Skip to content

v2 with userInfo#4600

Open
tobiasKaminsky wants to merge 2 commits intov2withActivityfrom
v2
Open

v2 with userInfo#4600
tobiasKaminsky wants to merge 2 commits intov2withActivityfrom
v2

Conversation

@tobiasKaminsky
Copy link
Member

@tobiasKaminsky tobiasKaminsky commented Oct 2, 2019

This extends #4900 and uses new GetUserInfoRemoteOperation

  • merge it only once we have other remoteOperation transferred and are more confident about working client

@nextcloud-android-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

APK file: https://www.kaminsky.me/nc-dev/android-artifacts/11087.apk

qrcode

To test this change/fix you can simply download above APK file and install and test it in parallel to your existing Nextcloud app.

@nextcloud-android-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nextcloud-android-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Codacy

432

Lint

TypemasterPR
Warnings5959
Errors00

SpotBugs (new)

Warning TypeNumber
Bad practice Warnings27
Correctness Warnings69
Internationalization Warnings12
Malicious code vulnerability Warnings4
Multithreaded correctness Warnings9
Performance Warnings120
Security Warnings47
Dodgy code Warnings139
Total427

SpotBugs (master)

Warning TypeNumber
Bad practice Warnings27
Correctness Warnings69
Internationalization Warnings12
Malicious code vulnerability Warnings4
Multithreaded correctness Warnings9
Performance Warnings120
Security Warnings47
Dodgy code Warnings139
Total427

Android-library is not set to master branch in build.gradle

Signed-off-by: tobiasKaminsky <tobias@kaminsky.me>
Signed-off-by: tobiasKaminsky <tobias@kaminsky.me>
@tobiasKaminsky tobiasKaminsky changed the title Initial support for v2 library v2 with userInfo Nov 29, 2019
@tobiasKaminsky tobiasKaminsky changed the base branch from master to v2withActivity November 29, 2019 09:22
* Call {@link RemoteOperationResult#getData()}.get(0) to get it.
*/
@Override
@Deprecated
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If it is deprecated it should still work, so this just leads to an exception at runtime, so removing the method (leading to a compiler error) would be preferable imho.

What do you think @ezaquarii ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants