-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.1k
#73905 regressed several tests around associated type defaults #78049
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
A-associated-itemsArea: Associated items (types, constants & functions)Area: Associated items (types, constants & functions)C-bugCategory: This is a bug.Category: This is a bug.F-associated_type_defaults`#![feature(associated_type_defaults)]``#![feature(associated_type_defaults)]`T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Description
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
A-associated-itemsArea: Associated items (types, constants & functions)Area: Associated items (types, constants & functions)C-bugCategory: This is a bug.Category: This is a bug.F-associated_type_defaults`#![feature(associated_type_defaults)]``#![feature(associated_type_defaults)]`T-compilerRelevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
It seems that several test regression got ignored in #73905:
default types no longer needs to be wfWhile some of the other changes are acceptable, I think the changes listed above doesn't really get justified and seems to be a regression.
cc @matthewjasper