-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 383
feat(TreeView): allow selection without expansion #7714
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0801291
feat(TreeView): allow selection without expansion
kmcfaul e5edf32
update structure, remove extra button from example
kmcfaul 11d4d58
further html updates
kmcfaul 9ae280a
update structure
kmcfaul b6c4d2c
add id to toggle button
kmcfaul dbbb826
apply id only to selectable nodes and update test
kmcfaul 42bbd4f
fix duplicate ids
kmcfaul bae969f
match checkbox aria
kmcfaul 6af83a2
update snap
kmcfaul e5773f9
remove htmlfor from selectable nodes
kmcfaul f05e46d
pr feedback
kmcfaul 32f881f
rename node prop
kmcfaul File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nitpick that I wouldn't block over:
isSelectablecould be an alternative prop name, as it would also align with our Card and Table selectable variants that have a similar prop.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah the prop name is something I wasn't too sure on. I thought about
isSelectablebut wasn't sure if it would be clear that it would make the nodes selectable opposed to the whole tree. I'm open to either prop name if anyone feels strongly one way or the other.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah that's a fair point. I might think that having selectable items would make the tree view selectable in nature, but I do see how it isn't exactly clear. How do you feel about the idea of
TreeViewwith prophasSelectableNodes, and theTreeViewListItemwith propisSelectable?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like that, will update