If this bug affects you, please see the workaround here: #44704 (comment)
The current stable and beta docs are missing a single javascript file, store.js.
Stable rust builds with mdbook=0.0.22 In 0.0.23, mdbook introduced a new javascript file, store.js. The Book second edition uses a custom template in order to display the "this is a draft" banner, and so, we updated it to include the new file rust-lang/book#783. However, this was wrong; it shouldn't have been done until mdbook was updated in the main repository. As such, things are now very broken:
As nightly has updated mdbook, this has been fixed, but having the main way of learning Rust broken for ~10 weeks isn't great.
For stable
We could fix the online docs by just uploading store.js to the appropriate place. I am normally very against changing what we distribute after the fact, but simply adding a file seems very minimal.
While this regression is in some sense very serious, I don't think it's worth cutting a new stable for, with this workaround.
For beta
In my opinion, we should send in a backport fix to beta. This involves upgrading mdbook on beta.
Tagging as "regression from stable to nightly" even though it's been fixed in nightly; this is about what to do for stable and beta. Tagging @rust-lang/infra for the stable fix, tagging @rust-lang/docs for the beta fix.
If this bug affects you, please see the workaround here: #44704 (comment)
The current stable and beta docs are missing a single javascript file,
store.js.Stable rust builds with
mdbook=0.0.22In0.0.23,mdbookintroduced a new javascript file,store.js. The Book second edition uses a custom template in order to display the "this is a draft" banner, and so, we updated it to include the new file rust-lang/book#783. However, this was wrong; it shouldn't have been done untilmdbookwas updated in the main repository. As such, things are now very broken:As nightly has updated
mdbook, this has been fixed, but having the main way of learning Rust broken for ~10 weeks isn't great.For stable
We could fix the online docs by just uploading
store.jsto the appropriate place. I am normally very against changing what we distribute after the fact, but simply adding a file seems very minimal.While this regression is in some sense very serious, I don't think it's worth cutting a new stable for, with this workaround.
For beta
In my opinion, we should send in a backport fix to beta. This involves upgrading mdbook on beta.
Tagging as "regression from stable to nightly" even though it's been fixed in nightly; this is about what to do for stable and beta. Tagging @rust-lang/infra for the stable fix, tagging @rust-lang/docs for the beta fix.