update/complete haskell tags#1124
Conversation
|
@gacallea Presently Other than that, do you have anything to add? If not, I'll approve. |
Hi Matt, tbh I'm not sure. The reason I didn't put it is because Tags.md said "implicit with functional" so I thought it was going to be automatic. Bottom line: IF all other FP langs do have it, I'm going to add it here as well. Let me know :) |
|
@MatthijsBlom better still: official wiki doesn't define it as declarative. I'd leave it out. |
|
pps: (sorry for the spam). Declarative suits languages as Prolog but not Haskell or similar FP. It is nitpicking but I'd not add declarative to FP langs that aren't "marked as such" from official resources. |
|
Going by Wikipedia (e.g. «Functional programming», «Declarative programming»), declarative languages form a superset of both functional languages and logical languages. The section «What is functional programming» explicitly says that functional programming emphasizes the what over the how. By the way: as is the nature of wikis, the wikis themselves might be 'official', but their contents generally aren't. |
|
no problem then. If wikipedia is the primary source, then I'm ok with it. I usually prefer official sources if available. modifying the file :) |
|
It seems I'm not allowed to Approve. @petertseng I think this is mergeable. |
ErikSchierboom
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I like how you've documented the choices made.
* adding declarative as mentioned here, functional languages should be tagged declarative too. exercism/haskell#1124 (comment) * adding TAGS.md based on both haskell tags and javascript tags. didn't add checkmarks where not strictly official. however, commented those with "possible" where a technology can offer that functionality. * Update TAGS.md Co-authored-by: Cedd Burge <ceddlyburge@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Cedd Burge <ceddlyburge@users.noreply.github.com>
|
hi :) I was wondering if there are any stoppers for this merge? Anything I should do? please and thank you |
|
@gacallea I'd like @petertseng to also look at this, as he's the resident Haskell maintainer. |
@ErikSchierboom ok thank you :) i appreciate. |
|
@gacallea If Peter hasn't found time to review in a couple of days, let me know and I'll merge. |
|
yay! thank you all :) |
fixes exercism/exercism#6610
fixes #939