You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Executive read: 24 pending items (43% of outcomes) signal workflows that need engagement triage; PR Sous Chef dominates volume with 13 pending + 7 unknown; high zero-touch rate (0%) indicates all accepted items required follow-up action, not autonomous acceptance.
References: one linked item per status emoji, in the same order as the Status column
🔴 Action Items
PR Sous Chef — highest pending volume — 13 pending + 7 unknown (59% of its 34 outcomes). Recommends reviewing acceptance criteria and engagement signal strength; many pending comments lack follow-up.
Stuck pending patterns — AI Moderator (4 pending), Contribution Check (3 pending), Auto-Triage Issues (1 pending) all show "retention window not elapsed" or "no follow-up" — these workflows lack observable engagement. Review if output is reaching the right audience or if criteria for acceptance are too strict.
Underdefined review workflows — Impeccable Skills Reviewer, Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer, and AI Moderator show unknown/pending-only outcomes; review lifecycle tracking and ensure acceptance/rejection criteria are documented.
Zero-touch rate: 0% — All 8 accepted items required follow-up (medium evidence), no autonomous acceptance. This is normal for comment/update workflows but signals the agent is not producing outputs that stand on their own.
Discussion workflows showing ignored — 6 workflows produce discussions with 0 replies (ignored): Sentrux Report, Observability Report, Lockfile Analysis, Team Evolution Insights, Prompt Pattern Analysis, Audit Agent. Consider if these are reaching the right audience or if discussion format is appropriate.
Detailed metrics, evidence quality, workflow counts, and trends
Outcome Scorecard — 2026-07-22
Metric
Value
Status
Acceptance rate
53.33%
🟡 60-80% range is ideal; this is slightly below
Zero-touch rate
0%
🔴 <25%; all accepted items required follow-up
Waste rate
12.5%
🟢 <10% is ideal; this is acceptable
Median time to resolution
—
null (no resolved items yet)
Accepted
8 / 56
—
— strong evidence
0
merged, completed, approved
— medium evidence
8
engaged, retained
— weak evidence
0
existence only
Rejected
7
—
Ignored
7
no observable follow-up
Zero-touch
0 / 8
—
Pending
24
—
Runs checked
27
—
Per-Workflow Breakdown
Workflow
Accepted
Rejected
Ignored
Pending
Acceptance
Zero-touch
PR Sous Chef
7
7
0
13
50%
0%
Contribution Check
0
0
0
3
—%
—%
AI Moderator
0
0
0
4
—%
—%
Auto-Triage Issues
0
0
0
1
—%
—%
Daily Model Inventory Checker
0
0
0
1
—%
—%
Daily Reliability Review
0
0
0
1
—%
—%
PR Code Quality Reviewer
0
0
0
1
—%
—%
Daily Documentation Healer
1
0
0
0
100%
0%
Agentic Workflow Audit Agent
0
0
1
0
0%
—%
Copilot PR Prompt Pattern Analysis
0
0
1
0
0%
—%
Daily Observability Report for AWF Firewall and MCP Gateway
0
0
1
0
0%
—%
Daily Sentrux Report
0
0
1
0
0%
—%
Daily Team Evolution Insights
0
0
1
0
0%
—%
Detection Analysis Report
0
0
1
0
0%
—%
Lockfile Statistics Analysis Agent
0
0
1
0
0%
—%
Impeccable Skills Reviewer
0
0
0
0
—%
—%
Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer
0
0
0
0
—%
—%
Note on data quality: No items evaluated with existence-only fallback; all outcomes have explicit evidence.
Warning
Firewall blocked 1 domain
The following domain was blocked by the firewall during workflow execution:
awmgmcpg
To allow these domains, add them to the network.allowed list in your workflow frontmatter:
Workflow Health — 2026-07-22
Executive read: 24 pending items (43% of outcomes) signal workflows that need engagement triage; PR Sous Chef dominates volume with 13 pending + 7 unknown; high zero-touch rate (0%) indicates all accepted items required follow-up action, not autonomous acceptance.
Legend:
🔴 Action Items
PR Sous Chef — highest pending volume — 13 pending + 7 unknown (59% of its 34 outcomes). Recommends reviewing acceptance criteria and engagement signal strength; many pending comments lack follow-up.
Stuck pending patterns — AI Moderator (4 pending), Contribution Check (3 pending), Auto-Triage Issues (1 pending) all show "retention window not elapsed" or "no follow-up" — these workflows lack observable engagement. Review if output is reaching the right audience or if criteria for acceptance are too strict.
Underdefined review workflows — Impeccable Skills Reviewer, Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer, and AI Moderator show unknown/pending-only outcomes; review lifecycle tracking and ensure acceptance/rejection criteria are documented.
Zero-touch rate: 0% — All 8 accepted items required follow-up (medium evidence), no autonomous acceptance. This is normal for comment/update workflows but signals the agent is not producing outputs that stand on their own.
Discussion workflows showing ignored — 6 workflows produce discussions with 0 replies (ignored): Sentrux Report, Observability Report, Lockfile Analysis, Team Evolution Insights, Prompt Pattern Analysis, Audit Agent. Consider if these are reaching the right audience or if discussion format is appropriate.
Detailed metrics, evidence quality, workflow counts, and trends
Outcome Scorecard — 2026-07-22
Per-Workflow Breakdown
Note on data quality: No items evaluated with existence-only fallback; all outcomes have explicit evidence.
Warning
Firewall blocked 1 domain
The following domain was blocked by the firewall during workflow execution:
awmgmcpgSee Network Configuration for more information.