Use execvp rather then execv in exec_process#22737
Conversation
|
(do we have ccache on the CI machines?) |
Probably not.. so I guess we can expect to see this file on test-other. Lets see. I'll add it once that is confirmed. |
When this code was added in emscripten-core#20909 it broke users who were doing `EM_COMPILER_WRAPPER=cache` since it was not using PATH to find the executable (unlike the subprocess module). Fixes: emscripten-core#22736
|
Just wondering, is |
Hmm.. I can't remember exactly that
|
|
Thanks for the information!
It seems to work without any patches, though I haven't tested it extensively. emsdk also provides a patched version of ccache through the (the same question was raised in #13498 (comment)) |
|
Sounds like performance is that reason to prefer _EMCC_CCACHE. I do wonder if the difference is still as significant these days. |
When this code was added in #20909 it broke users who were doing
EM_COMPILER_WRAPPER=cachesince it was not using PATH to find the executable (unlike the subprocess module).Fixes: #22736