(s) were detected within your pull request.
If you believe this detection to be incorrect please raise the concern with your reviewer. If you intend to make this change you will need to wait for a major release window. An Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are. Terraform GA: Diff ( 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)) |
Tests analyticsTotal tests: Action takenFound 2 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected testsTestAccContainerNodePool_withKubeletConfig|TestAccVertexAIIndexEndpoint_updated |
|
|
685e573 to
b1c8ef0
Compare
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Breaking Change(s) DetectedThe following breaking change(s) were detected within your pull request.
If you believe this detection to be incorrect please raise the concern with your reviewer. If you intend to make this change you will need to wait for a major release window. An Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are. Terraform GA: Diff ( 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)) |
Tests analyticsTotal tests: Action takenFound 3 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected testsTestAccAlloydbInstance_createInstanceWithNetworkConfigAndAllocatedIPRange|TestAccContainerNodePool_fastSocket|TestAccVertexAIIndexEndpoint_updated |
|
Rerun these tests in REPLAYING mode to catch issues
|
| "https://www.googleapis.com/auth/logging.write", | ||
| "https://www.googleapis.com/auth/monitoring", | ||
| ] | ||
| logging_variant = "DEFAULT" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I assume we have a bunch of tests where this is not set, so we don't need to add one?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, the majority of tests do not have this set
7bef6de
into
GoogleCloudPlatform:FEATURE-BRANCH-major-release-5.0.0
fixes hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#6236
fixes hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#13706
both auto repair and auto upgrade default to true according to these docs and verified in testing
https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/node-auto-repair
https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/how-to/node-auto-upgrades
upgrade guide: #8969
If this PR is for Terraform, I acknowledge that I have:
make testandmake lintin the generated providers to ensure it passes unit and linter tests.Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)