In #166 I've added some architecture intrinsics (e.g. the cpuid intrinsic) to a misc module in x86.
Our internal module names are private and do not affect users, but IMO the name misc is pretty bad and we should group these intrinsics in a more consistent way.
We could name those modules .../i386/i486/i586/i686/... instead.
The main issue I have with this is that, for example, detecting i686 using target feature leads to:
if cfg!(all(target_arch = "x86", not(target_feature = "sse2"))) {
}is IMO a bit messy.
In #166 I've added some architecture intrinsics (e.g. the
cpuidintrinsic) to amiscmodule inx86.Our internal module names are private and do not affect users, but IMO the name
miscis pretty bad and we should group these intrinsics in a more consistent way.We could name those modules .../
i386/i486/i586/i686/... instead.The main issue I have with this is that, for example, detecting
i686using target feature leads to:is IMO a bit messy.