lucetc: report all unresolved bindings, not just the first one

[jedisct1]

No description provided.

[fst-crenshaw]

Thanks for this quick work to improve the error output that lucet provides! It will help users to know the full list of unresolved bindings.

One of the things that bit me a little bit over in #374 was the lack of tests on error output. I ended up squashing too much error output. 😿

With that in mind, I wonder if you might have plans to add a test for this work?

[jedisct1]

Is anyhow guaranteed to always print errors the same way, byte for byte?

[pchickey]

@jedisct1 for testing I'd reuse the existing import_many.wat test and match on the lucetc::Error, rather than coerce it to an anyhow::Error.

[pchickey]

This PR was closed as a byproduct of deleting the branch named master. If this is still an active PR, re-open as a new PR against main.