add link to Web UIs, Mobile App, and fineract.dev

[vorburger]

No description provided.

[vorburger]

#783 ignores the failing test. I'm closing and re-opening to see if it passes.

@awasum do you want to review and Rebase and Merge this REVIEW change?

[awasum]

Seems there is a problem.

org.apache.fineract.integrationtests.RecurringDepositTest > testRecurringDepositAccountWithPrematureClosureTypeReinvest FAILED
    java.lang.AssertionError at RecurringDepositTest.java:3048

[awasum]

Here is the problem: https://travis-ci.org/github/apache/fineract/builds/677887476

[vorburger]

#784

[vorburger]

@nikpawar89 @xurror thanks for your interest and votes of support for the README change in #782.

How do you feel about this one?

[nikpawar89]

@vorburger just thinking out loud- do we want to mention https://github.com/openMF/mifosx for pentaho reports related module? otherwise +1 from me.

[xurror]

LGTM

[awasum]

@vorburger just thinking out loud- do we want to mention https://github.com/openMF/mifosx for pentaho reports related module? otherwise +1 from me.

Hmm..Good one...But pentaho reports with current Fineract is even broken.

[vorburger]

@vorburger just thinking out loud- do we want to mention https://github.com/openMF/mifosx for pentaho reports related module?

No, I'm actively against that, because I fear that could create a lot more confusion than answer anyone's question... that repo de facto is "dead", given that it hasn't been updated in 4 years, and IMHO we shouldn't refer to it anymore from Fineract's README (other than perhaps from a "Historical" section for archaeologists, if anyone would like to add something like that).

I do understand the (old) issue about Pentaho-based reports having been "lost" in the move to Apache. That is a problem I suspect someone will want to address somehow, someday (with a separate additional service, perhaps?), but this PR is not the place for that?

Anyway, strictly speaking, https://github.com/openMF/mifosx is course not the "pentaho reports related module", but a (now very old) predecessor version of the same code that is in this repo. (You cannot "use" that "module" with fineract, just like that.)

otherwise +1 from me.

Ok, then based on that +1 and @xurror approval, let's merge this, if OK for you as-is @awasum ?

PS: Build failed again due to another FINERACT-885 - I'll deal with that separately, let's not hold this up.

[awasum]

Go ahead. @vorburger