Adding Vishnu Kannan as a Maintainer.#223
Conversation
|
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 03:53:00PM -0700, Vish Kannan wrote:
I think they're there because they're listed in the draft charter [1](although that's not mentioned explicitly in #131). See also my |
|
This PR was requested by @crosbymichael. |
|
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 04:06:58PM -0700, Vish Kannan wrote:
He proposed #131 too, so he can likely clarify why his reasoning |
|
Woot, what's up with travis? |
|
@wking we know why they were there. They have decided to step down because they don't have the time to devote to maintaining OCI because of other responsibilities. |
|
@vishh |
Signed-off-by: Vishnu kannan <vishnuk@google.com>
|
Trimmed down the subject. |
|
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 05:39:05PM -0700, Michael Crosby wrote:
Thanks for clarifing :). Probably update opencontainers/web and |
|
Sad to see them have to go 😢 LGTM |
|
LGTM and goodbye 😢 We are still watching you, though! |
|
LGTM |
Adding Vishnu Kannan as a Maintainer.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmm, is this actually the right GitHub ID? I expect it to be @vishh, not vishnuk (who doesn't seem to have any public activity).
Removing Victor Marmol and Rohit Jnagal from being Maintainers.
Signed-off-by: Vishnu kannan vishnuk@google.com
cc @crosbymichael @vmarmol @rjnagal