Skip to content

Conversation

@stchris
Copy link
Contributor

@stchris stchris commented Feb 28, 2023

The diff is weird because the file used to have DOS-style line endings, which I made consistent with all other files in the repo. The only change is in the last line, allowing us to skip this action if it fails (and not take down the whole build with it). See https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions#jobsjob_idstepscontinue-on-error

@stchris stchris force-pushed the allow-add-to-project-to-fail branch from ff92c93 to 02d0605 Compare February 28, 2023 05:51
@stchris stchris marked this pull request as draft February 28, 2023 05:53
@stchris stchris force-pushed the allow-add-to-project-to-fail branch from 02d0605 to 7167c1d Compare March 6, 2023 10:05
@stchris stchris marked this pull request as ready for review March 6, 2023 10:30
@stchris stchris requested a review from Rosencrantz March 6, 2023 10:31
@stchris stchris merged commit 32218e4 into develop Mar 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants