Add support for adding and dropping linux capabilities to/from containers.#4060
Closed
albers wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Add support for adding and dropping linux capabilities to/from containers.#4060albers wants to merge 1 commit into
albers wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Harald Albers <github@albersweb.de>
Member
|
Hi @albers, This looks like a very niche functionality to me, and given that we provide WDYT? |
Author
|
@bsideup I agree. I did not find |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Creating containers with adjusted capabilities is a more secure alternative to using privileged mode.
I have a use case that forces me to use privileged mode instead of just adding one missing capability.
I feel testcontainers should support capabilities.
I placed the new code below the privileged mode pieces because they are functionally related.
In implementig, I followed #725, which added support for container labels.