I noticed the logic for handling the include and exclude options is currently
function ignore(name, path, rules) {
if (rules.exclude) {
//....
} else if (rules.include) {
//....
}
return false;
}
This doesn't let you do more specific things like "include src/ and test/ but exclude src/foo" or something like that.
If you just change it to
function ignore(name, path, rules) {
if (rules.exclude) {
//.... same as before
}
if (rules.include) {
//.... //same as before
}
//they didn't match either rule, so if an include pattern exists, this is ignored, otherwise it is not
return !!rules.include;
}
i think it would allow for those new types of patterns. It would be a breaking change, since people may be relying on the current behavior of ignoring the include flag if the exclude flag exists, but I think it would be an improvement.
If you're open to the change, I'd be happy to make a PR to do it.
I noticed the logic for handling the include and exclude options is currently
This doesn't let you do more specific things like "include src/ and test/ but exclude src/foo" or something like that.
If you just change it to
i think it would allow for those new types of patterns. It would be a breaking change, since people may be relying on the current behavior of ignoring the include flag if the exclude flag exists, but I think it would be an improvement.
If you're open to the change, I'd be happy to make a PR to do it.