docs: clarify ownership and cadence in base image update policy#1130
Merged
utksh1 merged 1 commit intoJun 20, 2026
Merged
Conversation
utksh1
approved these changes
Jun 20, 2026
utksh1
left a comment
Owner
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Focused change with green checks; approving.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Clarifies who owns base-image updates and how often the checks run in
docs/base_image_update_policy.md, verified against the actual CI.CODEOWNERS..github/workflows/trivy-scan.yml), not adocker-image-scanworkflow.0 6 * * 1), and documents the previously-omitted triggers — push/PR that touch the Dockerfiles or dependency manifests, plus manualworkflow_dispatch.Docs-only — no code or behavior change. References spot-checked against
trivy-scan.yml,docker-hardening.yml, and both Dockerfiles;scripts/validate_doc_anchors.pypasses.Related Issues
Closes #869
@utksh1 — please review this PR. If you have any suggestions, please comment below.