Skip to content

Conversation

@zetanumbers
Copy link
Contributor

@zetanumbers zetanumbers commented Dec 12, 2025

A simple check in case compiler tries to encode a dep node twice like in #141540.

Also if we'd try to mark a red node as green as it may then create a bad DepNodeIndex like in #148295.

If it prevents #141540 from emitting a faulty dep-graph.bin file via panic then it means you will be able to temporarily fix it by simply restarting cargo or rust-analyzer without cleaning up incremental cache.

@rustbot rustbot added A-query-system Area: The rustc query system (https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/query.html) S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 12, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 12, 2025

r? @jdonszelmann

rustbot has assigned @jdonszelmann.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@zetanumbers
Copy link
Contributor Author

r? @petrochenkov

@rustbot rustbot assigned petrochenkov and unassigned jdonszelmann Dec 12, 2025
@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

r=me once CI is green

@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2025
Add a sanity check in case of any duplicate nodes
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Dec 12, 2025
@rust-bors
Copy link

rust-bors bot commented Dec 12, 2025

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 932e85d (932e85dab518166acc3fda1566172a48baad44d2, parent: 2a3a62d26e9e5badb806ac6a43bb307ff472b514)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (932e85d): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -2.7%, secondary -4.9%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.7% [-2.7%, -2.7%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-4.9% [-4.9%, -4.9%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) -2.7% [-2.7%, -2.7%] 1

Cycles

Results (secondary -3.4%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.4% [-4.8%, -2.1%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 472.42s -> 471.934s (-0.10%)
Artifact size: 389.33 MiB -> 389.34 MiB (0.00%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Dec 12, 2025
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

oh interesting, I did not expect this :o

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+ rollup
(The perf diff is clearly noise.)

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 12, 2025

📌 Commit c7b5fb5 has been approved by petrochenkov

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 12, 2025
jhpratt added a commit to jhpratt/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2025
…petrochenkov

Add a sanity check in case of any duplicate nodes

A simple check in case compiler tries to encode a dep node twice like in rust-lang#141540.

Also if we'd try to mark a red node as green as it may then create a bad `DepNodeIndex` like in rust-lang#148295.

If it prevents rust-lang#141540 from emitting a faulty `dep-graph.bin` file via panic then it means you will be able to temporarily fix it by simply restarting cargo or rust-analyzer without cleaning up incremental cache.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2025
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #145278 (Update `rustc_codegen_gcc` rotate operation document)
 - #148825 (Add SystemTime::{MIN, MAX})
 - #148837 (Use `let...else` instead of `match foo { ... _ => return };` and `if let ... else return`)
 - #149177 (Add proper suggestion for associated function with unknown field)
 - #149843 (Inherit attributes in delegation)
 - #149860 (Fix: Prevent macro-expanded extern crates from shadowing extern arguments)
 - #149874 (Weak for Arc pointer is marked as DynSend/DynSync)
 - #149903 (Remove unused code in `cfg_old`)
 - #149911 (bootstrap: Don't pass an unused `--color` to compiletest)
 - #149916 (Add a sanity check in case of any duplicate nodes)
 - #149924 (`declare_lint_pass` for `INLINE_ALWAYS_MISMATCHING_TARGET_FEATURES`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
jhpratt added a commit to jhpratt/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2025
…petrochenkov

Add a sanity check in case of any duplicate nodes

A simple check in case compiler tries to encode a dep node twice like in rust-lang#141540.

Also if we'd try to mark a red node as green as it may then create a bad `DepNodeIndex` like in rust-lang#148295.

If it prevents rust-lang#141540 from emitting a faulty `dep-graph.bin` file via panic then it means you will be able to temporarily fix it by simply restarting cargo or rust-analyzer without cleaning up incremental cache.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2025
Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #145278 (Update `rustc_codegen_gcc` rotate operation document)
 - #148837 (Use `let...else` instead of `match foo { ... _ => return };` and `if let ... else return`)
 - #149177 (Add proper suggestion for associated function with unknown field)
 - #149843 (Inherit attributes in delegation)
 - #149860 (Fix: Prevent macro-expanded extern crates from shadowing extern arguments)
 - #149874 (Weak for Arc pointer is marked as DynSend/DynSync)
 - #149903 (Remove unused code in `cfg_old`)
 - #149911 (bootstrap: Don't pass an unused `--color` to compiletest)
 - #149916 (Add a sanity check in case of any duplicate nodes)
 - #149924 (`declare_lint_pass` for `INLINE_ALWAYS_MISMATCHING_TARGET_FEATURES`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-query-system Area: The rustc query system (https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/query.html) S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants