-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.9k
rustdoc: Don't distinguish structs and tuple structs with only private fields #38101
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
C-feature-requestCategory: A feature request, i.e: not implemented / a PR.Category: A feature request, i.e: not implemented / a PR.E-mediumCall for participation: Medium difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Intermediate.Call for participation: Medium difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Intermediate.T-rustdocRelevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
C-feature-requestCategory: A feature request, i.e: not implemented / a PR.Category: A feature request, i.e: not implemented / a PR.E-mediumCall for participation: Medium difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Intermediate.Call for participation: Medium difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Intermediate.T-rustdocRelevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Type
Fields
Give feedbackNo fields configured for issues without a type.
For example,
AddrParseErrorshows up aspub struct AddrParseError(_);andIpv4Addrshows up aspub struct Ipv4Addr { /* fields omitted */ }I feel like all structs should show up as the latter form if all of the fields are private. It technically doesn't matter that the struct is a tuple struct if the fields are all private. It's not a huge deal but it's an inconsistency that looks off to me.