Conversation
…-candidate 2020-04-01
|
@skliper I think the deprecated |
|
See the comment on nasa/osal#396 This won't compile with deprecated removed until nasa/cFE#456 gets resolved |
|
@skliper I made two commits in my cFE fork that I think fix this but I worry that it might break something else: |
|
Note that the pull request for nasa/cFE#456 is now submitted in nasa/cFE#595, and this will cause a merge conflict with the Should be an easy rebase though, so if you do put this in let me know so I can rebase the pull request. |
I think a better option is to fast-track nasa/cFE#595 and merge that instead @skliper thoughts? |
|
I'm all for moving nasa/cFE#595 forward. I already approved. |
|
I've got another pull request that I'm just about to submit for 295/480 which depends on 595, so if you decide to include nasa/cFE#595, then let me know as soon as the integration candidate is ready so I can rebase to it. |
…CATED compatibility
cFE - 6.7.12 osal - 5.0.11 psp - 1.4.8 cFS-GroundSystem - 2.1.6
@jphickey, I just merged the IC. |
Describe the contribution
Integration Candidate
Integrates:
Testing performed
Bundle CI - https://travis-ci.com/github/nasa/cFS/builds/159710339
Expected behavior changes
See PRs
System(s) tested on
Bundle CI - Ubuntu:Bionic
Contributor Info - All information REQUIRED for consideration of pull request
Gerardo E. Cruz-Ortiz, NASA-GSFC