delete nested tag inside pre tag

[akamefi202]

Added a new rule to htmlToMarkdownRules of expensify-common repo to remove unnecessary nested tags inside <pre> tag.
And updated expensify-common commit hash in package.json.

Details

expensify-common PR
Updated expensify-common dependency to latest commit hash.

Fixed Issues

$ #23659
PROPOSAL: #23659 (comment)

Tests

Web/Desktop

1. Open any report
2. Paste below markdown and send it.(It has a heading, then a code snippet and a quote.)

###test heading
```
Code snippet
```
[link](https://www.example.com/)

3. Now use the copy to clipboard option, and copy the sent message.
4. Paste the message in the composer and send it again.(Notice that there are no difference in both messages.)
5. Now select the sent message text by cursor and press CMD + C.
6. Paste the text in the composer and send the message again.
7. Notice that the markdown message has no difference too.

mWeb Chrome/Safari

1. Open the App and go to any chat.
2. Copy the test text snippet from the issue [HOLD for payment 2023-08-30] [$1000] Web - Markdown pasted from selection-copy is different from clipboard-copy #23659 using the cursor selection.

###test heading
```
Code snippet
```
[link](https://www.example.com/)

3. Paste it to the composer's input.
4. Verify there's no new line under the Code snippet text.

iOS/Android

1. Open the previous chat which is used to test Web/Desktop/mWeb.
2. Copy the text from the app using context menu.
3. Paste the text to the composer's input.
4. Verify pasted text is the same as copied text.

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as above

QA Steps

Same as above

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

• I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
  • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
  • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
  • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
  • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
• I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
  • Android / native
  • Android / Chrome
  • iOS / native
  • iOS / Safari
  • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS / Desktop
• I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
• I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
  • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
  • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
  • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
  • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
  • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
  • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
  • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
• If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
• I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
• I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
• I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
• If a new component is created I verified that:
  • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
  • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
  • The file is named correctly
  • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
  • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
  • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
  • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
  • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
  • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
  • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
• If any new file was added I verified that:
  • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
• If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • A similar style doesn't already exist
  • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
• If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
• If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
• If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
• If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
• I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

We can't reproduce this issue in mobile platforms because it includes copying by keyboard shortcut.

Web

258146529-abf29a55-f9a4-4627-b1e0-3e0696ff8239.mp4

Mobile Web - Chrome

device-2023-08-17-154724.mp4

Mobile Web - Safari

Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.14.Pro.-.2023-08-17.at.15.00.36.mp4

Desktop

Screen.Recording.2023-08-17.at.5.32.23.AM.mp4

iOS

Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.14.Pro.-.2023-08-17.at.14.41.03.mp4

Android

az_recorder_20230817_162739.mp4

[melvin-bot]

@mollfpr Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

[github-actions]

CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅

[akamefi202]

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

[mollfpr]

@akamefi202 Could you complete the records on all platforms?

[mollfpr]

Also, the test should copy-paste the text, not the markdown snippet, right?

[akamefi202]

@mollfpr

Could you complete the records on all platforms?

We can't reproduce this issue in mobile platforms because it includes keyboard shortcut for copying.

Also, the test should copy-paste the text, not the markdown snippet, right?

At first, we need to copy-paste markdown text to send a message. After that, we copy-paste that message by clipboard button & keyboard shortcut for checking difference.

[mollfpr]

Okay, let's clarify the test for native is copy from the context menu. While the others is from the selection copy.

[akamefi202]

@mollfpr Okay. I updated the first comment.

[mollfpr]

Reviewer Checklist

• I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
• I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
  • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
  • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
  • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
• I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
• I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
  • Android / native
  • Android / Chrome
  • iOS / native
  • iOS / Safari
  • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS / Desktop
• If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
• I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
  • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
  • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
  • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
  • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
  • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
  • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
  • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
• If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
• I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
• I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
• If a new component is created I verified that:
  • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
  • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
  • The file is named correctly
  • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
  • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
  • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
  • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
  • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
  • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
• If any new file was added I verified that:
  • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
• If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • A similar style doesn't already exist
  • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
• If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
• If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
• If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
• If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
• I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web

New.Recording.-.8_17_2023.11_33_17.PM.webm

Mobile Web - Chrome

Screen_Recording_20230817_234037_Chrome.mp4

Mobile Web - Safari

Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.14.Pro.-.2023-08-17.at.23.35.24.mp4

Desktop

Screen.Recording.2023-08-17.at.23.36.10.mov

iOS

Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.14.Pro.-.2023-08-17.at.23.34.33.mp4

Android

Screen_Recording_20230817_233913_New.Expensify.Dev.mp4

[mollfpr]

I need to complete the records.

@akamefi202 The test is still doable for the mWeb with the selection copy from the GH issue. So, please complete the records test on all platforms. For the native platforms, please copy the text from the context menu and verify it's pasting correctly.

[akamefi202]

@mollfpr I uploaded recording videos for all platforms.
#24549 (comment)

[mollfpr]

LGTM and tests well 👍

@akamefi202 Could you update the test case to clarify the test on mweb and the native platforms?

Web/Desktop

1. Open the App and go to any chat
2. Copy the test text snippet from the issue #23659 using the cursor selection

test heading

Code snippet

link

3. Paste the text to the composer's input
4. Verify there's no new line under the Code snippet text
5. Send the pasted text from the previous step
6. Copy the text sent with the cursor selection
7. Paste the text to the composer
8. Verify there's no new line under the Code snippet text

mWeb Chrome/Safari

1. Open the App and go to any chat
2. Copy the test text snippet from the issue #23659 using the cursor selection

test heading

Code snippet

link

3. Paste the text to the composer's input
4. Verify there's no new line under the Code snippet text

iOS/Android

1. Open the previous chat use to test Web/Desktop/mWeb
2. Copy the text from the app context menu
3. Paste the text to the composer's input
4. Verify pasted text is the same as copied text

[OSBotify]

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

[akamefi202]

Updated #24549 (comment)

[OSBotify]

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/puneetlath in version: 1.3.56-0 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

[OSBotify]

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 1.3.56-24 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅