CommonMark blockquote example 221 fails

[zq1997]

According to commonmark spec

It is a consequence of the Laziness rule that any number of initial >s may be omitted on a continuation line of a nested block quote:

>>> foo
> bar
>>> baz

should be render to (By spec.commonmark.org and github comment system)

<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>foo
bar
baz</p>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>

but current implemention gives:

<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>foo
bar</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p>baz</p>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>

[puzrin]

Thank you for report. We test CM spec automatically. Need to check why this sample was missed.

[ocavue]

The example in the origin issue is not the example 221 in CM.

The example 221 is:

>>> foo
> bar
>>baz

Notice that there is no space before baz.

markdown-it works fine with example 221.

[zq1997]

Yeah, example 221 use two >, but I test it with three, that's why autotest didn't report this issue.

[rlidwka]

Fixed, thanks for reporting.