Documentation: Add page about enumerating use cases #487
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
|
This is lovely, thank you. If other people emerge with more uses, we can clarify attribution and such, but it's good to get this out straight away. |
Member
|
The readthedocs config is also out of date, so this is not yet reflected in the doc pages. It should not be hard to fix. |
Contributor
Author
|
I can have a look. Can you enable the pull request builder in the RTD console, so we can also have previews via CI, and at the same time see if relevant patches are valid on behalf of the PR itself? |
Member
|
I think I enabled it |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@martindurant: At #485 (comment), you asked:
I think it would be nice to also have use cases on the documentation, so I am trying to make a start hereby in the hope you will like it.
@dwskoog: I've added your response from #485 (comment) 1:1 to this patch. Let me know if you would like to see some adjustments before possibly being published, depending on Martin's verdict.