Hello,
I would like to briefly reopen the issue #43 on the review of the paper #24 submitted to the Ten Years Reproducibility Challenge. I am sorry for not having been able to meet the required reproducibility criteria for inclusion in the challenge proceedings but I still put some effort into it and I wish the paper to be made eventually available, even if lately, possibly on some archive like Zenodo or arXiv. I am asking if I can just put it there as it was submitted to the challenge, including the formatting, or if I need to change it to some more “author version” style. Here are links to the version that was submitted and to the project GitHub:
https://github.com/quenot/opflow/raw/master/jeif98/ReScience_C_ODP_PIV_submitted.pdf
https://github.com/quenot/opflow/tree/master/jeif98
Best regards,
Georges Quénot.
Hello,
I would like to briefly reopen the issue #43 on the review of the paper #24 submitted to the Ten Years Reproducibility Challenge. I am sorry for not having been able to meet the required reproducibility criteria for inclusion in the challenge proceedings but I still put some effort into it and I wish the paper to be made eventually available, even if lately, possibly on some archive like Zenodo or arXiv. I am asking if I can just put it there as it was submitted to the challenge, including the formatting, or if I need to change it to some more “author version” style. Here are links to the version that was submitted and to the project GitHub:
https://github.com/quenot/opflow/raw/master/jeif98/ReScience_C_ODP_PIV_submitted.pdf
https://github.com/quenot/opflow/tree/master/jeif98
Best regards,
Georges Quénot.