Updating JavaDoc with correct return types#5600
Merged
akarnokd merged 1 commit intoReactiveX:2.xfrom Sep 14, 2017
levaja:JavaDocFixes
Merged
Updating JavaDoc with correct return types#5600akarnokd merged 1 commit intoReactiveX:2.xfrom levaja:JavaDocFixes
akarnokd merged 1 commit intoReactiveX:2.xfrom
levaja:JavaDocFixes
Conversation
akarnokd
approved these changes
Sep 14, 2017
Member
|
The |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 2.x #5600 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 96.2% 96.15% -0.06%
- Complexity 5838 5840 +2
===========================================
Files 632 632
Lines 41473 41473
Branches 5745 5745
===========================================
- Hits 39898 39877 -21
- Misses 632 637 +5
- Partials 943 959 +16
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A small PR with updated JavaDoc, mentioned in the issue #5595 (thanks to @RobLewis for reporting it).
Updated documentation about return types, where
Observablewas incorrectly mentioned instead ofSingle.