2.x: Rename BackpressureStrategy.NONE to MISSING#4767
Merged
akarnokd merged 1 commit intoReactiveX:2.xfrom Oct 25, 2016
arturdryomov:rename-none-strategy-to-missing
Merged
2.x: Rename BackpressureStrategy.NONE to MISSING#4767akarnokd merged 1 commit intoReactiveX:2.xfrom arturdryomov:rename-none-strategy-to-missing
akarnokd merged 1 commit intoReactiveX:2.xfrom
arturdryomov:rename-none-strategy-to-missing
Conversation
JakeWharton
approved these changes
Oct 25, 2016
akarnokd
approved these changes
Oct 25, 2016
Current coverage is 95.70% (diff: 100%)@@ 2.x #4767 diff @@
==========================================
Files 570 570
Lines 36711 36711
Methods 0 0
Messages 0 0
Branches 5555 5555
==========================================
- Hits 35138 35136 -2
Misses 648 648
- Partials 925 927 +2
|
Contributor
|
Yay! |
Closed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As discussed in #4643.