Follow-up work for PartitionedRateLimiter

[BrennanConroy]

This issue is tracking follow up work from the initial implementation of PartitionedRateLimiter in #67677.

• Figure out what interval to use for the internal Timer
  • Dynamically change it based on the intervals of the replenishing limiters?
  • Come up with some "good enough" default
  • Make it an option that the user must configure?
• Background exceptions are currently ignored and not visible to users
  • Check what other libraries like HttpClient do
  • Maybe ExceptionDispatchInfo.Capture and dispatch throwing to the threadpool so it's at least an unhandled exception
• Start using IdleDuration to cleanup internal dictionary when limiters aren't active
  • Probably don't want to immediately remove limiters when they become idle, likely should wait 10 seconds or something

Tagging subscribers to this area: @mangod9
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

---

This issue is tracking follow up work from the initial implementation of PartitionedRateLimiter in #67677.

• Figure out what interval to use for the internal Timer
  • Dynamically change it based on the intervals of the replenishing limiters?
  • Come up with some "good enough" default
  • Make it an option that the user must configure?
• Background exceptions are currently ignored and not visible to users
  • Check what other libraries like HttpClient do
  • Maybe ExceptionDispatchInfo.Capture and dispatch throwing to the threadpool so it's at least an unhandled exception
• Start using IdleDuration to cleanup internal dictionary when limiters aren't active
  • Probably don't want to immediately remove limiters when they become idle, likely should wait 10 seconds or something

Author:	BrennanConroy
Assignees:	BrennanConroy
Labels:	area-System.Threading
Milestone:	7.0.0

[mangod9]

since this is tagged under system.threading, checking whether any of this work is still meant for 7?

[mangod9]

ok to close this out since its still tagged for 7?

[mangod9]

checking if this is still being looked into for 8?