Skip to content

Conversation

@nschonni
Copy link
Member

@nschonni nschonni commented Sep 4, 2019

This should be OK with nodejs/node#29352, but I'm not sure if there are other affected repos that might also need to be checked/fixed before this can land

index.js Outdated
[require("remark-lint-strong-marker"), "*"],
[require("remark-lint-table-cell-padding"), "padded"]
[require("remark-lint-table-cell-padding"), "padded"],
[require("remark-lint-no-consecutive-blank-lines")]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the rules are all in alphabetical order. Can you move this to where it belongs alphabetically?

(Probably makes sense to add a comment about this. Feel free to do that too if you want.)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does't look like they were totally sorted, but it makes sense so I did that in a separate commit

Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, although I'd prefer the rule moved in the list to be alphabetical.

@nschonni nschonni force-pushed the remark-lint-no-consecutive-blank-lines branch from cb0648f to 83fca26 Compare September 5, 2019 02:42
@Trott Trott merged commit 86bcc3e into nodejs:master Sep 5, 2019
@nschonni nschonni deleted the remark-lint-no-consecutive-blank-lines branch September 5, 2019 13:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants