Skip to content

update contentType to be optional - #66

Merged
s-heppner merged 5 commits into
update/Metamodel_V3.1.2from
update/Metamodel_V3.1.2_optional_contentType
Feb 25, 2026
Merged

update contentType to be optional#66
s-heppner merged 5 commits into
update/Metamodel_V3.1.2from
update/Metamodel_V3.1.2_optional_contentType

Conversation

@Frosty2500

@Frosty2500 Frosty2500 commented Dec 1, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

See here for the change to contentType.

@s-heppner s-heppner left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does this affect the serialization in any way?

@Frosty2500

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Does this affect the serialization in any way?

Yes it does, serialization is now appropriately adapted.

@ZANDx1
ZANDx1 force-pushed the update/Metamodel_V3.1.2_optional_contentType branch from 96d41ea to 1ff1dbd Compare February 2, 2026 12:54
@s-heppner

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ZANDx1, could you have a look at the XML serialization as well, for this?

@s-heppner
s-heppner merged commit 738337e into update/Metamodel_V3.1.2 Feb 25, 2026
28 checks passed
@s-heppner
s-heppner deleted the update/Metamodel_V3.1.2_optional_contentType branch February 25, 2026 08:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants