Skip to content

feat: Adding Space Module Docs Improvement#1153

Open
NicolaBernini wants to merge 2 commits into
leanprover-community:masterfrom
NicolaBernini:feat/space-module-docs-improvement-7-June-2026
Open

feat: Adding Space Module Docs Improvement#1153
NicolaBernini wants to merge 2 commits into
leanprover-community:masterfrom
NicolaBernini:feat/space-module-docs-improvement-7-June-2026

Conversation

@NicolaBernini

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Overview

Adding Space Module Docs Improvement

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for this PR, which will now be reviewed. Please
see our review guidelines
if you are not familiar with the process. You should expect a back and forth
with a reviewer before your PR is merged. See also that link for how to
add appropriate labels to your PR. The PR will also go through a number
of automated checks. You can learn more about these here,
including how to run them locally.

If you want to bring attention to this PR, please write a message on this
thread of the Lean Zulip.

Comment thread Physlib/SpaceAndTime/Space/Module.lean Outdated
facts: the type was defined as a structure instead of an abbreviation for
`EuclideanSpace ℝ (Fin d)`. In particular, the additive and module structures
choose an origin, while the norm, inner product, and Borel structure choose the
standard Euclidean coordinate geometry on `Fin d`.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure Fin d is right here. Also this should be moved further up (either to before the first instance or placed in the module doc-string of Space.Basic.

@NicolaBernini NicolaBernini force-pushed the feat/space-module-docs-improvement-7-June-2026 branch from 204cd26 to 4e641c1 Compare June 10, 2026 17:03
@@ -21,6 +21,24 @@ The scope of this module is to define on `Space d` the structure of a `Module`
These instances require certain non-canonical choices to be made, for example the choice
of a zero and for a basis, a choice of orientation.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
## Instances in Lean

@jstoobysmith jstoobysmith added the awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes label Jun 11, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants