This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 28, 2025. It is now read-only.
Add poweron architecture ppc64le to travis build#1
Open
asellappen wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Author
|
Pls help to review and approve |
Author
|
any update on this pls |
1 similar comment
Author
|
any update on this pls |
Owner
|
I'm so sorry, I had notifications muted here and completely missed this. Is this still needed at this stage? I'm very aware 5y have gone by. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is part of the Ubuntu distribution for ppc64le. This helps us simplify testing later when distributions are re-building and re-releasing,For more info tag @gerrith3.
We typically build applications for customers and ISVs, and while we don't use this package directly, we do count on all of the packages in debian/ubuntu to build other packages. So we more likely have this as a second or third level dependency and couldn't tell you explicitly which features we use or our usage model.