parallelise using threads#1
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Owner
|
Hey @nkanaev, this is wonderful, thank you! More than happy to merge, and I'll give credit in the README. I'll update the MHz for my machine (yours is faster than mine) so that it's consistent with the single-threaded case. Thanks again. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi
I wanted to say that's a great work you've done porting the original implementation to the new hardware. That truly is impressive.
I've made a small tweak to parallelize the workload across multiple threads that speeds up the computation significantly. I just wanted to share with you, feel free to close the PR if you don't like it.
Before:
After: