Evaluate and decide one INCLUDE LinkML Validator options

[tursynay]

Evaluating which of these two options is the most suitable for validator:

• Currently utilizing pydantic classes from LinkML model to validated harmonized data (this approach was considered based on class bindings, bar delimited lists, customized validation log ,etc.)
• Utilize dictionary comprehension/ linkml-validator to avoid updating pydantic class customization.

This ticket is related to this issue: #196

https://pypi.org/project/mike/ -for versioning

[lopierra]

@madanucd is this a good time to make the switch to linkml-validator, rather than having to update the INCLUDE validator with all the recent reformats (making a single YAML file, etc)

[tursynay]

@madanucd to add some comments and then close about CLA

[tursynay]

@madanucd , just pinging about this issue, I know you were close

[tursynay]

@lopierra to review approve the PR