Set task name for 2.11.X path

[o-nikolas]

fixes #63729

Celery now uses explicit task names when submitting tasks to workers (see send_workload_to_executor), make sure to set that explicit name on the older module level app that Airflow 2.x uses.

---

Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?

• Yes (please specify the tool below)
  claude

---

• Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information. Note: commit author/co-author name and email in commits become permanently public when merged.
• For fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
• When adding dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
• For significant user-facing changes create newsfragment: {pr_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments. You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you know the PR number.

[o-nikolas]

CC @potiuk @Aakcht @kalluripradeep

[o-nikolas]

CI image builds are broken in main

[kalluripradeep]

Thanks for catching this @o-nikolas @Aakcht and for the quick fix in #63746.

You're right — my fix in #63110 correctly registered execute_workload for the Airflow 3.x path but missed that the Airflow 2.x execute_command task name needed to be set explicitly to match what workers expect.

The fix in #63746 looks correct — setting the explicit task name on the legacy module-level app ensures Airflow 2.x workers receive the short name they look for. Happy to help test or review if needed.

[o-nikolas]

Thanks for catching this @o-nikolas @Aakcht and for the quick fix in #63746.

You're right — my fix in #63110 correctly registered execute_workload for the Airflow 3.x path but missed that the Airflow 2.x execute_command task name needed to be set explicitly to match what workers expect.

The fix in #63746 looks correct — setting the explicit task name on the legacy module-level app ensures Airflow 2.x workers receive the short name they look for. Happy to help test or review if needed.

Thanks for the review @kalluripradeep! If it looks good to you, please approve the PR 🙂

Also any testing is always welcomed, especially with this type of edge case. I tests manually but please double check my work

[Aakcht]

Hi, tested it, the fix seems to help, thanks!

[potiuk]

Hi, tested it, the fix seems to help, thanks!

Cooool Thanks !

[potiuk]

Failure unrelated - fixing it in #63763

[potiuk]

Needs rebase I think

[o-nikolas]

Needs rebase I think

After pulling in main the tests are green. Merging!

[potiuk]

cool