Add implementation of Extend for () by cramertj · Pull Request #50234 · rust-lang/rust

cramertj · 2018-04-25T22:07:04Z

This is useful in some generic code which wants to collect iterators of items into a result.

rust-highfive · 2018-04-25T22:07:07Z

r? @Kimundi

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

emilyalbini · 2018-04-30T11:31:53Z

Ping from triage @Kimundi! This PR needs your review.

Kimundi · 2018-04-30T11:47:27Z

@rfcbot fcp merge

kennytm · 2018-05-01T20:09:27Z

@rust-lang/libs Please summon rfcbot again, thanks.

alexcrichton · 2018-05-01T21:05:40Z

@rfcbot fcp merge

rfcbot · 2018-05-01T21:05:40Z

Team member @alexcrichton has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged teams:

No concerns currently listed.

Once a majority of reviewers approve (and none object), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me.

withoutboats · 2018-05-02T07:40:39Z

This is useful in some generic code which wants to collect iterators of items into a result.

Could you show an example?

cramertj · 2018-05-02T17:03:49Z

@withoutboats The specific case where I hit this was wanting to StreamExt::collect a stream into () so that all the elements will be evaluated and an error will be returned if any of them failed.

sfackler · 2018-05-02T17:32:49Z

I believe iter.for_each(drop) can be faster for some iterators like chain.

Huh, interesting.

rfcbot · 2018-05-04T04:23:39Z

🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔

kennytm · 2018-05-08T21:13:22Z

This should become 1.28.0.

rfcbot · 2018-05-14T04:45:33Z

The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete.

alexcrichton · 2018-05-14T13:51:12Z

@bors: r+

bors · 2018-05-14T13:51:14Z

📌 Commit 5028b9c has been approved by alexcrichton

alexcrichton · 2018-05-14T13:51:21Z

@bors: r-

er oops, mind updating the stability attribute?

alexcrichton · 2018-05-14T13:51:38Z

Also while you're at it, mind adding a small test?

kennytm · 2018-05-20T07:03:27Z

@bors r=alexcrichton rollup

bors · 2018-05-20T07:03:28Z

📌 Commit a74e168 has been approved by alexcrichton

bors · 2018-05-20T20:29:17Z

⌛ Testing commit a74e168 with merge a1d4a95...

Add implementation of Extend for () This is useful in some generic code which wants to collect iterators of items into a result.

bors · 2018-05-20T22:37:01Z

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: alexcrichton
Pushing a1d4a95 to master...

Mirrors rust-lang/rust#50234

683: impl ParallelExtend<()> for () r=cuviper a=cuviper Mirrors rust-lang/rust#50234 Co-authored-by: Josh Stone <cuviper@gmail.com>

rust-highfive assigned Kimundi Apr 25, 2018

rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 25, 2018

cramertj force-pushed the extend branch from d039bfe to cf475cc Compare April 25, 2018 22:26

rust-lang deleted a comment from rust-highfive Apr 25, 2018

cramertj force-pushed the extend branch from cf475cc to d736ca7 Compare April 25, 2018 22:37

kennytm added the T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label May 1, 2018

kennytm added S-waiting-on-team relnotes Marks issues that should be documented in the release notes of the next release. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 1, 2018

rfcbot added proposed-final-comment-period Proposed to merge/close by relevant subteam, see T-<team> label. Will enter FCP once signed off. disposition-merge This issue / PR is in PFCP or FCP with a disposition to merge it. labels May 1, 2018

sfackler reviewed May 2, 2018

View reviewed changes

cramertj force-pushed the extend branch from d736ca7 to 3a0a67f Compare May 2, 2018 17:46

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

cramertj force-pushed the extend branch from 3a0a67f to 5028b9c Compare May 2, 2018 17:55

rfcbot added final-comment-period In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised. and removed proposed-final-comment-period Proposed to merge/close by relevant subteam, see T-<team> label. Will enter FCP once signed off. labels May 4, 2018

kennytm reviewed May 8, 2018

View reviewed changes

Comment thread src/libcore/iter/traits.rs Outdated

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Member

kennytm May 8, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should become 1.28.0.

rfcbot added the finished-final-comment-period The final comment period is finished for this PR / Issue. label May 14, 2018

rfcbot removed the final-comment-period In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised. label May 14, 2018

kennytm added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-team labels May 14, 2018

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 14, 2018

bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels May 14, 2018

cramertj force-pushed the extend branch from 5028b9c to 3851a87 Compare May 14, 2018 18:38

Add implementation of Extend for ()

a74e168

cramertj force-pushed the extend branch from 3851a87 to a74e168 Compare May 14, 2018 18:50

kennytm added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels May 20, 2018

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 20, 2018

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2018

Auto merge of #50234 - cramertj:extend, r=alexcrichton

a1d4a95

Add implementation of Extend for () This is useful in some generic code which wants to collect iterators of items into a result.

bors merged commit a74e168 into rust-lang:master May 20, 2018

cramertj deleted the extend branch May 21, 2018 20:02

cuviper added a commit to cuviper/rayon that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2019

impl ParallelExtend<()> for ()

c6a294b

Mirrors rust-lang/rust#50234

cuviper mentioned this pull request Aug 15, 2019

impl ParallelExtend<()> for () rayon-rs/rayon#683

Merged

bors Bot added a commit to rayon-rs/rayon that referenced this pull request Aug 22, 2019

Merge #683

d993d7a

683: impl ParallelExtend<()> for () r=cuviper a=cuviper Mirrors rust-lang/rust#50234 Co-authored-by: Josh Stone <cuviper@gmail.com>

ibraheemdev mentioned this pull request Feb 19, 2022

Enable draining iterator/stream elements into a () #94166

Closed

Uh oh!

Conversation

cramertj commented Apr 25, 2018

Uh oh!

rust-highfive commented Apr 25, 2018

Uh oh!

emilyalbini commented Apr 30, 2018

Uh oh!

Kimundi commented Apr 30, 2018

Uh oh!

kennytm commented May 1, 2018

Uh oh!

alexcrichton commented May 1, 2018

Uh oh!

rfcbot commented May 1, 2018 • edited by dtolnay Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

withoutboats commented May 2, 2018

Uh oh!

cramertj commented May 2, 2018

Uh oh!

sfackler May 2, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

cramertj May 2, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

rfcbot commented May 4, 2018

Uh oh!

kennytm May 8, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

rfcbot commented May 14, 2018

Uh oh!

alexcrichton commented May 14, 2018

Uh oh!

bors commented May 14, 2018

Uh oh!

alexcrichton commented May 14, 2018

Uh oh!

alexcrichton commented May 14, 2018

Uh oh!

kennytm commented May 20, 2018

Uh oh!

bors commented May 20, 2018

Uh oh!

bors commented May 20, 2018

Uh oh!

bors commented May 20, 2018

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

10 participants

rfcbot commented May 1, 2018 •

edited by dtolnay

Loading