Currently the reference does not document the grammar for types. This is relevant for precedence of operators, e.g. how &(Foo + Sized) must be written rather than &Foo + Sized.
A type grammar is present in RFC 0438, but I don't know if it's up to date.
Currently the reference does not document the grammar for types. This is relevant for precedence of operators, e.g. how
&(Foo + Sized)must be written rather than&Foo + Sized.A type grammar is present in RFC 0438, but I don't know if it's up to date.