Skip to content

Set max_open_files to 0#140

Closed
githubzilla wants to merge 0 commit intoeloqdata:eloq-10.6.10from
githubzilla:zero_max_open_files
Closed

Set max_open_files to 0#140
githubzilla wants to merge 0 commit intoeloqdata:eloq-10.6.10from
githubzilla:zero_max_open_files

Conversation

@githubzilla
Copy link
Collaborator

@githubzilla githubzilla commented Oct 20, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated an internal submodule/dependency reference; no user-facing or behavioral changes observed.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 20, 2025

Walkthrough

Updates the storage/eloq/store_handler subproject commit pointer from a3fdbbc866c98b4e70a02aac31a17f408d45d15a to c78d7889e7fc051112b29db445f1c9f24d278642. No code or behavior changes are introduced by this pointer update.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Submodule Pointer Update
storage/eloq/store_handler
Subproject commit advanced from a3fdbbc866c98b4e70a02aac31a17f408d45d15a to c78d7889e7fc051112b29db445f1c9f24d278642

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • update subm #119: Updates the same storage/eloq/store_handler submodule pointer to a different target commit.

Poem

🐰 A tiny hop to a newer hash, so spry,
The pointer shifted, watching branches fly,
No lines rewritten, no tests ask why,
I munch a carrot and blink an approving eye. 🥕✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The pull request title "Set max_open_files to 0" is clearly related to the changeset and accurately conveys the intent of the pull request. While the mechanical change is a subproject commit update in storage/eloq/store_handler, the title effectively describes what this update is intended to accomplish. The title is concise, specific, and provides meaningful information that allows a teammate to understand the purpose of the change without additional context.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 741876f and cb5a9ad.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • storage/eloq/store_handler (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • storage/eloq/store_handler

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 42c52db and 741876f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • storage/eloq/store_handler (1 hunks)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant