Skip to content

feat(recommend): add "Looking Similar" model#1469

Merged
shortcuts merged 5 commits into
masterfrom
feat/looking-similar
Jul 18, 2023
Merged

feat(recommend): add "Looking Similar" model#1469
shortcuts merged 5 commits into
masterfrom
feat/looking-similar

Conversation

@raed667

@raed667 raed667 commented Jul 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Implement Recommend looking-similar model.

Beyond the model name, everything else should work exactly as other recommend models such as related products.

@raed667 raed667 requested a review from marialungu July 10, 2023 07:51
@codesandbox-ci

codesandbox-ci Bot commented Jul 10, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 5ec2f38:

Sandbox Source
javascript-client-app Configuration

@dhayab dhayab left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My guess regarding failing tests is that they are just really flaky. I looked into merged PRs and all their pipelines are retried a few time until they go green.

Comment thread packages/recommend/src/methods/getLookingSimilar.ts Outdated
Comment thread lerna.json Outdated
raed667 and others added 2 commits July 13, 2023 21:51
Co-authored-by: Dhaya <154633+dhayab@users.noreply.github.com>
@raed667 raed667 marked this pull request as ready for review July 17, 2023 13:51
@raed667 raed667 requested a review from dhayab July 17, 2023 14:59

@shortcuts shortcuts left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this looks great :) do you plan on adding it to the generated clients too?

@dhayab dhayab left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me 👍.

Regarding the RC release, as this addition follows closely how other methods are defined, I think it can be released directly in a minor as part of the monorepo release process.

If you prefer having an RC/Beta release, you should not merge this branch, and we can instead perform a manual release (or perhaps there's another process owners can guide us through).

@raed667

raed667 commented Jul 18, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@shortcuts indeed we should this to the generated clients as well 👍

@dhayab No beta/RC needed, once merged this should probably be simply released under 4.19.0

@shortcuts

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@shortcuts indeed we should this to the generated clients as well 👍

cool! let me know if you need help contributing to the specs

@shortcuts shortcuts merged commit 01eac7f into master Jul 18, 2023
@shortcuts shortcuts deleted the feat/looking-similar branch July 18, 2023 10:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants