Skip to content

fix: safely backfill legacy signed npm releases - #166

Merged
mldangelo-oai merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
mdangelo/codex/backfill-legacy-release-provenance-20260730
Jul 31, 2026
Merged

fix: safely backfill legacy signed npm releases#166
mldangelo-oai merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
mdangelo/codex/backfill-legacy-release-provenance-20260730

Conversation

@mldangelo-oai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Backfills the two immutable historical npm releases whose public registry metadata predates gitHead publication. The GitHub-release workflow now verifies the exact SLSA attestation, protected publishing run, repository, release tag, source commit, and tarball bytes before accepting missing gitHead for 0.1.0 or 0.1.1 only. All later releases continue failing closed when gitHead is missing; mismatched metadata is always rejected. Validation: 176 release automation tests passing, TypeScript typecheck, Prettier, and successful live verification of the real protected 0.1.0 and 0.1.1 release artifacts and npm provenance.

@mldangelo-oai

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@codex review

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 31, 2026
@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Already looking forward to the next diff.

Reviewed commit: 7b799a0fef

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Security review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 7b799a0fef

View security finding report

Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex.

ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHub

This is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:

  • You comment "@codex security review"
  • A regular code review gets triggered (for example, "@codex review" or when a PR is opened), and you’re opted in so security review runs alongside code review

Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found.

@mldangelo-oai
mldangelo-oai merged commit be60e8f into main Jul 31, 2026
16 checks passed
@mldangelo-oai
mldangelo-oai deleted the mdangelo/codex/backfill-legacy-release-provenance-20260730 branch July 31, 2026 00:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants