Conversation
8d80a67 to
f1742b2
Compare
simongdavies
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Some minor commments, on this:
If we want to maintain the old behavior of kill() being effective in the entire MultiUseSandbox::call() scope, we can do that too , just needs moving 1 line of code around (effective here meaning skipping the next VM entry).
I think we should.
jsturtevant
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks splitting this out and for the detailed docs!
dblnz
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Some minor comments from me.
Good work with the docs explaining the cancellation feature and splitting the PR 👍
Signed-off-by: Ludvig Liljenberg <4257730+ludfjig@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Ludvig Liljenberg <4257730+ludfjig@users.noreply.github.com>
b9c56ef to
7bf68a9
Compare
jsturtevant
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, Would like @simongdavies to give one more pass too. There is a bit more clean up we can do but I believe you will take care of that with some of the other PR's in the queue.
simongdavies
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM with minor request for a code comment
Signed-off-by: Ludvig Liljenberg <4257730+ludfjig@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Ludvig Liljenberg <4257730+ludfjig@users.noreply.github.com>
ee98dd8 to
a94045c
Compare
…g sandbox Signed-off-by: Ludvig Liljenberg <4257730+ludfjig@users.noreply.github.com>
a94045c to
9200b1b
Compare
52d7584
Signed-off-by: Ludvig Liljenberg <4257730+ludfjig@users.noreply.github.com>
c457c26 to
8e69643
Compare
Signed-off-by: Ludvig Liljenberg <4257730+ludfjig@users.noreply.github.com>
8e69643 to
d65d4bb
Compare
Simplifies cancellation logic and unifies logic for all hypervisors, without affecting current behavior. Adds documentation to how everything works