-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
Use compareExchange to set detach_state in pthread_join_js #15481
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps we should print an error, instead of
abort()-ing whenASSERTIONSare enabled?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I considered that yes. But then I looked at the existing musl code it just aborts in this case. I think it means your program is invalid if this happens:
See:
emscripten/system/lib/libc/musl/src/thread/pthread_join.c
Line 17 in d90468c
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah yes, it is considered to be undefined behavior. I currently patched that with this:
emscripten/system/lib/libc/musl/src/thread/pthread_join.c
Lines 31 to 40 in 3d39427
in PR #13007, since the POSIX test suite depend on this (
__pthread_timedjoin_npis also used bypthread_detach, so detaching an already-detached thread would then also crash).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it enough to check for this on entry to pthread_join? Its seems like that is enough to make the testsuite happy anyway.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have a followup patch that looked very much like
emscripten/system/lib/libc/musl/src/thread/pthread_join.c
Lines 31 to 40 in 3d39427
Sorry my work seems to be overlapping so with things you have already done :-/
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This assertion cannot hurt I think.
Ah interesting. Perhaps it was already caught by this check?:
emscripten/system/lib/pthread/pthread_join.c
Lines 23 to 26 in f065db6
No worries. I'm still a student, so it's a great learning experience anyway.