Skip to content

Conversation

@masc2023
Copy link
Contributor

@masc2023 masc2023 commented Oct 9, 2025

resolves all warnings

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2025

The created documentation from the pull request is available at: docu-html

:status: valid
:tags: quality_management
:complies: std_wp__iso26262__management_553, std_req__iso26262__management_5423
:complies: std_wp__iso26262__management_553, std_req__aspice_40__iic-18-07, std_req__aspice_40__iic-18-52
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
:complies: std_wp__iso26262__management_553, std_req__aspice_40__iic-18-07, std_req__aspice_40__iic-18-52
:complies: std_req__iso26262__management_5451, std_req__aspice_40__iic-18-07, std_req__aspice_40__iic-18-52, std_req__aspice_40__iic-10-50, std_req__aspice_40__iic-10-51,

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm also wondering why there is no warning on the left entry std_wp linked to complies. Therefore there was a warning.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Disagree here, QMP is a work product, therefor the std_wp is correct, will not change, exception is std_req__aspice_40__iic, as communicated, that are characteristics

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was wrong, agree. I mixed it up and looked into the wrong line also.

increase process_description version to enable patch release
resolves all warnings
@masc2023 masc2023 force-pushed the update_dac_to_v140 branch from 11f3152 to 028ec48 Compare October 9, 2025 10:58
@masc2023 masc2023 requested a review from PandaeDo October 9, 2025 10:59
@masc2023 masc2023 dismissed PandaeDo’s stale review October 9, 2025 10:59

False positive

Copy link
Contributor

@PandaeDo PandaeDo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fine for me

@masc2023 masc2023 merged commit 0ac7c3b into main Oct 9, 2025
5 checks passed
@masc2023 masc2023 deleted the update_dac_to_v140 branch October 9, 2025 11:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants