Add CSV spec descriptors

[lpiwowar]

Add operator-sdk CSV annotations to OpenStackLightspeed spec fields to generate proper spec descriptors in the ClusterServiceVersion manifests. This ensures the operator passes scorecard tests [1] (olm-spec-descriptors-test test).

[1] https://sdk.operatorframework.io/docs/testing-operators/scorecard/

Before the fix

$ operator-sdk scorecard ./bundle
...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Image:      quay.io/operator-framework/scorecard-test:v1.38.0
Entrypoint: [scorecard-test olm-spec-descriptors]
Labels:
	"suite":"olm"
	"test":"olm-spec-descriptors-test"
Results:
	Name: olm-spec-descriptors
	State: fail

	Suggestions:
		Add a spec descriptor for llmCredentials
		Add a spec descriptor for llmEndpoint
		Add a spec descriptor for modelName
		Add a spec descriptor for tlsCACertBundle
	Errors:
		llmCredentials does not have a spec descriptor
		llmEndpoint does not have a spec descriptor
		modelName does not have a spec descriptor
		tlsCACertBundle does not have a spec descriptor
	Log:
		Loaded ClusterServiceVersion: openstack-lightspeed-operator.v0.0.1
		Loaded 1 Custom Resources from alm-examples
...

Note

It is recommended to run these tests as part of the community-operators pipeline. If we do not fix this then these tests will fail.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lpiwowar

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [lpiwowar]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[softwarefactory-project-zuul]

Merge Failed.

This change or one of its cross-repo dependencies was unable to be automatically merged with the current state of its repository. Please rebase the change and upload a new patchset.
Warning:
Error merging github.com/openstack-lightspeed/operator for 89,021316cd0033085cda073e7dcd5831689e3f1422

[umago]

Thanks! I think it looks good, I left a suggestion for the llmCredentials configuration description.

[umago]

Nit (non-blocking): The second part of the sentence sounds a bit off, may I suggest:

The secret must include a field named "apitoken" containing token value

[umago]

or

The secret must contain a field named "apitoken" which holds the token value

(A bit more similar to the original)

[umago]

/lgtm