added support booleans in records for in parameters #50
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
Any reason for not merging it? |
Collaborator
|
We need to add some tests for that change. I'm also curious about how things work with Oracle 12c in which support for BOOLEAN PL/SQL bind variables has been added. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi Raimonds,
we have just started using ruby-plsql-spec as testing tool for our big plsql-based application. Since we are using records and objects massively we added support for booleans in record in parameters. As soon as I get the spec running I will add specs too (the database, environment settings in the spec are a bit special).
We will add missing support for other types as we stumble upon them (as far as ruby-oci8 supports it).
Regards,
Beate