start to update the examples for Purescript 0.9.3, closes #11#12
Open
danse wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Owner
|
I wasn't able to reproduce your warning/error counts so I tried shuffling the deck a bit. On top of your branch I upgraded the Then I get these warnings and errors: Can you reproduce that? |
Author
|
Hey, thanks for taking the time to look into this! Yes, we are on the same page. I get exactly the same warnings and the same error at the end. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello, this is mostly to discuss the changes with you in order to be faster. I tried to build with Purescript 0.9.3 and i've got a failure, 4 errors and 19 warnings.
The failure was due to the
ffioption passed to the compiler, it's not supported anymore. I removed it but i guess that this is not a solution. At the moment i couldn't find any documentation about how to specify the Javascript files to include. Maybe now the compiler is able to find the files automatically?About the rest, i fixed the easy errors due to the changes in the prelude. I still have a more complex type checker error in the force layout example, which i need to look again with more calm. In the meantime i wanted to reach out in order to get some feedback about the general direction, since i see that the repo hasn't had commits in a while.
Cheers,
Francesco