Inconsistent `.deb` MUSL package names

[balupton]

The assets for bat 0.26 are as follows:

• bat-musl_0.26.0_arm64.deb
• bat-musl_0.26.0_musl-linux-amd64.deb
• bat-musl_0.26.0_musl-linux-i686.deb
• bat-v0.26.0-aarch64-apple-darwin.tar.gz
• bat-v0.26.0-aarch64-pc-windows-msvc.zip
• bat-v0.26.0-aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.gz
• bat-v0.26.0-aarch64-unknown-linux-musl.tar.gz
• bat-v0.26.0-arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf.tar.gz
• bat-v0.26.0-arm-unknown-linux-musleabihf.tar.gz
• bat-v0.26.0-i686-pc-windows-msvc.zip
• bat-v0.26.0-i686-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.gz
• bat-v0.26.0-i686-unknown-linux-musl.tar.gz
• bat-v0.26.0-x86_64-apple-darwin.tar.gz
• bat-v0.26.0-x86_64-pc-windows-msvc.zip
• bat-v0.26.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.tar.gz
• bat-v0.26.0-x86_64-unknown-linux-musl.tar.gz
• bat_0.26.0_amd64.deb
• bat_0.26.0_arm64.deb
• bat_0.26.0_armhf.deb
• bat_0.26.0_i686.deb
• bat_0.26.0_musl-linux-armhf.deb

Of which, the .deb of those are as follows:

• bat-musl_0.26.0_arm64.deb
• bat-musl_0.26.0_musl-linux-amd64.deb
• bat-musl_0.26.0_musl-linux-i686.deb
• bat_0.26.0_amd64.deb
• bat_0.26.0_arm64.deb
• bat_0.26.0_armhf.deb
• bat_0.26.0_i686.deb
• bat_0.26.0_musl-linux-armhf.deb

First. There are three layers of consistency here:

• bat-musl_0.26.0_arm64.deb
• bat-musl_0.26.0_musl-linux-amd64.deb
• bat-musl_0.26.0_musl-linux-i686.deb

have a different prefix, whereas all the others do not, including the other MUSL deb asset of:

• bat_0.26.0_musl-linux-armhf.deb

Second. The .tar.gz and .zip assets all have GNU or MUSL or MSVC as the last sufufix, whereas the deb builds either don't have such a suffix at all:

• bat_0.26.0_amd64.deb
• bat_0.26.0_arm64.deb
• bat_0.26.0_armhf.deb
• bat_0.26.0_i686.deb

Or have it as a prefix before the version number:

• bat-musl_0.26.0_arm64.deb

Or have it as a prefix after the version number:

• bat_0.26.0_musl-linux-armhf.deb

Or have have it as both a prefix before and after the version number:

• bat-musl_0.26.0_musl-linux-amd64.deb
• bat-musl_0.26.0_musl-linux-i686.deb

It would be nice if their naming conventions were consistent, e.g.

• bat-0.26.0_musl-linux-arm64.deb
• bat-0.26.0_musl-linux-amd64.deb
• bat-0.26.0_musl-linux-i686.deb
• bat_0.26.0_amd64.deb
• bat_0.26.0_arm64.deb
• bat_0.26.0_armhf.deb
• bat_0.26.0_i686.deb
• bat_0.26.0_musl-linux-armhf.deb

And it would be even better if they were consistent with the .tar.gz and zip options.

This will make it easier for https://github.com/bevry/dorothy/blob/master/commands/setup-util-bat to determine the correct asset for the platform, as it will only need to contend with suffixes instead of prefixes and suffixes.

[keith-hall]

it seems to me that these are named automatically by the cross build action... https://github.com/sharkdp/bat/blob/master/.github/workflows/CICD.yml#L219-L237 probably it will be necessary to read the docs and work out how to change the output binary naming